|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
The basic structure of our team's code was to have multiple .cpp files in the same project. Each .cpp was a custom Class for each component for our robot.
The problem was that our robot will refuse to load its own code. ![]() My theory about this was the compiled .o files were not compiled in the correct order in the .out program for the CRIO's bootloader to recongize our main robot's code. Does anyone knows if the .cpp file for our main robot codes should be compiled before or after every other .cpp file? Or does the order of how each .cpp into the .out code shouldn't matter? ![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Multiple .cpp files in Windriver
Normally, the .cpps can be compiled in any order, since they'll all be linked together in the end.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Multiple .cpp files in Windriver
It is also true of the cRIO. The linker runs after each file is compiled. Any unresolved symbols are resolved by the loader at runtime. If the loader can't resolve them, then you get an error.
-Joe |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Multiple .cpp files in Windriver
If you haven't already, use the "target console" in windriver or the serial output on the cRio to find out what symbols aren't loading.
Make sure you're using matching versions of the cRio image (v27, for example) and WPILib. Make sure that all your CPPs are added to windriver and are actually getting compiled (easy test: insert compile errors in them and see if you fail to build your project). Having a definition in a .h file but forgetting to include the cpp will allow you to compile, but it'll fail once it is on the robot. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks for the advice...
That problem was easily resolved.... ..... but now we have a new problem Our team-coded classes are failing to initalize some components. Each time these components are called, The cRIO freaks out and reboots it self. So please, just a few more questions: How "Bug-less-ly" can you initalize a WPILib C++ object via....... Object i.e: Victor myVictor(...) vs. Pointer i.e: DigitalInput* myDI = new DigitalInput(...) What are all the possible program exceptions to look for that relates only when initalizing the object? If we were to put them in a custom C++ class that our main robot will use, of which that custom class will hold all of the required group of electronic objects of the special component on the robot that custom class is made for; What would be a nice, error/exception free example for this? (Sorry if you see this as a run-on) Our team has the recent updates for Windriver, the cRIO, and the Driver Station. So we don't think those shouldn't be the problem. Please, help us..... Thank you all in advance, And thank you everyone else who helped us on this topic so far..... Last edited by divisionByZero0 : 10-02-2011 at 01:04. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Multiple .cpp files in Windriver
What we typically do is instantiate all our component pointers in the Robot constructor, then pass them into the sub-controller classes.
Example: Let's say my robot class is Robot2702 class ArmController2702 { public: ArmController2702(Victor* pClaw, Victor* pArm, Encoder* pArmEncoder) : m_pClaw(pClaw), m_pArm(pArm), m_pEncoder(pEncoder) {} }; class Robot2702 { public: Robot2702() { clawMotor = new Victor(1,2); armMotor = new Victor(3,4); armEncoder = new Encoder(5,6,7,8); armController = new ArmController2702(clawMotor, armMotor,armEncoder); } void OperatorControl() {} void Autonomous() {} }; Checks: -It's a good idea to pass objects in or instantiate them in the constructor. That way, you know they're there before you start using the class. -To figure out what's going on, I believe there is a function you can use called wpi_fatal which will halt execution. You could use it like this if(armEncoder == NULL) wpi_fatal("oh no, our arm is missing!"); then watch the output in the console to see what's going on -Make sure your battery is full. A low battery can cause the robot to reset once a motor draws current and drops the voltage too low. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Works perfectly!!!!!!
Thank you so MUCH ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|