|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Legality of older spikes
Team#2057-Vegas, you are mistaken. Whether or not something was in "old kit" has no bearing whatsoever on its legality now.
|
|
#2
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Legality of older spikes
It can... If an item is no longer available, it would normally be illegal <R28>. However, if that item was custom made for FIRST from a previous KOP, it would be legal <R30>. Or if it was in a previous KOP and on an old robot, it would be legal <R29>.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Legality of older spikes
There is not a distinction between the old style Spike and the newer style Spike except as described above. Likewise there is no real difference between the Red Label and Blue Label Victor 884. (There was some confusion during the transition of the labels.) However, if one reads through the manual you will find no mention of a requirement to use only Victor 884 or jaguar speed controllers this year. The rules have been relaxed for the use of any controller as long as the command is generated within the cRIO where it can be controlled by FMS.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Legality of older spikes
Doesn't <R48> come into play here?
Quote:
I would highly recommend following the blue box instructions to get this old style Spike approved as a power regulating device for this year before basing your design on it. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Legality of older spikes
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Legality of older spikes
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Legality of older spikes
I'd suggest you ask on FIRSTs Q&A forum.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Legality of older spikes
I will do that.
WAIT- I am using them for a LIGHT. team update #8 allows using spikes OR any other relay for Lights. does that mean that for my intentended use, this thread is a moot point? Last edited by ratdude747 : 05-02-2011 at 09:50. |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Legality of older spikes
In response to TU #6, I am not so sure. Please standby.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Legality of older spikes
re-reading the update, i see that it refers back to the relays allowed, being spikes.
IIRC, the only difference between the old blues and new spikes is the plastic. they seem to have the same "guts" |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Legality of older spikes
Quote:
Quote:
I know as an inspector this year, If i saw Spikes that didn't look like the spikes I've used on robots over the past few years, I would raise some big questions. You don't want to be put in that position, so please get a reading from the GDC or contact the frcparts e-mail to get the older spikes approved. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Legality of older spikes
i emailed frcparts yesterday.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Legality of older spikes
Quote:
So, in your opinion, the red label 884s are OK? We have a gaggle of motors on this years bot and are looking to save $$$ by scrounging our older bots. TIA |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Legality of older spikes
Keith the answer is yes, there is no difference between label colors. See my post in the other thread for greater detail.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|