Go to Post You can't reprogram physics. - Kevin Sevcik [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: Opinion on the use of the FTC Kit for the Mini Bot
I like and agree with the use of Tetrix for the mini Bot. 64 32.82%
I think the restriction to only use Tetrix is Unfair. 131 67.18%
Voters: 195. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-11-2011, 09:14 PM
Mike Martus's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Mike Martus Mike Martus is offline
Registered User
FRC #0051 (Wings of Fire)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Pontiac Michigan
Posts: 1,187
Mike Martus has a reputation beyond reputeMike Martus has a reputation beyond reputeMike Martus has a reputation beyond reputeMike Martus has a reputation beyond reputeMike Martus has a reputation beyond reputeMike Martus has a reputation beyond reputeMike Martus has a reputation beyond reputeMike Martus has a reputation beyond reputeMike Martus has a reputation beyond reputeMike Martus has a reputation beyond reputeMike Martus has a reputation beyond repute
Mini Bot - displeasure

Am I the only person out in the Community of FIRST that thinks the constraints of Tetrix (FTC kit) to build the mini bot is UNFAIR!

Up until this year Michigan was discouraged from FTC as FIRST was scared that they would loose FRC Growth due to costs. Now the winds have changed and we are asked to do something that is not possible. Not possible because:
1. Many of us do not have $400.00 for a basic kit + all the extra stuff that will make the amount higher..
2. No kits are available for purchase. This is the BIG one!!!!

If FIRST is pushing FTC you would think that they would have made sure that there was a stock for kits..... after all there are MANY more FRC teams than FTC teams - especially in Michigan.

I do get that FIRST is trying to compete with VEX - but at our expense and stress level.
__________________
Mike Martus
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-11-2011, 09:22 PM
Zachary Pilarsk Zachary Pilarsk is offline
Registered User
FRC #1711 (Raptors)
Team Role: Electrical
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: T.C. MI
Posts: 19
Zachary Pilarsk is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure

a fellow michigan team feeling the constraints this really stinks for us

it also forces all teams to build nearly the same mini bot
__________________
2009 T.C. Regional Image Design Winner
2009 Lansing Regional Image Design Winner
2010 T.C. Regional Image Deign Winner
2010 Grand Vally Regional Spirit Award Winner
2010 Michigan State Championship Image Design Winner
"Our robot might not work, we might not play the game well, but we sure do look good doing it."

Last edited by Zachary Pilarsk : 01-11-2011 at 10:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-11-2011, 09:23 PM
smistthegreat's Avatar
smistthegreat smistthegreat is offline
robots is a hard job
AKA: Brian Smist
FRC #4930 (The Electric Mayhem)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 240
smistthegreat has a reputation beyond reputesmistthegreat has a reputation beyond reputesmistthegreat has a reputation beyond reputesmistthegreat has a reputation beyond reputesmistthegreat has a reputation beyond reputesmistthegreat has a reputation beyond reputesmistthegreat has a reputation beyond reputesmistthegreat has a reputation beyond reputesmistthegreat has a reputation beyond reputesmistthegreat has a reputation beyond reputesmistthegreat has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure

I definitely second this, as my team is also in a place without many FTC teams, and we just don't have the access to the kit! That's a pretty steep investment to ask of any team, and to force it on some teams simply because they are inconveniently located in relation to FTC teams is quite honestly unfair.
__________________
University at Buffalo | Mechanical Engineering | Class of 2016
2014-20?? | Mentor | 4930 | The Electric Mayhem
2013 | Mentor | 229 | Division by Zero
2013 | Mentor | 4124 | Integration by Parts

2009-2012 | Student | 1507 | Warlocks
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-11-2011, 09:31 PM
Navid Shafa Navid Shafa is offline
FIRST Hiatus/Retired?
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,527
Navid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure

I have to say that I think that their idea was a good one, but their execution was poor. If you are unable to acquire one, due to mistakes on their part, that is truly unfair. You would think that if they knew these kind of things were coming, surplus stock would be prepared. I suppose you could do exactly what they want you to do, find the closest FTC team, and hope that they are generous. Sorry for the predicament this has put you and others in, good luck!
__________________
2015 & 2016 Fantasy FIRST Champions [Rotten Fruit Alliance]
Elgin Clock Award Winners: '13, '15, '16

Team 1983 | Alumnus, Former Mentor| Team_ 360 | Former Coach | Team 5803 | Former Mentor

"Once a Skunk, Always a Skunk"

Founding Member
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-11-2011, 09:38 PM
Mike Schreiber's Avatar
Mike Schreiber Mike Schreiber is offline
Registered User
FRC #0067 (The HOT Team)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milford, Michigan
Posts: 474
Mike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure

Mike I couldn't agree more. Not only is the restriction ridiculous and the availability even worse.

