Legality of Jaguar closed-loop control modes

[Stuart]

Originally Posted by jtechau

Personally I'm fine with that decision (strange as that decision may seem). It's one thing to use closed-loop control. It's another to implement it in your own code, especially if you're using PID control. I'd much rather have my team know how the stuff works, than just be able to hook it up and see it do its magic.

After all, that's pretty much what FIRST is all about.

While I agree with the sentiment. I disagree with the argument.

a few years ago Dean talked about the idea that technology is something that is new to the generation. for his grandfathers generation the car was technology, for his generation the internet is technology, for this generation . . well we dont know. The point is each time we progress, the wild and amazing things of the past become base and mundane ( I would say transparent). When I was in high school ( circa 2004) it was all 15 pin analog ports and limit switches. if we wanted to do channel mixing that was like 2 weeks worth of coding, and trig for getting relitive positioning of the field, forget it!( I often wonder if those doing FIRST in 1994 would take a look at what I did in 2004 and say "well all the hard stuff is done for him what is he learning"). But now channel mixing and trig functions are mundane they are transparent, we talk about the underlying principals drop in the VI and move on. does this make the season any less hard? No work will always rise to its own level. This just pushes us to find something else thats new and interesting and exciting (technology).

[drakesword]

Raise your hand if your team will be programming and testing both methods in the unlikely case of an overturn

*raises hand*