|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Using Second battery to Charge Tanks
Greetings,
After reading a "what do you do in between matches" tread, it seems like it is common practice for some teams to charge their air tanks with one battery, then swap out a fresh battery before heading to the field. I have seen one post on the Q&A on this topic: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I read this as one compressor and one battery mounted on your robot. Therefore, it would be illegal to change the battery after the tanks have been charged. Am I reading the rule correctly? Last edited by wilsonmw04 : 30-03-2011 at 07:19. Reason: typos |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Using Second battery to Charge Tanks
Use battery one to charge the robot up, making sure that it is the robot controlling the compressor, not just hard wired or an external switch.
Turn robot off. Remove battery and replace with a fresh battery two. Go to field and compete. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Using Second battery to Charge Tanks
Quote:
A robot is one compressor and 1 battery. By using two batteries you are effectively using more "electrical energy" than is available in one battery. This is what I am questioning. When I was asking about off board compression, I was told we had to use the same battery as we would use in the match. Why is keeping the compressor on the robot given an exemption to that rule? |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Using Second battery to Charge Tanks
Quote:
Remember, even answers from the Lead Robot Inspector may change as the season progresses and they all come to a common rules interpretation. I don't recall any such Q&A though. I think your issue here is how the question is framed and (presumably answered by the GDC). The answer you received appears to simply be addressing the issue that the compressor must be powered through the robot by the robot battery whenever it is operated, not that batteries cannot be changed. The robot can only be powered by a single battery while in a match. A match doesn't begin in the pit or on the queue or in a previous on-field appearance where pressure wasn't releaved afterwards. A match begins when the field sounds. Last edited by Mark McLeod : 30-03-2011 at 12:21. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Using Second battery to Charge Tanks
Quote:
From my POV once you use the battery to compress air in your tanks, that battery becomes part of the robot for that match. If you removed the battery after the compression, you are using two batteries for a match. Mark, The question regarding swapping batteries was asked in the Q & A and they directed the petitioner to R69. I'm just not sure how that answers the question. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Using Second battery to Charge Tanks
Quote:
![]() |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Using Second battery to Charge Tanks
Quote:
Thanks for being lighthearted about this. This is not a hypothetical for my team. With such a large set of tanks this year, it take over one minute to charge our system. If we could do that with another battery it could be a substantial advantage for the team. I just don't see how it jives with the rules. I know others do it; the GDC is rather vague on the issue. I just don't like gray areas. It get's folk in trouble and feelings hurt. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Using Second battery to Charge Tanks
Quote:
![]() |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Using Second battery to Charge Tanks
I don't believe any rule supports your self-imposed position.
I don't beleve the GDC supports your position, otherwise, they would say so. I believe only one battery can be used during a match. A match begins with the field sound and ends with the refs all clear flag. (it doesn't end with a field sound this season). I don't accept the stored energy argument (even without the evidence of a rule), otherwise, springs, elastic tubing and other potential energy storage is also suspect. Thereby excluding human muscle power from the robot, as well, if the battery is the sole source of energy. My beliefs don't constrain the GDC, but are what I will advise any team that asks. I'm rooting for your students. ![]() Last edited by Mark McLeod : 30-03-2011 at 14:08. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Using Second battery to Charge Tanks
As am I. They are a great group of kids. Dude, just saw you'll be at VCU in a week. I'll look you up. It will be nice to match a face to a CD tag. Last edited by wilsonmw04 : 30-03-2011 at 12:52. |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Using Second battery to Charge Tanks
Quote:
I'm a mentor with team 2402 from Fredericksburg. I'm older than my photo appears (my hair is graying now) -that was taken more than 10 years ago. I get around... Go Rams! Last edited by Mark McLeod : 30-03-2011 at 15:27. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Using Second battery to Charge Tanks
So... has anyone come to a conclusion on this issue?
It is very clear that the robot must be controlling the compressor when it is filling the tanks - on board or not. There is a very interesting question regarding switching the battery after the compression is complete. For many robots this is not a real "game changer", but at least one example that's been mentioned on these forums is a robot that requires 7 minutes to compress its tanks! This is roughly about 40% of the total energy output from the battery in the duration of a match. Yes, it is legal to store this much energy in springs on the robot, but there is no rule saying that "springs must be stretched/compressed under the control of the ROBOT". It seems to me that the answer to this question could indeed be a "game changer" in certain circumstances. When does a robot become the ROBOT? -Mr. Van Coach, Robodox |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Using Second battery to Charge Tanks
Quote:
![]() I believe the intention of the ruling is to make sure the pneumatics are charged and controlled under the same rules and conditions (and safety systems) any other robot with the compressor on-board would have. This makes sense, and while cumbersome, I can understand it. However I fail to see any way in which using a separate 'practice' robot battery bypasses any of those particular intended restrictions, or otherwise gives you an advantage or presents a danger, and thus I would have interpreted the ruling to allow you to swap your battery between charging the pneumatics and competing on the field. That said, I'm only me, and my name isn't nearly popular enough to sway inspectors or refs ask the GDC for this exact situation. I believe they will rule in your favor, but having it confirmed can help everyone rest easier.Matt |
|
#14
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Using Second battery to Charge Tanks
As long as the "practice" battery is connected to the robot's electrical system via the red Anderson connector, and the compressor is connected to a Spike relay on the robot, then yes, you can use the practice battery to charge the air tanks and then swap in a fresh "match" battery before heading to the field.
If you powered the compressor DIRECTLY from the practice battery, bypassing the robot's control system entirely, that would not be permitted. Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Using Second battery to Charge Tanks
This is one of those rules I've always thought was silly. As long as teams are using the proper safety mechanisms, why does the ROBOT battery have to power the off-board compressor.
I've always seen nearly every team with an off-board compressor charge their system, THEN change the battery immediately before the MATCH. 1075 built a robotic cart years ago (it hasn't been used this year, due to malfunctions we haven't had time to fix). It runs an IFI control system, just like our 2000-2008 robots did, (its actually running the system from our 2004 or 2006 robot), uses Black Jaguars to control its drive motors (they're 24VDC motors), and has a separate 12V system to power the control system, and various 12V components, including lights, music, horns, etc (yes, we know musical carts in pits is a no-no, so we generally don't use it at official competitions). We also built a compressor onto the cart, with all the proper interlocks (pressure switch shutoff, etc) but in recent years have not been allowed to use it to pressurize the robot. (We've still used it for blowing metal filings away, and blowing up trackballs) It gives absolutely zero competitive advantage, and I don't understand why we're not allowed to use it, since its equally safe. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|