|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
pic: 2 Speed Rev 2
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2 Speed Rev 2
You know RC... I'm not surprised by this
Your CAD always looks amazing! Your work is very impressive! Very clean and elegant! |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2 Speed Rev 2
Nice model / gearbox!
How often did you guys play at 16FPS? When looking into drive boxes this year, I was looking at the 6 motor setup, but it seemed that adding 6 motors let you run at ~9.5 FPS while pretty close to traction limited. Was the high gear useful for your team, or just something nice to have? Also, can I have two? ![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2 Speed Rev 2
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 2 Speed Rev 2
Quote:
Hmm interesting question, I don't know if we ever got up to the full 16fps. I don't have anything quantitative but: -We were quick -The acceleration was amazing -It was nice being able to get from one side of the field to the other rather quickly. In a match we stayed in high gear the whole time except crossing the bump and pushing. Our driver absolutely loved having the high gear and we would not hesitate to gear this high again. Lol, sure Chris to go? Ether, I added more info to the pic: -6 Inch Wheel -Initial: 12:50 -Shfiter: 28:48 & 16:60 -RC |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2 Speed Rev 2
How do you do the shifting? Pneumatics, servo motor, or some other means? Did you cut the gears or use off the shelf gears?
Looks nice. - T |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 2 Speed Rev 2
Quote:
-RC |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2 Speed Rev 2
Can you show some alternate views of the gearbox?
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2 Speed Rev 2
Dude looks sick!
I am learning SolidWorks at school now, Its a really nice program. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 2 Speed Rev 2
Can you get rid of any of the standoffs in there to simplify it a bit, and reduce the parts count?
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 2 Speed Rev 2
Hi RC
Thank you for sharing. You have been busy. If you did this with SolidWorks Photoview 360 you really should put this image up on www.solidworksgallery.com. Very nice work. Marie |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2 Speed Rev 2
One more question: Why two 1/4 plates and not 1/8 plates with bearing shims? I haven't made many gearboxes or anything, so I'm trying to look into the advantages of one over the other.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 2 Speed Rev 2
@Chris - If I had to take a guess as to why there are no flanges, I would say it has something to do with DFMA as not every team has easy access to bending parts accurately (we certainly don't), or ease of access and assembly.
Also, what exactly is the plate thickness? I need to know for a project I'm working on. Nice gearbox btw. Last edited by J93Wagner : 28-09-2010 at 19:52. |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 2 Speed Rev 2
Quote:
This gearbox was made for our 2010 robot. The only reason for the extra four standoffs are just so the gearbox stays together at all times. The other four standoffs are just purely for mounting. If I was going to do this again, It would not have as many spacers. Quote:
It was indeed rendered with Photoview 360, I'll definitely put it up when I get a chance. Quote:
The reasons why I use 1/4" Plate over 1/8" Plate -Stiffer -Can be tap'd -Thickness for bearing -Allows for counterbores Quote:
Thanks, -RC |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2 Speed Rev 2
sick model dude!!
![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: MadTown Chassis Rev 4 | R.C. | Extra Discussion | 19 | 16-12-2009 17:20 |
| Renumbering of rules in rev F and Rev G of section 8 | Joe Ross | Rules/Strategy | 3 | 02-02-2009 21:46 |
| pic: Evolution of a gearbox rev 4 | roboticWanderor | Extra Discussion | 9 | 27-05-2008 09:19 |