|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team 1625 Minibot FIRST Run
I would, assuming the weight of 2 motors, a battery, and some small bits of aluminum, physics and theory say its going to take at least 2 seconds. this seems to be breaking the laws of physics. I will make a assumption, that there is no battery on board in this video.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team 1625 Minibot FIRST Run
Quote:
Winnovation rejects your reality and substitutes its own. ![]() |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team 1625 Minibot FIRST Run
Haha. Both added to the CD spotlight!
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team 1625 Minibot FIRST Run
DANG!!! That guy in the gray IRI shirt sure is good looking!
![]() |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team 1625 Minibot FIRST Run
Quote:
![]() |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team 1625 Minibot FIRST Run
You would be correct... lol
![]() |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team 1625 Minibot FIRST Run
I'm seriously going to worry the next two weeks about this one. Anyways, awesome minibot guys. Can't wait to really see it when you guys actually unveil everything.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team 1625 Minibot FIRST Run
it looks like its got 1 motor drive, and no battery attached. it makes sense... Try adding the battery mass and an extra motor because 1 isn't going to cut it once the battery attached.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team 1625 Minibot FIRST Run
I would quite happily take my 3 second MINIBOT into a Finals match against 1625. There's entirely too much that happens (including some luck) to think that a 2-second MINIBOT is the end of the world. Stop braining your walls (or w/e), calling it cheating, or disseminating what that cord is that looks attached to it. The reality is, it doesn't matter. It's a score differential to make up via strategy, and so long as 4 MINIBOTS climb it's QUITE doable.
Last edited by JesseK : 31-01-2011 at 13:54. Reason: comma, comma comma, comma -- English 1101 will haunt me forever |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team 1625 Minibot FIRST Run
That is great to see it go up that fast but with that design i see know easy way of deploying it to the bar
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team 1625 Minibot FIRST Run
Why downplay the benefit of a faster minibot?
The time of the entire process, deployment and climb, is what matters. Just because deployment is in there, doesn't mean climb time doesn't count. A 1.5 second climb will be a huge advantage. Assuming they have similar deployment speeds, they can deploy later and still win. Assuming they have faster deployment speeds, which they likely will, they can deploy much later and still win. If you disagree, then settle for 3 seconds. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team 1625 Minibot FIRST Run
It's less a matter of 'settling' for 3 seconds and more a matter of our practical inability to attain 2 seconds within the tooling capability and scheduling we have this season. So for us, it's a [time]cost-benefit analysis.
The point was for those who covet the capabilities to quit whining. Last edited by JesseK : 31-01-2011 at 16:13. Reason: was a bit brash... |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team 1625 Minibot FIRST Run
I think the fastest minibots will be some of the simplest minibots. I don't think you need to have a whole lot of tooling capability to make the minibot in the video.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team 1625 Minibot FIRST Run
Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|