Go to Post "You know you're a robotics kid when you sit on Chief Delphi and hit refresh over and over again waiting for new pictures and videos of other teams" - pwnageNick [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Electrical
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 22:00
mattiej's Avatar
mattiej mattiej is offline
Programmer Guy
FRC #3413 (Mad Cows)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Coppell Texas
Posts: 54
mattiej is an unknown quantity at this point
Workaround for the Kinect?

I know there have been multiple threads, but I haven't seen (I may have missed it) anyone suggest using a wireless USB.

This particular one uses 5VDC, which would be perfect for the robot. I think I am missing something however? I think it is okay rule wise (as long as we get approved) but will it entirely work on the robot?
__________________


Man pretending to be interested: "So how does this robot of yours work?"
Me tired of man pretending to be interested: "Magic. And Purple Yetis."
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 22:05
Christopher149 Christopher149 is offline
Registered User
FRC #0857 (Superior Roboworks) FTC 10723 (SnowBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Houghton, MI
Posts: 1,100
Christopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Workaround for the Kinect?

Quote:
<R55>
One D-Link DAP-1522 is the only permitted device for communicating to and from the Robot during the match. All
signals must originate from the Operator Console and be transmitted to the Robot via the official Arena hardware.
No other form of wireless communications shall be used to communicate to, from or within the Robot (e.g. radio
modems from previous FIRST competitions and Bluetooth devices are not permitted on the Robot during
competition).
So, probably not.
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 22:08
mattiej's Avatar
mattiej mattiej is offline
Programmer Guy
FRC #3413 (Mad Cows)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Coppell Texas
Posts: 54
mattiej is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Workaround for the Kinect?

What about this rule? It wouldn't be directly connected to the cRIO

Quote:
[R67]

Any decorations that involve broadcasting a signal to/from the Robot, such as remote cameras, must be approved by FIRST (via e-mail to frcteams@usfirst.org) prior to the event and tested for communications interference at the venue. Such devices, if reviewed and approved, are excluded from Rule [R55].
__________________


Man pretending to be interested: "So how does this robot of yours work?"
Me tired of man pretending to be interested: "Magic. And Purple Yetis."
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 22:10
Christopher149 Christopher149 is offline
Registered User
FRC #0857 (Superior Roboworks) FTC 10723 (SnowBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Houghton, MI
Posts: 1,100
Christopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Workaround for the Kinect?

So, what is a decoration?
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2012, 22:12
mattiej's Avatar
mattiej mattiej is offline
Programmer Guy
FRC #3413 (Mad Cows)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Coppell Texas
Posts: 54
mattiej is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Workaround for the Kinect?

I would imagine this it includes everything from LEDs to other cameras, based on the wording of the rule

Quote:
[R67]

Any decorations that involve broadcasting a signal to/from the Robot, such as remote cameras
Also in R84

Quote:
Examples of prohibited wireless systems include, but are not limited to, active wireless network cards and Bluetooth devices. For the case of FRC, a motion sensing input device (e.g. Microsoft Kinect) is not considered wireless communication and is allowed.
__________________


Man pretending to be interested: "So how does this robot of yours work?"
Me tired of man pretending to be interested: "Magic. And Purple Yetis."

Last edited by mattiej : 08-01-2012 at 22:16.
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2012, 03:59
Sparks333's Avatar
Sparks333 Sparks333 is offline
Robotics Engineer
AKA: Dane B.
FRC #1425 (Wilsonville Robotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Wilsonville, Oregon
Posts: 184
Sparks333 is a glorious beacon of lightSparks333 is a glorious beacon of lightSparks333 is a glorious beacon of lightSparks333 is a glorious beacon of lightSparks333 is a glorious beacon of lightSparks333 is a glorious beacon of light
Send a message via AIM to Sparks333
Re: Workaround for the Kinect?

