|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
pic: Prototype Drivetrain v2
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain v2
I would recommend powering all of the wheels that will be in contact with the ground, including the Omni wheels. In addition to that, are you planning on using the custom traction wheels shown in this model? If so, do the spokes require 3D contouring?
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain v2
I'm not sure how to power the omni's when they're in a suspension. We may use the custom wheels, the spokes are flat, no fillet's into the rim.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain v2
What, may I ask, is the point of the suspension?
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain v2
could you possibly design a suspension that could keep a chain tensioned? Possible have it move around a point that would have the chain stay tensioned as it goes up and down?
Or could you have a chain tensioner that keeps a chain tensioned by use of springs and have the springs that hold the chain tensioned be easier to compress/expand than the spring or whatever you are using to make the wheels have suspension. I am trying to design a suspension for our robot next year but the wheels would be powered in one way or another I don't see a point in having a suspension if you are not going to power the wheels. What is the reason behind having a suspension on unpowered wheels? |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain v2
Why exactly do you need suspension?
Wouldn't it be much easier to lower the center wheels by about 1/8" and power the other wheels with chain? or just going flat 6WD? |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain v2
The suspension is there to improve handling, much like a rocker, only smoother.
I was thinking about widening the carriage for the suspension and putting a dual sprocket with a bearing on the dead axle that is the pivot point. Then run chain to the omni. |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain v2
Quote:
And if you want it to rock, why don't you just drop the center and forget about the suspension? If you want to still have the suspension, you could either do what you suggested or make the suspension go up and down along an arc with radius equal to the distance between the front and middle wheels, so the chain has a constant distance. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain v2
Quote:
There is currently no rock at rest. Once you begin moving the suspension absorbs any jarring movements like sudden stops or turns, making it handle more smoothly. |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain v2
Quote:
Don't get me wrong, I think your idea is really cool. It's just the matter of seeing if all the effort to get it to work is worth it, and if the benefits are true benefits. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain v2
Quote:
With springs tensioning the suspension, it will rock only as far as it needs to. Using a diff. eq. we can figure out the specs on the spring. Ideally, at rest, the spring keeps the wheels exactaly level. Once the robot starts moving and the CG "shifts" the springs will expand cushioning any sudden blow (like a rapid acceleration). Additionally, if this robot starts to get flipped, all wheels can stay on the ground providing some traction. The front ones would lift off the most, increasing the Fn on the rear and center That still leaves the problem of chain runs though. I'm not sure a slot would have low enough friction, plus the exterior has to be smooth for the bumpers. Last edited by 548swimmer : 09-05-2010 at 02:20. Reason: New info |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain v2
I don't know if this would work structurally, but you could cut slots and make a block that rides in the slot.
The other option would to be have a long arm pivoting on the center axle, but that might be too heavy/bulky for practicality. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain v2
Have you encountered a deficiency in the handling of a rigid (non suspended) drive?
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain v2
Quote:
Confucius say: Man who think physics is religion must sit in own pew. ![]() |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain v2
Quote:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/35715? Already got the tensioning down. I prayed to the physics gods, and they answered!! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: Prototype Drivetrain | 548swimmer | Extra Discussion | 38 | 09-05-2010 21:14 |
| pic: 499 Prototype drivetrain final layout | Andrew Schuetze | Extra Discussion | 9 | 01-01-2008 21:37 |
| pic: A drivetrain prototype idea | GMAdan | Extra Discussion | 16 | 24-04-2007 16:14 |
| 1541 Prototype Drivetrain | bombadier337 | Technical Discussion | 12 | 23-01-2006 08:26 |
| Image Discuss: Team 773 Drivetrain Prototype | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 5 | 27-01-2003 18:46 |