Teams who aren't competing until week 2 might as well just wait and see what everyone else did, because with update #1 there is no point in innovation.
__________________
Mike Schreiber

Kettering University ('09-'13) University of Michigan ('14-'18?)
FLL ('01-'02), FRC Team 27 ('06-'09), Team 397 ('10), Team 3450/314 ('11), Team 67 ('14-'??)
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-11-2011, 09:44 PM
ttldomination's Avatar
ttldomination ttldomination is offline
Sunny
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Roanoke, TX
Posts: 2,066
ttldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure

I do agree that this is a bit "limiting" but I think you also have to look at it from FIRST's point of view, the biggest thing being damage to their sensors. If one of these bots shoots up in under a second, I think that could do some significant damage to a sensor.

- Sunny
__________________
1261: 2007-2012
1648: 2013-2014
5283: 2015
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-11-2011, 09:52 PM
Navid Shafa Navid Shafa is offline
FIRST Hiatus/Retired?
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,527
Navid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond reputeNavid Shafa has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure

Quote:
Originally Posted by ttldomination View Post
From FIRST's point of view, the biggest thing being damage to their sensors. If one of these bots shoots up in under a second, I think that could do some significant damage to a sensor.

- Sunny
With the limited resources allowed, I'd be surprised to see a minibot that was able to do significant damage, even with the old rule set. The plates are designed to take at least 4-5 Newtons I'd bet even more. Knowing FIRST, these things will be made durable anyways, considering how much wear and tear it will receive at a regional event. I think it's A, a safety issue and B, a uniformity and regulation issue.
__________________
2015 & 2016 Fantasy FIRST Champions [Rotten Fruit Alliance]
Elgin Clock Award Winners: '13, '15, '16

Team 1983 | Alumnus, Former Mentor| Team_ 360 | Former Coach | Team 5803 | Former Mentor

"Once a Skunk, Always a Skunk"

Founding Member
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-11-2011, 09:55 PM
smistthegreat's Avatar
smistthegreat smistthegreat is offline
robots is a hard job
AKA: Brian Smist
FRC #4930 (The Electric Mayhem)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 240
smistthegreat has a reputation beyond reputesmistthegreat has a reputation beyond reputesmistthegreat has a reputation beyond reputesmistthegreat has a reputation beyond reputesmistthegreat has a reputation beyond reputesmistthegreat has a reputation beyond reputesmistthegreat has a reputation beyond reputesmistthegreat has a reputation beyond reputesmistthegreat has a reputation beyond reputesmistthegreat has a reputation beyond reputesmistthegreat has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure

Also, although I agree with the minibot change as a safety concern, I am still displeased with the execution of the minibot idea. Along with being unfair to teams without FTC teams near them, it changes the dynamic of the minibot race. Instead of "Whose unique minibot can get to the top first?" it becomes "Whose robot can get to the tower and have their drivers press a button with 10 seconds left in order to get basically the same minibot as everyone else to start climbing first?"
__________________
University at Buffalo | Mechanical Engineering | Class of 2016
2014-20?? | Mentor | 4930 | The Electric Mayhem
2013 | Mentor | 229 | Division by Zero
2013 | Mentor | 4124 | Integration by Parts

2009-2012 | Student | 1507 | Warlocks
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-12-2011, 12:24 AM
Tom Line's Avatar
Tom Line Tom Line is offline
Raptors can't turn doorknobs.
FRC #1718 (The Fighting Pi)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Armada, Michigan
Posts: 2,509
Tom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure

Quote:
Originally Posted by Navid Shafa View Post
With the limited resources allowed, I'd be surprised to see a minibot that was able to do significant damage, even with the old rule set. The plates are designed to take at least 4-5 Newtons I'd bet even more. Knowing FIRST, these things will be made durable anyways, considering how much wear and tear it will receive at a regional event. I think it's A, a safety issue and B, a uniformity and regulation issue.
Actually, we were concerned we'd blow the top off the scoring pole. Using surgical tubing as an energy storage device in your minibot, you could easily put several hundred pounds of force into spinning your wheels to climb the pole with some very simply engineering. Hint - that's exactly how many teams kicked the soccer balls and launched the track balls. Now picture the same with something weighing under a pound total.

Limiting us to only the electrical energy available in the 12V battery is a smart move on FIRST's part. Limiting us to FTC components only is disappointing. However, it is what it is - we'll move on like everyone else and do our best to figure out a way to make a minibot with no FTC teams to give us parts.
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-12-2011, 12:37 AM
Justin Stiltner's Avatar
Justin Stiltner Justin Stiltner is offline
The big guy
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Blacksburg, Va.
Posts: 305
Justin Stiltner has much to be proud ofJustin Stiltner has much to be proud ofJustin Stiltner has much to be proud ofJustin Stiltner has much to be proud ofJustin Stiltner has much to be proud ofJustin Stiltner has much to be proud ofJustin Stiltner has much to be proud ofJustin Stiltner has much to be proud ofJustin Stiltner has much to be proud ofJustin Stiltner has much to be proud of
Send a message via ICQ to Justin Stiltner Send a message via AIM to Justin Stiltner Send a message via MSN to Justin Stiltner Send a message via Yahoo to Justin Stiltner
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure

Tom,
Read the rules about what you can construct your robot with. You only are required to use the tetrix battery and motors. The rest of the mechanical can be built from standard FRC parts, Aluminum, polycarb, etc!!!

