|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: C++ vs Java
There is quite a bit of discussion on this topic already in the forums. So next time search before posting.
We use JAVA because: 1. students learn Java in AP courses 2. garbage collection & great error handling! 3. Netbeans is a friendly IDE for first time coders If you want more JAVA sample code , take a look at our code base from 2010 or if your brave, our 2011 development code. http://code.google.com/p/discobots/downloads/list |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: C++ vs Java
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Thank you to everyone for responding. I've decided not to make things more complicated than they need to be and use Java. Good luck to everyone and see some of you at the competition. (: |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: C++ vs Java
For FRC-specific purposes it does not matter whether you use Java or C++, but I would recommend C++ as it will help you develop a knowledge of programming that applies to a larger variety of languages.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: C++ vs Java
I recommend C++. The libraries are more mature by a year and the syntax is similiar enough to java that you will pick it up in no time. Post any questions and I'm sure somebody will help.
Brian |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: C++ vs Java
Main reasons why I chose Java:
1.) Simplicity 2.) I am the only one that knows C++ 3.) NetBeans is Open Source (Why do I care? Because I run Linux, so I can code on my machine at home) 4.) AP Comp Sci teaches Java Cons: 1.) No inline Assembly 2.) No pointers 3.) Too high level for my liking |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: C++ vs Java
Can you show me some FRC code you have written where it was necessary to inline assembly?
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: C++ vs Java
Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|