Go to Post My Worst Decision of the Week?? Reading this thread!! :) :) :cool: :cool: - BobC [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2011, 00:01
TubaMorg TubaMorg is offline
Programmermechanicalelect ricalcoach
AKA: Dan
FRC #1480 (Robatos Locos)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 450
TubaMorg has a reputation beyond reputeTubaMorg has a reputation beyond reputeTubaMorg has a reputation beyond reputeTubaMorg has a reputation beyond reputeTubaMorg has a reputation beyond reputeTubaMorg has a reputation beyond reputeTubaMorg has a reputation beyond reputeTubaMorg has a reputation beyond reputeTubaMorg has a reputation beyond reputeTubaMorg has a reputation beyond reputeTubaMorg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mechanum Gear Ratio Recommendations

We've always just gone direct drive straight from the tough box (12:1) with no problems.
__________________
I don't need a signature.
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2011, 00:51
bakejame's Avatar
bakejame bakejame is offline
Registered User
FRC #2993
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: North Logan, Utah
Posts: 15
bakejame has a spectacular aura aboutbakejame has a spectacular aura aboutbakejame has a spectacular aura about
Re: Mechanum Gear Ratio Recommendations

Thanks everyone for your suggestions. I guess I need to order some larger sprockets for the wheels (we only have 26 tooth or smaller). We really want to use the CIMple Box due to its lower weight. With the 4.8:1 GR out of the box and a 12 tooth driver sprocket, I need to get a 28 to 30 tooth sprocket at the wheels to get close to the 12:1 GR.

By the way, how was it to strafe sideways at the 12:1 GR? Did it still perform pretty well?
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2011, 00:58
dtengineering's Avatar
dtengineering dtengineering is offline
Teaching Teachers to Teach Tech
AKA: Jason Brett
no team (British Columbia FRC teams)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,817
dtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mechanum Gear Ratio Recommendations

Here's what 12:1 banebots direct drive to 8" AM mecanums looks like.

http://www.youtube.com/dtengineering#p/u/1/gyn9e0cT3-A

Heck... that thing even picks up tubes. Add a minibot and you're good to go.

Jason

P.S. If we rebuilt that machine all over again, I'd be tempted to consider the 16:1... the 12:1 had lots of speed, but I think the 16:1 would offer better acelleration and more precise control. I'd also use the Jaguar speed controllers to implement closed-loop speed control on the controller so you can take the PID loops and encoder reading out of the programming process. Not that it is hard to do that in labview... but back in the PIC days you actually had to have students who knew how to program in order to get 4 PID loops running! With labview and/or the jags, you just set your coefficients and go back to building the minibot.
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2011, 01:09
bakejame's Avatar
bakejame bakejame is offline
Registered User
FRC #2993
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: North Logan, Utah
Posts: 15
bakejame has a spectacular aura aboutbakejame has a spectacular aura aboutbakejame has a spectacular aura about
Re: Mechanum Gear Ratio Recommendations

Quote:
Originally Posted by dtengineering View Post
Here's what 12:1 banebots direct drive to 8" AM mecanums looks like.

http://www.youtube.com/dtengineering#p/u/1/gyn9e0cT3-A

Heck... that thing even picks up tubes. Add a minibot and you're good to go.

Jason

P.S. If we rebuilt that machine all over again, I'd be tempted to consider the 16:1... the 12:1 had lots of speed, but I think the 16:1 would offer better acelleration and more precise control. I'd also use the Jaguar speed controllers to implement closed-loop speed control on the controller so you can take the PID loops and encoder reading out of the programming process. Not that it is hard to do that in labview... but back in the PIC days you actually had to have students who knew how to program in order to get 4 PID loops running! With labview and/or the jags, you just set your coefficients and go back to building the minibot.
We are definitely using the Jaguars, but will be using CIM motors. The larger motors should give us the extra torque needed for acceleration and, as a result, more precise control. By the way, I really liked the arm design you all came up with. Nice compact design.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:41.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi