Go to Post Mountain Dew and Taco Bell. Nom Nom Nom. - R.C. [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2011, 16:44
Basel A's Avatar
Basel A Basel A is offline
It's pronounced Basl with a soft s
AKA: @BaselThe2nd
FRC #3322 (Eagle Imperium)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 1,946
Basel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Another chapter to the 6WD vs. Mecanum debate

Of course, 469 in 2010, with their shifting, was no ordinary machine: both really quick and incredibly powerful. But if you check out the below video, you see them put a really nice move on our driver, then just shove us out of the way. It was really impressive to see, and I almost applauded..

youtube.com/watch?v=qAMlb2iugUs
__________________
Team 2337 | 2009-2012 | Student
Team 3322 | 2014-Present | College Student
“Be excellent in everything you do and the results will just happen.”
-Paul Copioli
Reply With Quote
  #32   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2011, 16:47
Oblarg Oblarg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eli Barnett
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,116
Oblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Another chapter to the 6WD vs. Mecanum debate

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesBrown View Post
I think the advantage to 6wd is pretty obvious and pretty much common knowledge, it is simple, reliable and easy to manuever. There is a reason that the majority of teams on Einstein every year seem to be 6 or 8wd
I think that's probably because the majority of teams in FIRST don't use mecanum. Walk around the pits at regionals if you don't believe me.

Mecanum is unequivocally more maneuverable than 6wd, and mechanically it's no more complex (and you can get working drive code online, I believe our team has published ours), and it's perfectly reliable - our team has never had a major drive failure (one which made our drive unusable or even less maneuverable than a 4wd) due to the mecanum wheels.

I encourage you to build a mecanum bot and push against a 6wd with it. I think you'll be surprised at how hard it is to actually get the mecanum to skid.
__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"

Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016
Reply With Quote
  #33   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2011, 16:58
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is offline
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,797
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: Another chapter to the 6WD vs. Mecanum debate

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oblarg View Post
I think that's probably because the majority of teams in FIRST don't use mecanum. Walk around the pits at regionals if you don't believe me.
Maybe that's because it's not as good - the VAST majority of the best teams in FIRST don't use mecanum, and it's not because they're stupid.

Quote:
Mecanum is unequivocally more maneuverable than 6wd,
Is it? Honestly? I think 6wd maneuverability is quite underrated - there's a reason there's literally never been a mecanum on Einstein.

Quote:
I encourage you to build a mecanum bot and push against a 6wd with it. I think you'll be surprised at how hard it is to actually get the mecanum to skid.
We've pushed plenty of mecanum bots no problem (and yes, the rollers spin)
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
--2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
.
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
-- 2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design -- 2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
-- 2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
-- 2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 MN 10K Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
Reply With Quote
  #34   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2011, 17:08
TroyCDH's Avatar
TroyCDH TroyCDH is offline
Registered User
FRC #2450 (Radierbots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Saint Paul Minnesota
Posts: 31
TroyCDH is on a distinguished road
Re: Another chapter to the 6WD vs. Mecanum debate

Yes 6WD can push harder than Mecanums. So? I did not catch Dean saying this year's main goal was to push around other robots. In fact I see there is a rule against pinning and contact during certain match times.

Next year, when the goal is simply to push each other I will be on my way to northern Minnesota for these:

http://www.mattracks.com/

Good luck to all, have a safe build season!
Reply With Quote
  #35   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2011, 17:22
Ian Curtis Ian Curtis is offline
Best Available Data
FRC #1778 (Chill Out!)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 2,521
Ian Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Another chapter to the 6WD vs. Mecanum debate

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oblarg View Post
I encourage you to build a mecanum bot and push against a 6wd with it. I think you'll be surprised at how hard it is to actually get the mecanum to skid.
When the Blue Alliance comes back up, watch matches with team 40 in 2006. They had a mecanum drive with a drop down "traction plate" to stay in place when they wanted to. When they were on the mecanum wheels, they got pushed all over the field, when the traction plate was down, teams rammed them until their angle was off and with the mecanum wheels they couldn't fight back for their initial position.

Mecanum wheels have strengths that traditional skid steer drives do not. Pushing is not one of them.
__________________
CHILL OUT! | Aero Stability & Control Engineer
Adam Savage's Obsessions (TED Talk) (Part 2)
It is much easier to call someone else a genius than admit to yourself that you are lazy. - Dave Gingery
Reply With Quote
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2011, 17:23
XaulZan11's Avatar
XaulZan11 XaulZan11 is offline
Registered User
AKA: John Christiansen
FRC #1732
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 1,329
XaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to XaulZan11
Re: Another chapter to the 6WD vs. Mecanum debate

Quote:
Originally Posted by Basel A View Post
I feel a little bad using this as an example because I think you did a great job on 469 and had a great robot last year, but I see too many mecanum drives like this one in this match. In theory mecanum can work welll, butt too often teams don't strafe or take advantage the 'ability to drive circles around slow 6 wheel drives' (which I'm still waiting of a video of, btw).

