|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Victor Syncing
Sure, you can even buy those Y cables. Of course the motors and transmissions themselves may run at slightly different speeds to don't expect that to solve all of your problems. It does make life slightly easier for the programmers, though.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Victor Syncing
I have a couple of them, but what else can i do to get the motors as close as posible to synced?
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Victor Syncing
What we do is measure the speed of each wheel with a tachometer and then adjust the relative speed in software. If you don't have a tach, you could just use the good old fashion guess-and-try method.
All this assumes you've broken in your transmissions and reduced friction in the drive train as much as you can. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Victor Syncing
The most common use is to stick two CIM's into a toughbox or CIMple box and run them with two separate victors or jaguars, which are then signaled through a Y cable. While Dale is right in that it won't solve all the problems, it's good enough. The CIM's will run close to the same speed, although it's almost guaranteed that one will want to go slightly faster than the other if you just had it free spinning. In that case, the slower motor would act as a drag on the faster motor... but the speeds are so close you wouldn't notice anything. Under load (aka when attached to wheels and driving around), the actual work being done by the motors is going to be a larger drag than any small difference between the motors, and you'll end up seeing them operate at the same speed, but overall providing about double the torque when compared to running a single motor.
So, if your using the same motors, running in the same direction, you won't see any real difference, and the difference that is there is typically negligible. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Victor Syncing
Sorry, I didn't mention it before but this is not for the drive it is for an elbow like joint driven by two window motors on two victors with no gearbox.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Victor Syncing
Make sure you calibrate the two Victors using a "Y" cable. That way, they will also be calibrated to the exact same signal. This "should" get the two motors very close in performance.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Victor Syncing
How do I calibrate the victors?
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Victor Syncing
Page #2 has the details.
Quote:
Last edited by billbo911 : 09-02-2011 at 16:53. Reason: Copied instructions into the post. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Victor Syncing
We used two window motors last year to power a cam for our kicker. Essentially, the motors were sandwiched together with the cam in the middle. We powered ours from two spikes, but never had a problem with any speed differential between the two window motors.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Victor Syncing
Yeah, what im worried about is the variable speed of the victors because window motors usually only go forward stop reverse and im worried about them changing at different rates and twisting the mount
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|