|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Team Update #1
http://www.usfirst.org/uploadedFiles...0Update_01.pdf
A synopsis: No minibot launching. One minibot per robot. We get an 84" diameter cylinder instead of a 60" diameter cylinder. We can use NXT sensors and cables on the minibot. Andymark addressed some KoP errors. Last edited by rutzman : 12-01-2011 at 00:53. Reason: Forgot an "s"... |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team Update #1
Thank the robot gods for an 84" cylinder.
![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update #1
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update #1
Awwww, the minibot rules just got stricter. Goodbye surgical tubing powered jumping minibot.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update #1
The OP does not state this but, in addition to no launching, MINIBOTS cannot hold stored energy. All movement must come from the motors.
|
|
#6
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Team Update #1
And this is why we don't do design until after Team Update #1 (and usually Team Update #2).
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team Update #1
minibots will now be completely and totally boring.
What's more inspiring, a 1 second minibot or waiting to see who reaches the pole first to deploy their minibot that takes 7 seconds to reach the top? |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update #1
Quote:
Steve |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update #1
Quote:
![]() |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team Update #1
Agreed. They should be relabeled to deployment races. It's now really whoever can jam their minibot into the pole fastest without destroying it.
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team Update #1
FIRST. You made a horrible call, you took what was potentially a good engineering design challenge, and turned it into a last ditch effort to save their inferior (to vex) FTC design competition.
It's now a challenge of who can make the SAME minibot lighter. Yay. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update #1
I also think it would have been really exciting to see a mini-bot launch to the top in 1 second. I also think this will lead to many teams copying (or getting inspired by)* sucessful mini-bot designs. It will be alot easier to change a mini-bot than change the mini-bot and the robot that launches it. This game is quickly losing the ways to differentiate the great and elite teams.
*Note: I have no problems with teams doing this, just that is leads to alot of similar robots and thus less exciting matches with diverse robots. |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team Update #1
I know everyone is rejoicing about the 84" cylinder, but I personally loved the 60" as an actual engineering challenge. What about this game is different than 2007 again? Minibots? OK, cool.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update #1
I'm very excited about the 84'!! however i'm not as joyful bout the minibot ideas... this is going to hinder design work just a bit... should still be interesting thou!
![]() |
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team Update #1
Quote:
Quote:
Bring it on. . |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|