I think mecanum can be an effective drive system but 97 times out of 100 6 wheel is just better. The best utilization of a mecanum drive I've seen was 2171 in 2008, but their drive still wasn't as good as 1114 and the other 6 wheel drives that year. I think there is a reason none of the elite teams have used mecanum drives.
Reply With Quote
  #37   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2011, 17:33
klmx30302's Avatar
klmx30302 klmx30302 is offline
Is ready for MAYHEM In Merrimack!
AKA: Kevin McCarthy
FRC #0166 (Chop Shop)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Merrimack,NH
Posts: 221
klmx30302 is a jewel in the roughklmx30302 is a jewel in the roughklmx30302 is a jewel in the rough
Re: Another chapter to the 6WD vs. Mecanum debate

I feel like mecanum bots will do pretty well this year. We also used mecanum in 2007. We resurrected our 2007 chassis and put the electronics from last years robot to do prototyping/let software have more then 6 hours with the robot. I just don't see a well designed mecanum bot having problems out-maneuvering a 6wd bot.
Here are our 2007 drive tests:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_vUYyJAkCc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbluSr2Mf5Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0XN6iSvCXo
Here are a few more:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L01Ok-6AMhM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXGbo3tQapE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnoMhVEqx1c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oamC4esbGfI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfOLERgWQrU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdS8BmQom58&NR=1
__________________
Unofficial Team 166 Videographer
Our team motto...
"THINK!, There must be a harder way!"



Last edited by klmx30302 : 21-01-2011 at 17:40. Reason: Found More of our vids!
Reply With Quote
  #38   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2011, 17:39
Dale's Avatar
Dale Dale is offline
Head Coach & Mentor
AKA: Dale Yocum
FRC #1540 (Flaming Chickens)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 504
Dale has much to be proud ofDale has much to be proud ofDale has much to be proud ofDale has much to be proud ofDale has much to be proud ofDale has much to be proud ofDale has much to be proud ofDale has much to be proud ofDale has much to be proud of
Re: Another chapter to the 6WD vs. Mecanum debate

Every fall I do the drive train presentation at FIRSTFare, our FRC technical conference in Portland. I go through all of the teams who were either division winners or finalists at the championships and try to determine what basic system they used for their drive train. Obviously the game has a lot to do with what works but here are the results from 2008 and 2010:

2008 Championship Division Winners and Finalists
14 Six Wheel with traction wheels all around
2 Six Wheel with omnis
2 Four wheel with omnis
2 Mecanum
2 Crab Drive
1 Four wheel rack and pinion.

2010 Championship Division Winners and Finalists
2 Four Wheel
5 Six Wheel
10 Eight Wheel
2 Nine Wheel (148, 217 partnership)
1 Mecanum
3 Crab Drive
1 Treads

I left out 2009, the Lunacy year, because there the drive train was more or less determined by FIRST. I might have gotten a few of these wrong because I'm just going by what I can observe from the team's website and Blue Alliance video.

What you can see is that very few Mecanum drives make it to the top levels of competition. How much of that is because many of these elite teams have a drive base they've developed over the years that they are happy with and how much of it is because Mecanum doesn't readily translate into a competitive advantage FOR THOSE GAMES is something we won't know. This might well be the year that Mecanum breaks out...or not.
__________________
2016 PNW Championship Chairman's; 2016 Winner Oregon City District, 2015 PNW Championship Chairman's; 2015 PNW District Engineering Inspiration; 2015 PNW District Finalist; 2014 PNW Championship Chairman's; 2014 Championship Innovation in Controls; 2013 Chairman's (Oregon); 2013 Finalist (OKC); 2012 Winner (OKC); 2012 Chairman's (OKC); 2012 Woody Flowers (Oregon); 2011 Volunteer of the Year (Oregon); 2011 Finalist & Captain (San Diego); 2011 Innovation in Control (San Diego); 2010 & 2007 Chairman's (Oregon); 2010 Regional Champions (Colorado); 2010 Innovation in Control (Colorado); 2009 & 2008 Engineering Inspiration (Oregon); 2008 Regional Champions (Oregon); 2007 Regional Finalist (Oregon); 2005 Rookie Inspiration (PNW)
Reply With Quote
  #39   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2011, 17:54
Oblarg Oblarg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eli Barnett
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,116
Oblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Another chapter to the 6WD vs. Mecanum debate

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
Maybe that's because it's not as good - the VAST majority of the best teams in FIRST don't use mecanum, and it's not because they're stupid.



Is it? Honestly? I think 6wd maneuverability is quite underrated - there's a reason there's literally never been a mecanum on Einstein.



