|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is the minibot independent from the FMS?
Well, a "dummy" minibot could potentially just consist of two wheels and a limitswitch with proper wiring that just powers the motors when the limitswitch is active. It would be a lot easier to "knock off and catch" this minibot than it would to add the weight of an NXT to make it go back down.
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Is the minibot independent from the FMS?
There might be other ways to get it to "know" that it has to come back down, and make that happen. Think outside the control system box
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Is the minibot independent from the FMS?
I suspect that it might be possible to rig a set of limit switches to reverse the motor power, and lock them down to keep it reversed. Haven't actually tried it, though.
|
|
#4
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Is the minibot independent from the FMS?
Finally found a use for those silly Nifty Nabbers from 2009!! Just put a little "handle" on your robot and use the Nifty Nabber!
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is the minibot independent from the FMS?
I'm thinking that if the motors just turned off, the minibot would just coast back down. This depends on the design of course. If the switch that turns if off, shorts the motor leads together this would provide braking.
Also the force required to activate the switch is 2-4 newtons. That converts to .44 to .88 pounds. Is that the right conversion? Thats quite a bit. If teams don't design the minibots to push that hard, the switch won't be activated. Brian |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|