|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Chassis Shape
Could a chassis be a polygon or v shaped or does it need to be rectangular?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chassis Shape
It is a possibility to have a non-rectangular chassis, such as the AndyMark Tri-Lambda Drive Platform. You could make a v shaped chassis, but it would be a matter of item (ie. wheels, motors, controller) placement.
http://www.andymark.com/ProductDetai...ctCode=am-0666 |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chassis Shape
I've merely skimmed through the manual but does it say anything about the shape in the rules anywhere?
Nemisis Team 2389 |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Chassis Shape
Quote:
That being said, as long as all other rules followed, any convex polygon would be legal, |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chassis Shape
It is possible. Keep bumper rules in mind, though, especially "BUMPERS segments must have a minimum length of six inches" (<R07-D>)
However, a V-shaped robot would not work well with bumper rules. Keep in mind the definition of the frame perimeter - it basically has to be a convex robot. Last edited by Karibou : 09-01-2011 at 17:18. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chassis Shape
Basically convex..... so roughly?
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chassis Shape
See Figure 4-3 on page 8 of the robot section of the manual. If the robot was V-shaped, it would be a very small V.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chassis Shape
Ah okay. So im looking at the figure and it shows a total gap of 18inches unsupported bumper and its okay but on the other side there is a gap of 10 inches unsupported and its not okay, how is that?
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chassis Shape
Is it because the gap behind the 10 inch is only 1/4 inch versus 2 inches?
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chassis Shape
Quote:
The difference in legality between the two 10" gaps is the depth. The 10"x1/4" is legal because it is not greater than 1/4" deep. The 10"x2" is illegal because 2">1/4". |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chassis Shape
While the picutres are pretty, it would help you a lot more if you actaully read the rules. Especially R07 K.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chassis Shape
And also while it helps to read, it NEVER hurts to discuss the pictures as well as the written rules.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chassis Shape
My bad Karibou i meant 17 inches. But i understand now thanks!
![]() |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chassis Shape
While that is true, the rules should be read so that the pictures can be understood. I don't care if a picture says a thousand words, if it's not saying the exact words, just looking at pictures is not good enough for FRC.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chassis Shape
Touche
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|