|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Using Windriver to compile a normal program?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Using Windriver to compile a normal program?
Aw, it kind of sucks that Windriver isn't multipurpose, but then again, that's not really what it was designed for, I suppose.
Thanks for the suggestions - I'll try them out. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Using Windriver to compile a normal program?
Quote:
I prefer a Linux development environment, so an alternative option might be running a VM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Using Windriver to compile a normal program?
Quote:
![]() |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Using Windriver to compile a normal program?
Vimmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. <geeks-out>
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Using Windriver to compile a normal program?
Vim?
Said in my best Homer Simpson "donut" impression: emacs <ahhhhhhhh> Let the flame wares begin. ![]() |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Using Windriver to compile a normal program?
Somebody needs to close this thread right now.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Using Windriver to compile a normal program?
OP: You can if you mess around with the makefile
mandrews281 and basicxman: Why use those when you have nano, gedit, and the butterfly? |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Using Windriver to compile a normal program?
You're kidding right? D:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|