|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Opinion on the use of the FTC Kit for the Mini Bot | |||
| I like and agree with the use of Tetrix for the mini Bot. |
|
64 | 32.82% |
| I think the restriction to only use Tetrix is Unfair. |
|
131 | 67.18% |
| Voters: 195. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Mini Bot - displeasure
Am I the only person out in the Community of FIRST that thinks the constraints of Tetrix (FTC kit) to build the mini bot is UNFAIR!
Up until this year Michigan was discouraged from FTC as FIRST was scared that they would loose FRC Growth due to costs. Now the winds have changed and we are asked to do something that is not possible. Not possible because: 1. Many of us do not have $400.00 for a basic kit + all the extra stuff that will make the amount higher.. 2. No kits are available for purchase. This is the BIG one!!!! If FIRST is pushing FTC you would think that they would have made sure that there was a stock for kits..... after all there are MANY more FRC teams than FTC teams - especially in Michigan. I do get that FIRST is trying to compete with VEX - but at our expense and stress level. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure
a fellow michigan team feeling the constraints this really stinks for us
it also forces all teams to build nearly the same mini bot Last edited by Zachary Pilarsk : 01-11-2011 at 10:12 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure
I definitely second this, as my team is also in a place without many FTC teams, and we just don't have the access to the kit! That's a pretty steep investment to ask of any team, and to force it on some teams simply because they are inconveniently located in relation to FTC teams is quite honestly unfair.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure
I have to say that I think that their idea was a good one, but their execution was poor. If you are unable to acquire one, due to mistakes on their part, that is truly unfair. You would think that if they knew these kind of things were coming, surplus stock would be prepared. I suppose you could do exactly what they want you to do, find the closest FTC team, and hope that they are generous. Sorry for the predicament this has put you and others in, good luck!
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure
Mike I couldn't agree more. Not only is the restriction ridiculous and the availability even worse.
Teams who aren't competing until week 2 might as well just wait and see what everyone else did, because with update #1 there is no point in innovation. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure
I do agree that this is a bit "limiting" but I think you also have to look at it from FIRST's point of view, the biggest thing being damage to their sensors. If one of these bots shoots up in under a second, I think that could do some significant damage to a sensor.
- Sunny |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure
With the limited resources allowed, I'd be surprised to see a minibot that was able to do significant damage, even with the old rule set. The plates are designed to take at least 4-5 Newtons I'd bet even more. Knowing FIRST, these things will be made durable anyways, considering how much wear and tear it will receive at a regional event. I think it's A, a safety issue and B, a uniformity and regulation issue.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure
Also, although I agree with the minibot change as a safety concern, I am still displeased with the execution of the minibot idea. Along with being unfair to teams without FTC teams near them, it changes the dynamic of the minibot race. Instead of "Whose unique minibot can get to the top first?" it becomes "Whose robot can get to the tower and have their drivers press a button with 10 seconds left in order to get basically the same minibot as everyone else to start climbing first?"
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure
Quote:
Limiting us to only the electrical energy available in the 12V battery is a smart move on FIRST's part. Limiting us to FTC components only is disappointing. However, it is what it is - we'll move on like everyone else and do our best to figure out a way to make a minibot with no FTC teams to give us parts. |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure
Tom,
Read the rules about what you can construct your robot with. You only are required to use the tetrix battery and motors. The rest of the mechanical can be built from standard FRC parts, Aluminum, polycarb, etc!!! The point bill is trying to make is that as I mentioned, the NXT brick is not required. Currently there are no rules specifically for the mini bot electrical system. As such one could use the two household electrical switches to power your motors. This will allow your robot to be lighter and avoid needing to buy a NXT controller brick and the tetrix motor controller. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure
Even though 1086 participates in the FTC competition, i was hoping that they wouldn't limit us to just tetrix. For one, it may stop our FTC team from competing in further regional competitions this season which will be sad to see. As many also said its unfair for teams that compete in the VRC. Granted they did give us the option to use other material other than just tetrix i would've much preferred to see the possibility of some VEX or other system based minibots.
As far as the limiting of creativity goes i don't buy it. the whole Tetrix system is about being creative and with the additional materials, there are still many possibilities. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure
Quote:
And, unless FIRST changes the rules, there will be exactly 0 NXT controllers in our Minibot. 0<1. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure
We are hoping to get by with motors, battery and light switches only as our electrical system but what about " associated,appropriate circuitry)." Will the inspectors apply the FTC standards that do require use of motor controllers and NXT? Bottom line...what constitutes [b]appropriate circuitry[b]?
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure
Quote:
Re-read the rules about MINIBOT construction. The only "required" item is the battery. |
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Mini Bot - displeasure
Jack, that is true. However, if you want your minibot to move vertically, then you need to read Update #1, specifically the blue box that now accompanies <G19>. NXT motors are now required equipment for vertical motion.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|