FRC Top 25 week 3 results

[BIGWILLI2081]

What are your thoughts on the week 3 rankings? Any comments about teams, or any teams you think should be higher or lower?

[BGiraud]

Wow. Week 1 we were the #7, two weeks later...off the list. I bet success in our week 6 regional will be a bit late in the season to make up for being out of sight for five weeks.

[Nathan Streeter]

Originally Posted by BGiraud

Wow. Week 1 we were the #7, two weeks later...off the list. I bet success in our week 6 regional will be a bit late in the season to make up for being out of sight for five weeks.

I can certainly empathize with you... we also won a regional (I believe you were #1 seed, we were #3 pick), ranked well the first week (and pretty well the second week), but have since fallen off the list. To be honest though, I was hardly surprised. I think there are two things going on to make the top teams from Week 1 fall off the list, both of which really aren't surprising but should be remembered:

First - and more significantly - there are simply more teams in the "pool" to be voted for. To add on to that Week 1 is even a "smaller week," meaning more than just twice as many teams have since competed. 298 teams competed in Week 1. 1,249 *different* teams have competed in the first three weeks. Basically, only the top 5 teams from Week 1 should have remained on the list, assuming normal distribution. In Week 1, ~8% of 298 competing teams were on the list... by the end of Week 6, ~1.2% of 2,076 teams will be on the list. You don't need me to tell you what that means.

Second, there definitely is some of that "out of sight, out of mind" among this. We're voting, spending a while compiling our lists, trying to keep track of 1,249 teams, and none of that is all too systematic. We'll remember more of the top scorers from Weeks 2 and 3 than from Week 1.

I think it's quite likely 1676 will make the list again, particularly assuming you guys continue to improve! We'll also be competing later (Week 5) and hope to show off our improvements, potentially earning a position back on the list. Best of luck to Pascack this year - you guys are certainly becoming a household number! :-)

To give my impressions on the list... Wow!! That certainly is one list of top-notch teams! As the countdown was continuing, I did often think "man, I thought they'd be higher than that!" but afterwards, I couldn't have said where I'd move that team to! Putting the teams together into such a list is pretty impressive! As always there'll be some bias towards the perennial powerhouses, but every one of those teams is performing at a very high level, no doubt!

[Tom Bottiglieri]

I wouldn't take the results too seriously.

[Alex Cormier]

Originally Posted by Tom Bottiglieri

I wouldn't take the results too seriously.

Aww poor sport.

Originally Posted by BIGWILLI2081

What are your thoughts on the week 3 rankings? Any comments about teams, or any teams you think should be higher or lower?

Ya know, there is already a thread for this? No need to make another one.

[BIGWILLI2081]

Originally Posted by Alex Cormier

Ya know, there is already a thread for this? No need to make another one.

it appears that is just a thread advertising the webcast, and it is not for discussing the results.

[Alex Cormier]

Originally Posted by BIGWILLI2081

it appears that is just a thread advertising the webcast, and it is not for discussing the results.

Whats the point of multiple threads though? It's easier to keep track of, if it's all in one place. Just my thoughts.

[mwtidd]

Originally Posted by Alex Cormier

Whats the point of multiple threads though? It's easier to keep track of, if it's all in one place. Just my thoughts.

now that the discussions been started here, why don't we keep it here. but for future reference, yes lets stick with the original thread

Originally Posted by Tom Bottiglieri

I wouldn't take the results too seriously.

I'm with you on this, this is a very political poll. Many teams will get overlooked. Don't lose sleep if your one of those teams

Originally Posted by BGiraud

Wow. Week 1 we were the #7, two weeks later...off the list. I bet success in our week 6 regional will be a bit late in the season to make up for being out of sight for five weeks.

For what its worth I'm surprised your off the list too, but at the same moment I'm not. People are very attached to robots not points. So where your team may be as valuable as many of the top 25 teams, much of that comes from your minibot. A perfect example of one of those teams is team 16, who yes went undefeated, and had a strong robot, but I think you should be ranked well above them.

other teams that suffered the same fate are 573 and 836

and look at 1985... great robot and minibot, but didn't make the list (mostly because they competed at st. louis which doesn't seem to be a very followed regional)

Originally Posted by Nathan Streeter

I can certainly empathize with you... we also won a regional (I believe you were #1 seed, we were #3 pick), ranked well the first week (and pretty well the second week), but have since fallen off the list. To be honest though, I was hardly surprised. I think there are two things going on to make the top teams from Week 1 fall off the list, both of which really aren't surprising but should be remembered:

....