We've pushed plenty of mecanum bots no problem (and yes, the rollers spin)
No, I think there are plenty of teams who have never tried it - I know that 449 had never used mecanum until '07, and since then we've used it in both games which allowed it. There's a lot of stigma around mecanum based on this myth that it gets pushed all over the place - anyone who has had experience driving a mecanum bot will tell you that this is nowhere near as big an issue as you think it is.

No, the rollers do not spin unless your wheels are already skidding - the physics of this has been explained multiple times earlier in the thread. As has been mentioned earlier in the thread, the only power difference mecanum suffers is the fact that the wheels skid sooner than traction wheels. You will never start pushing a mecanum bot and see the rollers immediately start spinning - it's the same reason that acceleration of mecanum drive is identical to that of a traction drive.

Yes, it is unequivocally more maneuverable. You turn just as well, you accelerate just as well, and you have an extra axis of movement. If that's not unequivocally more maneuverable, then nothing is.
__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"

Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016
Reply With Quote
  #40   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2011, 18:08
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,832
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Another chapter to the 6WD vs. Mecanum debate

I'm going to throw a wrench into the works.

Back in 2005, 330 had this debate a bit ourselves. We decided to work a compromise: We'd build our frame to run both (quite easy to do) and rig it with 6WD and rig our kit frame with mecanum (6" fully nylon wheels, KOP trannies from that time frame--single speed, single CIM). At that time, our 2003 robot was still operational, so we decided to test against that (4WD, 2-speed, drill motor transmissions).

We could not beat the 4WD in speed. We could not get around it for shooting a gap between two goals. I distinctly remember the mecanum losing a push test, and after the first 5-10 seconds, it wasn't a contest! If we'd been hit trying to cap, we'd have lost position, every time we took a hit. We had trouble strafing with an off-balance load (tetra on a pole). If I had video, I'd post it. Just on motors, we should have been able to push the 2003 robot, 4 CIMs versus 2 drill motors, roughly equal weights.

The 6WD stayed on the competition robot. To this day, 330 has not done a competition mecanum. Not because we're scared to, but because the GDC has yet to give us a game where it's an advantage given our play style. The only competition omni-directional drive we've ever done was a 6WD rotational drivebase on our 2009 robot, because it fit a key part of our game plan (avoid getting pinned if possible).

Oh, and one other thing: At that point, we had two years of experience with small-scale mecanum, both programming and hardware.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote
  #41   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2011, 18:22
Kevin Sevcik's Avatar
Kevin Sevcik Kevin Sevcik is offline
(Insert witty comment here)
FRC #0057 (The Leopards)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,761
Kevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Sevcik Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin Sevcik
Re: Another chapter to the 6WD vs. Mecanum debate

I think it should probably be noted that declarations about how rare mecanums were on Einstein don't really mean much till after 2007. At least.

2007 was the first year andymark offered mecanum wheels. So pre-2007, the only teams attempting this would be teams with the time and patience to make their own wheels and try them out.

Even then, I think it's a little arguable that they've had much of a chance at shining since 2007. Look at the run down:
2007: Debut of AM mecanums, with all the first-run, low volume problems.
2008: Mecanums arguably weren't much of an advantage.
2009: Lunacy, slicks only
2010: Bumps and plywood under the field reduced the effectiveness of mecanums.

So I don't think there have been all that many years where mecanums were both commonly available and obviously useful for that year's game. Now that may be because they just aren't ever going to be useful to the game, but I'd want a few more games to actually make that call.
__________________
The difficult we do today; the impossible we do tomorrow. Miracles by appointment only.

Lone Star Regional Troubleshooter
Reply With Quote
  #42   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2011, 18:25
Unsung FIRST Hero
JVN JVN is offline
@JohnVNeun
AKA: John Vielkind-Neun
FRC #0148 (Robowranglers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Greenville, Tx
Posts: 3,159
JVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Another chapter to the 6WD vs. Mecanum debate

How much power-loss is there strafing sideways with a "normal" mecanum drivetrain?
Specifically -- how much current draw is there on a single motor?
How fast can you gear up the drivetrain before that "sideways" current draw becomes undesirable?
If you gear to a safe speed (without undesirable current draw), will you be making a tradeoff on forward/backward speed (i.e. would you have geared faster otherwise?)

In a game which emphasizes full field sprints, I think the "safe" gearing for a mecanum is just too slow -- but that is just my opinion... (one which is founded on calculations and engineering analysis, plus some anecdotal evidence on the side... yes, 148 build a mecanum drive this fall, and we hated it).

If you're a team debating between 6WD or mecanum my opinion is you should go 6WD. I promise you won't regret it.

However -- The most important thing is that whatever you do, you get it built quickly, get your mechanism on it, and start testing and improving as soon as possible! The more testing and driver practice you get the happier you'll be.

