|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does the MiniBot need to be a "bot"
Does the MiniBot have to be a "Bot" can it just be a block that hits the light and sets it off?
Cause what it really needs to do it hit the button at the top of the pole to set the light off. Does it need all the requirements of a robot can't it just be an object like a computer mouse that sets it off. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Does the MiniBot need to be a "bot"
There is a specific definition of MINIBOT, including the parts it must be made out of. It does not have to meet the size/weight requirements for the ROBOT; it has it's own set of rules. See section 4.3.14 of the manual for rules on the MINIBOT and section 1.6 for definitions.
There is currently a debate about whether it is permissible to launch a passive MINIBOT to hit the target, which will hopefully be resolved in a Team Update or Q&A response within a couple of days. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Does the MiniBot need to be a "bot"
I am pretty sure that the rules say that you must have the minibot attach to the tower below the deployment line. As long as you do not launch the Minibot above the deployment line then you can launch a minibot away from your hostbot.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Does the MiniBot need to be a "bot"
Quote:
However, launching something that is not attached to the pole will be frowned upon under the Safety rules. P.S. "Pretty sure" doesn't cut it. It is best to cite the rule. For example, last year a team was "pretty sure" that their relief valve could be located off the compressor. The inspector at a preseason said it was good... Then the LRI agreed with me that it wasn't at the official event. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Does the MiniBot need to be a "bot"
In the manual, it specifies that you need at least ONE battery on the minibot. However, that doesn't mean you have to hook it up to anything.
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Does the MiniBot need to be a "bot"
Quote:
![]() |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Does the MiniBot need to be a "bot"
Quote:
Prize: 1 cookie. |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Does the MiniBot need to be a "bot"
Some folks say <R92> says that.
I say that it doesn't, and I also think the GDC has enough common sense not to force us to use a battery. But even <R92> bars more than one battery. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Does the MiniBot need to be a "bot"
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Does the MiniBot need to be a "bot"
I was more refering to the 'at least' part.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Does the MiniBot need to be a "bot"
I agree that a battery isn't required, it is just stated that the 12v is allowed. According to what I've read, I don't feel that the MiniBot needs to remain atop the tower once the pressure sensors have been triggered.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Does the MiniBot need to be a "bot"
<R92> begins with: "The following items are the only permitted materials for use on the MINIBOTS:" The list following is only a list of the items that can be used... a team isn't required to use all of them or any specific ones, as long as no unlisted components are used.
This seems like the most reasonable interpretation, I suppose the question should be asked of the GDC, though... |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Does the MiniBot need to be a "bot"
I'm >< to calling the GDC politicians instead of geniuses.
From Team Update #1: Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Does the MiniBot need to be a "bot"
i just read rule G19. all it says is: "After deployment, minirobots must remain completely autonomous."
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Does the MiniBot need to be a "bot"
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|