Having been on a team that actually used a camera on the robot as a decoration prior to the cRio switchover, I can attest to this: they are very stingy about what is considered a decoration, and it appears they have a strict definition of decoration that revolves around non-functionality. We were allowed to put a camera on as decoration and record what went on in the robot (we actually stored to onboard memory for retrieval after the match), but every single judge wanted to make absolutely sure we weren't using it for real-time driving, because then it wouldn't be a decoration anymore (this was before video was allowed back at the driver station - that has since changed, but their definition of decoration has not). Since that is what you'd be doing with the wireless system, it couldn't be logically defined as a decoration, and so wouldn't fall under the jurisdiction of [R67], meaning [R55] all the way. Sorry - no wireless USB for you.
__________________
ICs do weird things when voltage is run out of spec.

I love to take things apart. The fact that they work better when I put them back together it just a bonus.

http://www.ravenblack.net/random/surreal.html
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2012, 08:52
DavidGitz's Avatar
DavidGitz DavidGitz is offline
Lead Technical Advisor
FRC #1208 (MeTool Brigade)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: O'Fallon, IL
Posts: 341
DavidGitz has much to be proud ofDavidGitz has much to be proud ofDavidGitz has much to be proud ofDavidGitz has much to be proud ofDavidGitz has much to be proud ofDavidGitz has much to be proud ofDavidGitz has much to be proud ofDavidGitz has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to DavidGitz Send a message via MSN to DavidGitz Send a message via Yahoo to DavidGitz
Re: Workaround for the Kinect?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparks333 View Post
(we actually stored to onboard memory for retrieval after the match).
How were you using this video? For strategy/analyzing how your robot was working/anything like that? Or for a marketing/PR standpoint? If it's the former, it is still not a non-functional decoration because it gives you an edge over the other teams.

[R05] Any non-functional decorations included on the Robot must not affect the outcome of the match and must be in the spirit of Gracious Professionalism.

Also for the OP:
4.1 ROBOT RULES
...When reading these rules, please use technical common sense (engineering thinking) rather than “lawyering” the interpretation and splitting hairs over the precise wording in an attempt to find loopholes. Try to understand the reasoning behind a rule.
__________________
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2012, 13:04
Sparks333's Avatar
Sparks333 Sparks333 is offline
Robotics Engineer
AKA: Dane B.
FRC #1425 (Wilsonville Robotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Wilsonville, Oregon
Posts: 184
Sparks333 is a glorious beacon of lightSparks333 is a glorious beacon of lightSparks333 is a glorious beacon of lightSparks333 is a glorious beacon of lightSparks333 is a glorious beacon of lightSparks333 is a glorious beacon of light
Send a message via AIM to Sparks333
Re: Workaround for the Kinect?

It was most definitely for PR use. It was mounted in such a way that you could not see much of the robot, and, the manipulator rarely entered frame.

Sparks
__________________
ICs do weird things when voltage is run out of spec.

I love to take things apart. The fact that they work better when I put them back together it just a bonus.

http://www.ravenblack.net/random/surreal.html
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2012, 01:43
theprgramerdude theprgramerdude is offline
WPI Freshman
AKA: Alex
FRC #2503 (Warrior Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Brainerd, Minnesota
Posts: 347
theprgramerdude has much to be proud oftheprgramerdude has much to be proud oftheprgramerdude has much to be proud oftheprgramerdude has much to be proud oftheprgramerdude has much to be proud oftheprgramerdude has much to be proud oftheprgramerdude has much to be proud oftheprgramerdude has much to be proud oftheprgramerdude has much to be proud oftheprgramerdude has much to be proud of
Re: Workaround for the Kinect?

If you're using the original cRio, what could be done is take a USB-to-Serial chip and hook the USB up to the RS-232 port and start a serial connection.
__________________
Attending: MN Duluth Regional
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2012, 07:47
Alan Anderson's Avatar
Alan Anderson Alan Anderson is offline
Software Architect
FRC #0045 (TechnoKats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Kokomo, Indiana
Posts: 9,113
Alan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Workaround for the Kinect?

Quote:
Originally Posted by theprgramerdude View Post
a USB-to-Serial chip
Those plug into a computer's USB connection and provide a serial port. You want something that goes in the other direction. I don't think you'll find one that's any simpler than something like a USB-host-equipped Arduino or similar embedded microcontroller.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi