Go to Post Greetings FIRST: THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU. - Tetraman [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Electrical > CAN
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-01-2011, 15:45
techhelpbb's Avatar
techhelpbb techhelpbb is offline
Registered User
FRC #0011 (MORT - Team 11)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,624
techhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Jaguar Speed Control Only Reaches 50% of Setpoint

Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinSchuh View Post
I'm going to take the position that if someone is using just a P controller to try to get the robot to drive at a velocity, they are doing it wrong. They should first start with the I term, and leave the rest of them 0. Would you every try just using the D term in a PID loop when trying to go to position? You'd say that the person was doing it wrong if they did that.
Not really stating that the P loop alone should drive the robot. Merely looking for an optimal tuning procedure based on the Jaguar's implementation of PID.

If you read the available information, without wandering into this topic, I suspect you'd try tuning the P loop alone first as a student as well (I can prove that easily because that's exactly what 2 students on our team did independently after trying to work out the presented information within the limits of their math skills).

Hence the reason I seek clarification and the others seek to compare notes. I recognize you feel that this is burdensome math to some extent, but the issue is not whether or not I understand it (or believe you as you put it), it's how anyone expects teams to tune these PID loops with the available information unless they have someone much more familiar with the subject to refer to. To put it bluntly, show me where the section with suggestions on tuning the parameters for the Jaguar PID loop is in their documentation.

I'll confirm with the students tonight, but I'm fairly sure they didn't use a P gain higher than 7 before instability occurred.
I'm pretty sure that we didn't have 50% error at that point. I could be wrong, but we'll surely find out.

UPDATED: They were never able to exceed 6 with one or 6.3 with another for the P gain before instability. Around those values the error was 10%-15% for us.

Of course the point of this discussion about the Jaguars and how they work was to wring out issues like this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinSchuh View Post
Assuming velocity is measured in meters/sec, and the jaguar takes volts as it's input, which is probably not the case for the supplied control loop.
Obviously the discussion itself hinges on finer details like you wrote above. As tuning into the marginal is effected by the actual feedback and the inconsistencies that it may create.

Last edited by techhelpbb : 31-01-2011 at 17:29.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:11.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi