|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: It the mini bot end game worth to many points | |||
| yes |
|
63 | 48.46% |
| no |
|
25 | 19.23% |
| just right |
|
42 | 32.31% |
| Voters: 130. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mini bot worth to many points
[Rant]
In some games 3 average robots can beat 2 good robots. This is not one of those games. I predict that nearly every compition will be won by the first seed alliance. Why: From a tube scoring point of view: Three robots would be a good stratigy if corrdinated properly. However, sending the weakest robot to play defense (sideways between towers) will cause enough problems that the 2 good robots can out preform the 3 average. From a mini-bot point of view: There is only two towers. The 2 good robots will presumably have faster mini-bots then any of the 3 average robots every time. It is because of this that the 3 average robots will not be able to make a comeback with the mini-bots. [/Rant] Soooo, yes I do think the mini-bots would be better off as: 1st- 25 points 2nd- 20 3rd- 15 4th- 10 Possible match results: A: 1st; 2nd +45 alliance B: 3rd; 4th +25 A: 1st; 3rd +40 B: 2nd; 4th +30 A: 1st; 4th +35 B: 2nd; 3rd +35 If alliance A gets 1st and 4th then they are now tied (plus 35 to both). this would make the mini-bots still very relevant. However, the game would be won or lost with the tubes. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|