To give my impressions on the list... Wow!! That certainly is one list of top-notch teams! As the countdown was continuing, I did often think "man, I thought they'd be higher than that!" but afterwards, I couldn't have said where I'd move that team to! Putting the teams together into such a list is pretty impressive! As always there'll be some bias towards the perennial powerhouses, but every one of those teams is performing at a very high level, no doubt!

I do everything by numbers which there has been quite debate about... but that being said, 1519 would have made my top 40 or 50. many of the top 25 teams had lethal and reliable minibots. Theres a good chance if you minibot goes up and triggers every race at smokey mountain you will become a top 25 team

[speedbuggy76]

Very proud of our students to see us at #21 after the win at Peachtree. I know the south isn't usually considered a powerhouse region, so it's nice to see us get some love. I'm sure that we'll fall out before we compete again at North Carolina, but we'll make improvements in the mean time and hopefully jump back in there before Championships.

[mwtidd]

Originally Posted by speedbuggy76

Very proud of our students to see us at #21 after the win at Peachtree. I know the south isn't usually considered a powerhouse region, so it's nice to see us get some love. I'm sure that we'll fall out before we compete again at North Carolina, but we'll make improvements in the mean time and hopefully jump back in there before Championships.

You guys made my top 10
looks like you have an awesome and reliable robot, and a reliable minibot.

[Andrew Y.]

Originally Posted by speedbuggy76

Very proud of our students to see us at #21 after the win at Peachtree. I know the south isn't usually considered a powerhouse region, so it's nice to see us get some love. I'm sure that we'll fall out before we compete again at North Carolina, but we'll make improvements in the mean time and hopefully jump back in there before Championships.

yup, we are looking on making some major changes to our robot thursday of NC. We currently can put up 2 logos and minibot with defense played on us. There were a few matches at peachtree were we almost put up 3 logos( JUST ONE TUBE) but i told our drivers to launch the minibot instead.

Seeing how important shaving seconds is in this game, we hope to acquire tubes faster, hold them tighter, cut our lift time in half, and get our minibot faster.

[mwtidd]

Originally Posted by Andrew Y.

yup, we are looking on making some major changes to our robot thursday of NC. We currently can put up 2 logos and minibot with defense played on us. There were a few matches at peachtree were we almost put up 3 logos( JUST ONE TUBE) but i told our drivers to launch the minibot instead.

Seeing how important shaving seconds is in this game, we hope to acquire tubes faster, hold them tighter, cut our lift time in half, and get our minibot faster.

IMO, if it comes down to reliability or speed I would stick with reliability. Right now your robot is top notch, get greedy and you may create issues. Sit still for even a match and your top 25 value drops incredibly (ask 2054)

For example cutting your lift time in half sounds good on paper, but could result in dropped tubes. It sounds like a very drastic change to an already awesome robot, but of course you are the only one's who can measure the potential ROI against the risk.

[catsylve]

Originally Posted by lineskier

and look at 1985... great robot and minibot, but didn't make the list (mostly because they competed at st. louis which doesn't seem to be a very followed regional)

Thank you for the compliment. The kids had a blast making this robot and just
as much fun competing. As for making polls, we are plenty comfortable just
working under the radar before championship and having fun doing it! That's what it is about.

[Patrick Seeney]

There are only 10 experts that contribute to the poll and of which only 4 did lists last week? Why are the experts limited to only 10? That seems to be a mighty small sample size to be considered the experts to evaluate teams, especially when not even half are contributing.

Once again...I realize this is all for fun and quite honestly the popular poll would seem to give better results...

[EricH]

Originally Posted by Patrick Seeney

There are only 10 experts that contribute to the poll and of which only 4 did lists last week? Why are the experts limited to only 10? That seems to be a mighty small sample size to be considered the experts to evaluate teams, especially when not even half are contributing.

The experts volunteered. That means that only 10 volunteered and actually sent in a list. (I don't know how many volunteered and didn't send in a list yet.) I don't think that 10 is a limit, but a function of willingness to volunteer.