|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Minibot
why would you need sensors other than maybe a touch? as soon as it hits the pole, it should go up autonomously, no?
|
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Minibot
See the gossary for ROBOT... ROBOT = HOSTBOT + MINIBOT.
|
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Minibot
I think I found the rule that would prevent a spring-loaded minibot. I may be interpreting it wrong though. If the list of parts allowed for the minibot says "C. exactly one 12V rechargeable NiMH battery pack identical to those supplied in the FTC kit of parts (PN W739057)" that is exactly one, not up to one. So having a battery on board would defeat the purpose of having a spring-loaded minibot. Just saying.
|
|
#49
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Minibot
Quote:
I do read the Minobot rule C as "Exactly one" - not zero, not two or more, so I must have that battery as part of the robot. I just have not yet found any rule that requires me to draw any energy from that battery. |
|
#50
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Minibot
OK, that being said:
Quote:
This may be controversial, but if I launch a minibot mechanically (e.g. with a spring), is that "uncontrolled motion that cannot be stopped by the drivers"? If so, it is "unsafe" and not allowed. (Yes, I know that even the 'conventional' minibots shown at kickoff couldn't be stopped either). |
|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Minibot
Quote:
|
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Minibot
I didn't mean that you couldn't make a spring-loaded minibot, I was merely remarking upon the paradox of adding dead weight to something that needs to climb (or launch and reach a specific altitude and hit a target with a specific force) fast.
|
|
#53
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Minibot
You can also read that rule as you are permitted to have exactly one battery, or, If we use a battery it must be exactly one of this type.
For the record, there are mechanically autonomous things. For example, certain types of clocks, mousetrap cars, Rube Goldberg machines (in general). I would suggest that any Minibot attached to the pole is not undergoing uncontrolled motion, unless it's going from top to bottom and back again at extremely high speed. The motion is perfectly constrained and all you need is something to stop it. |
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Minibot
Quote:
also the host bot itself may not deploy the minibot |
|
#55
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Minibot
What?I'm not sure what you mean by this, but it suddenly has me very worried that I have missed something rather important! |
|
#56
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Minibot
Does the entire minibot have to climb the pole or can like half go up and the other half stay at the bottom?
NVM, cant grow bigger than the size limit. Last edited by dodar : 27-01-2011 at 20:05. |
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Minibot
You CAN have more than one minibot. obviously not on the bot at a time but you can have more than one. It is also to allow teams to lend them to other team for coopertition points.
|
|
#58
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Minibot
We were thinking the same thing but we found a rule stating that the minibot must have 1 motor we think it means it must use a motor to get up to the top of the tower
![]() |
|
#59
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Minibot
Quote:
However, climbing the pole legally without at least one of the Tetrix motors is impossible under <G19>. You are allowed 2 Tetrix motors, and no more, on a minibot. |
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Minibot
Here is a short video of our minibot and we would love some positive feedback from anyone that can offer it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZvXsaTXGfI
Thank you from team 2883 F.R.E.D |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|