Go to Post Take it from a team that mastered tank treads and still hasn't built them in over a decade - it's not worth it. - Isaac501 [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Motors
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #44   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2011, 20:00
NyCityKId's Avatar
NyCityKId NyCityKId is offline
That Weird Kid
AKA: Andre Dunkley
FRC #1601 (Quantum Samurai)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Queens, New York
Posts: 137
NyCityKId is a splendid one to beholdNyCityKId is a splendid one to beholdNyCityKId is a splendid one to beholdNyCityKId is a splendid one to beholdNyCityKId is a splendid one to beholdNyCityKId is a splendid one to beholdNyCityKId is a splendid one to beholdNyCityKId is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to NyCityKId
Re: usage of denso window motor

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRysenga View Post
We have been debating the same question... Can we use the worm gear transmission only? If you remove everything related to the motor (armature, brushes, wires, etc.) you are left with a nice input shaft to drive the worm gears. Why couldn't we use another (un modified) motor to drive this transmissioin? R47 talks about "modifying" motors. We demolished the denso motor and threw it away! R47 also states, "The intent of this rule is to maintain the maximum power level for each ROBOT" We didn't change the maximum power level since we plan to use another (legal) motor from the kit to drive the worm gears. Think we would pass inspection?
To the best of my knowledge and understanding of the rules taking apart a gear box or transmission should be perfectly OK as long as rules <R47> and the rules on COTS items are followed. They don't have any specific rules governing gearboxes and they're uses. And there is also this: This intent is clearly met when a team obtains a MECHANISM or COTS items that was designed for non-FIRST purposes, and then modifies or alters it to provide functionality for the ROBOT. For example, if a team obtains a gearbox from a power drill and modifies it to use on the ROBOT, they gain insight into the design of the original gearbox purpose, learn to characterize the performance of the original design, and implement the engineering design process to create their customized application for the gearbox. According to that excerpt, taking apart a gearbox and using it in an innovative way is perfectly acceptable. This, however, is only speculation. If you want a final answer you should post this question to the official Q&A and see what the GDC has to say.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi