|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Team Update #2
I'm guessing this thread won't consist of 8 pages of complaints
![]() Being able to use cylinders at our discretion is great. I'm happy. Though, I doubt my team will take advantage of the ruling. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Team Update #2
Hmmm, can we use ANY pneumatic storage tank? I can think of some pretty huge ones that would meet the pneumatics safety requirements.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Team Update #2
Quote:
Engineering is all tradeoffs. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2011 Team Update #2
Trading?
What? Stock market time! ![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Team Update #2
I believe that if we go with pneumatics, then if we end up a few pounds under the limit... AIR TANKS!
|
|
#6
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: 2011 Team Update #2
Oops - thanks to whoever closed my thread in the other forum; I didn't see this one when I hunted quickly - I should have searched.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2011 Team Update #2
Also consider that bigger tanks take longer to pressurize.
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2011 Team Update #2
I am not able to download the file. Anyone else having problems?
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Team Update #2
I can't download it either.
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2011 Team Update #2
I just opened it again, and it appears it would let me save it.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Team Update #2
Can anyone copy and paste the rule changes on this thead for thouse of us that can't open the pdf?
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Team Update #2
To sum it up:
Minibots must be deployed completely below the line. <R66> now amended to include pneumatic cylinders and storage tanks of any sort. <R92-O> now specifies "electrical hookup" wire (as opposed to metal wire that could be formed into springs, etc) |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2011 Team Update #2
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2011 Team Update #2
Quote:
![]() |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Team Update #2
Quote:
I think they added the language and didn't look at the penalty The penalty SHOULD be Red Card for deploying your minibot on a different tower and a standard tower disable for starting too high... that would be much more fitting... I think you SHOULD get a RED CARD for trying to mess up another team's shot at the minibot by deploying on the opponent's tower. But for a slight discretion on your own tower you should just have the tower disabled... Much more reasonable penalty... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|