-John
__________________
In the interest of full disclosure: I work for VEX Robotics a subsidiary of Innovation First International (IFI) Crown Supplier & Proud Supporter of FIRST
Reply With Quote
  #43   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2011, 18:27
sgreco's Avatar
sgreco sgreco is offline
Registered User
AKA: Steven Greco
FRC #2079
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Millis
Posts: 1,031
sgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Another chapter to the 6WD vs. Mecanum debate

I compiled this information on a thread a while ago....It's not entirely complete, but if it means anything to this conversation I have the drivetrains of the winning alliance members of the championships.

2010
67 – 8 WD
177 – 8 WD (articulated is sets of two, front and back)
294 – 6WD

2009
67 - 6WD wide
111 - 4 wheel crab (non-coaxial), wide
971 - 6WD wide

2008
1114 - 6WD long
217 - 6WD long
148 - three-wheeled crab (coaxial), nonagon-shaped robot

2007
177 - 6WD long
987 - 6WD long
190 - 6WD long

2006
217 - 6WD long
522 - Treads, long
296 - 2WD long, Omnis in front

2005
67 - three-wheeled crab (non-coaxial). Flop bot.
330 - 6WD long
503 – 4WD long, omniwheels in rear


2004
71 - 4WD long
494 - 4WD long
435 - 2WD long, with casters in front

2003
111 - Four-wheeled non-coaxial crab (with dropdown skid for turning)
469 – 4WD Long
65 - 4WD Wide

2002
71 - 4WD flop bot with casters in front
173 - 4WD long
66 – 4WD long

2001
71 - ?
294 - ?
125 - ?
365 - ?
279 - ?

2000
255 - ?
232 - ?
25 - ?

1999
176 - 4WD long w/ Omnis in front
1 - tank treads, long
48 – 4WD, long

1998
45 – 4WD long with Omnis in front.

1997
71 - ?

1996
73 - ?

1995
100 - ?

1994
144 - ?

1993
148 - ?

1992
126 - ?

Important to note that mecanum wheels have not been available to first teams for this entire time, but the numbers are stacked in favor of skid steers. From 04 to 05 the dimensions changed from 30x36 to the current size, 28x38, so there are fewer 6 wheel bots as you go back before 2005.

I've had people argue that the reason skid steers win more is baecause they are more common, but I prefer to view this as "the best teams win, and by no coinsidence, they are skid steer bots." So basically they are winning because they are good, not because they are greater in numbers. They are simple, intuitive to drive, and comparatively pretty light, which leaves weight for an affective manipulator.

Last edited by sgreco : 21-01-2011 at 18:37. Reason: False claims...
Reply With Quote
  #44   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2011, 18:43
IndySam's Avatar
IndySam IndySam is offline
Registered User
FRC #0829 (Digital Goats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Indy
Posts: 3,362
IndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Another chapter to the 6WD vs. Mecanum debate

We are building a mecanum drive. We feel it's best for our strategy.


BUT!!!!


We are also building into our drive the ability to quickly change to 6 wheel drop center. The holes are already cut into our frame. Add a nano box and a little chain and off we go.

Our first regional is week three, if we were week one I doubt we would attempt the mecanum setup. If we didn't have the ability or funds to build a second robot for practice and testing we wouldn't try mecanum.
__________________
"Champions are champions not because they do anything extraordinary but because they do the ordinary things better than anyone else." —Chuck Knoll


2015 Indianapolis District Winner
2014 Boilermaker Regional Industrial Design Award
2013 Smoky Mountain Regional Industrial Design Award
2012 Boilermaker Engineering Excellence Award
2010 Boilermaker Rockwell Innovation in Control Award.
2009 Buckeye J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2009 Boilermaker J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2008 Boilermaker J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2007 St Louis Regional Winners
Reply With Quote
  #45   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2011, 21:03
klmx30302's Avatar
klmx30302 klmx30302 is offline
Is ready for MAYHEM In Merrimack!
AKA: Kevin McCarthy
FRC #0166 (Chop Shop)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Merrimack,NH
Posts: 221
klmx30302 is a jewel in the roughklmx30302 is a jewel in the roughklmx30302 is a jewel in the rough
Re: Another chapter to the 6WD vs. Mecanum debate

Our team decided on mecanum drive day 2 of build season, we had resurrected our 2007 chassis into a driving mecanum proto-chassis by the end of week one. We have 1/2 our chassis done now (waiting on more brackets from 80/20) and because we are making most of our robot from 80/20 we will probably make a practice chassis. I think that because 2007 was the introduction of andymark mecanum wheels that it seems they havnt had a decent chance to prove them selves since then, this seems to be that year.
__________________
Unofficial Team 166 Videographer
Our team motto...
"THINK!, There must be a harder way!"


Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:13.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi