|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: toughest regional in 2011?
Under that logic wouldn't Waterloo be the harder event to win?
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: toughest regional in 2011?
Quote:
In Waterloo, the way to win is to be above them in seeding, or to be better than one of them to the other one, who is hopefully higher in the standings. Not so terribly difficult, now, is it? ![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: toughest regional in 2011?
Hardest Event to win.. MSC... 64 top teams.. yes its all michigan teams.. yes you have to quailify, but still to win it, its tough... Good teams are left out of elims every year...
Hardest Regional to win Midwest.. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: toughest regional in 2011?
TECHNICALLY MSC is a regional. It just sends way more teams to the CMP than any other.
Anyway, it's the only regional for which it takes more than fingers and toes to count all the really good teams. How was 2834 the final pick in eliminations last year? First and 2nd overall picks at ATL divisions were ranked 8th and 9th at MSC (respectively). Multiple other proofs here. Besides, MSC (and districts, a few of which are loaded as well), I'd have to agree that Midwest is again very strong. San Diego is powerful as well. Those are two regionals I'll have to watch. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|