The point bill is trying to make is that as I mentioned, the NXT brick is not required. Currently there are no rules specifically for the mini bot electrical system. As such one could use the two household electrical switches to power your motors. This will allow your robot to be lighter and avoid needing to buy a NXT controller brick and the tetrix motor controller.
__________________
Justin Stiltner
Lead Robot Inspector, VCU Regional
Unmanned Systems Lab, Virginia Tech
KI4URQ
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-12-2011, 12:46 AM
1086VEX's Avatar
1086VEX 1086VEX is offline
VA FIRST Alumni
AKA: Alex Curfman
FRC #0384 (Sparky)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: VA
Posts: 169
1086VEX is a glorious beacon of light1086VEX is a glorious beacon of light1086VEX is a glorious beacon of light1086VEX is a glorious beacon of light1086VEX is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure

Even though 1086 participates in the FTC competition, i was hoping that they wouldn't limit us to just tetrix. For one, it may stop our FTC team from competing in further regional competitions this season which will be sad to see. As many also said its unfair for teams that compete in the VRC. Granted they did give us the option to use other material other than just tetrix i would've much preferred to see the possibility of some VEX or other system based minibots.

As far as the limiting of creativity goes i don't buy it. the whole Tetrix system is about being creative and with the additional materials, there are still many possibilities.
Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-12-2011, 01:07 AM
billbo911's Avatar
billbo911 billbo911 is offline
I prefer you give a perfect effort.
AKA: That's "Mr. Bill"
FRC #2073 (EagleForce)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Elk Grove, Ca.
Posts: 2,345
billbo911 has a reputation beyond reputebillbo911 has a reputation beyond reputebillbo911 has a reputation beyond reputebillbo911 has a reputation beyond reputebillbo911 has a reputation beyond reputebillbo911 has a reputation beyond reputebillbo911 has a reputation beyond reputebillbo911 has a reputation beyond reputebillbo911 has a reputation beyond reputebillbo911 has a reputation beyond reputebillbo911 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin Stiltner View Post
Tom,
Read the rules about what you can construct your robot with. You only are required to use the tetrix battery and motors. The rest of the mechanical can be built from standard FRC parts, Aluminum, polycarb, etc!!!

The point bill is trying to make is that as I mentioned, the NXT brick is not required. Currently there are no rules specifically for the mini bot electrical system. As such one could use the two household electrical switches to power your motors. This will allow your robot to be lighter and avoid needing to buy a NXT controller brick and the tetrix motor controller.
Oh Justin, you let the cat out.

And, unless FIRST changes the rules, there will be exactly 0 NXT controllers in our Minibot. 0<1.
__________________
CalGames 2009 Autonomous Champion Award winner
Sacramento 2010 Creativity in Design winner, Sacramento 2010 Quarter finalist
2011 Sacramento Finalist, 2011 Madtown Engineering Inspiration Award.
2012 Sacramento Semi-Finals, 2012 Sacramento Innovation in Control Award, 2012 SVR Judges Award.
2012 CalGames Autonomous Challenge Award winner ($$$).
2014 2X Rockwell Automation: Innovation in Control Award (CVR and SAC). Curie Division Gracious Professionalism Award.
2014 Capital City Classic Winner AND Runner Up. Madtown Throwdown: Runner up.
2015 Innovation in Control Award, Sacramento.
2016 Chezy Champs Finalist, 2016 MTTD Finalist
Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-12-2011, 01:24 AM
JB987 JB987 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Joe Barry
FRC #0987 (HIGH ROLLERS)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: May 2006
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: LAS VEGAS
Posts: 1,171
JB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure

Quote:
Originally Posted by billbo911 View Post
Oh Justin, you let the cat out.

And, unless FIRST changes the rules, there will be exactly 0 NXT controllers in our Minibot. 0<1.
We are hoping to get by with motors, battery and light switches only as our electrical system but what about " associated,appropriate circuitry)." Will the inspectors apply the FTC standards that do require use of motor controllers and NXT? Bottom line...what constitutes [b]appropriate circuitry[b]?
Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-12-2011, 01:21 AM
Jack Jones Jack Jones is offline
Retired
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Waterford, MI
Posts: 964
Jack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin Stiltner View Post
Tom,
Read the rules about what you can construct your robot with. You only are required to use the tetrix battery and motors. The rest of the mechanical can be built from standard FRC parts, Aluminum, polycarb, etc!!!

The point bill is trying to make is that as I mentioned, the NXT brick is not required. Currently there are no rules specifically for the mini bot electrical system. As such one could use the two household electrical switches to power your motors. This will allow your robot to be lighter and avoid needing to buy a NXT controller brick and the tetrix motor controller.
Justin,

Re-read the rules about MINIBOT construction. The only "required" item is the battery.
__________________
This message is hidden because Jack Jones is on your ignore list.
Reply With Quote
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-12-2011, 01:24 AM
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,704
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Jones View Post
Justin,

Re-read the rules about MINIBOT construction. The only "required" item is the battery.
Jack, that is true. However, if you want your minibot to move vertically, then you need to read Update #1, specifically the blue box that now accompanies <G19>. NXT motors are now required equipment for vertical motion.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 AM.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi