|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ADXL345 I2C Accelerometer NOT WORKING
Well, we ended up getting it to work in SPI mode (we did have to shorten the loop time from 100ms to 10ms). So we'll just live with that unless we run out of DIO ports. Thanks!
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ADXL345 I2C Accelerometer NOT WORKING
I have been trying to hook up my accelerometer and have had similar problems. I am writing in Java and have tried using the ADXL345_I2C class to interface with the accelerometer, but to no end. Every time I try to get the acceleration all I get back is 0, no matter how much I shake it.
I have also tried using I2C directly and still got nothing. I would like to try SPI, but I don't know how I would get the data back in the code, the DigitalInput class only returns boolean values, not doubles. If someone could tell me how to use SPI in Java or what I'm doing wrong with the I2C I would really appreciate it!!! Thanks. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Joe |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ADXL345 I2C Accelerometer NOT WORKING
(Bump on an old thread and hope someone sees it!)
Hello all, I am having the same problem. We are using Java. Can someone post the wiring diagram from LabView or a screenshot of it? I can not find one though I looked. I did put a scope on the clock and data and they show traffic, but I don't have a protocol analyzer to tell if the traffic is correct. Also can anyone who has it working confirm if we need to put out own pullup resistor on the CS pin to get into i2c mode? It doesn't look like it, but it could just be the cRIO telling the senor to wake up over and over again. The code seems so simple I can't imagine it is the code, but if anyone knows any non-obvious points, that would also be appreciated. Thank you in advance! Bob PS My first CD post! |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ADXL345 I2C Accelerometer NOT WORKING
We have it working. We did nothing but solder the pins to the board and wire the 4wires to the digital sidecar. The LabVIEW example shows how.
Joe |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: ADXL345 I2C Accelerometer NOT WORKING
We are having the same issue.
Tried multiple DB-37 cables - round, ribbon, several different connectors, etc. Tried multiple 4-pin I2C cables. Tried 2 different ADXL345 board. Tried both a 4-slot and 8-slot cRIO. Checked that the pull-up resistors in the DSC are working - we see about 3k between 5V and SDA, 5V and SCL. SDA and SCL see about 4.6V. We don't have a scope to check waveforms unfortunately. We are programming in Java, and all we get back are 0.0 for all three axes. There are no errors thrown. I would love to get this working, but we opted to use a 2nd analog gyro turned sideways instead. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ADXL345 I2C Accelerometer NOT WORKING
Hello all,
I am beginning to wonder if the issue is the specific combination we are using. Does anyone out there have it running with this combination: * Java * 8 slot cRIO So far I have seen LabView and 4 slot examples running, but nothing confirmed with Java and 8 Slot. I wonder if there is a bug somewhere in the library support? Does anyone have _any_ i2c devices working with that combination? Thanks again! Bob |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yet another case of ADXL345 I2C Accelerometer NOT WORKING
We ARE using LabVIEW and tried both SPI and I2C examples, having updated the example from Sourceforge as mentioned in another thread. We rang out several round cables (checked good), but don't have a flat cable (it was damaged during repair). (I can't see why that should make a difference). We don't have a scope available.
There seem to be teams for which it works, and teams for which it doesn't. Again, we ARE using LabVIEW and are fully updated. The example gets into the Read VI and appears to stay there waiting for a response. I have no way of knowing whether the accelerometer didn't receive the previous write or it just isn't sending a value to be read. Can ANYONE help??? National Instruments??? |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Yet another case of ADXL345 I2C Accelerometer NOT WORKING
If you are stuck in read, that usually means that one of the I2C lines are stuck low. Make sure there are no shorts on your sensor.
Joe |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ADXL345 I2C Accelerometer NOT WORKING
We tried more than one.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ADXL345 I2C Accelerometer NOT WORKING
Another way this can happen is if the sensor is not powered. Are all the power supply LEDs lit on the digital sidecar?
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Solved - Re: ADXL345 I2C Accelerometer NOT WORKING
Hello all,
I found it - it was multiple faulty cables to the sidecar. The only one that works is a new flat cable from this year that I repaired according to the instructions on the KoP site. It looks like I probably had two problems at the beginning and after I fixed the other one, had the faulty cable issue. Once I got it running, it has been stable. I will post some photos is anyone is interested in seeing some documentation of an end to end system including some scope shots of traffic. I guess the "bad" cables must be good enough for the low order PWMs and other channels we were using to fool me. So the moral of the story, even if you are sure your round cable is good, ONLY use a new flat cable without a twist until you get it working. Then switch other items one at a time so if it stops working you know what it was that went wrong. Thanks to all who replied! Bob |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: ADXL345 I2C Accelerometer NOT WORKING
I've experienced quite a variety of issues, but let me share what I have done to get it finally working to some degree. This is using the Labview example with I2C interface only.
1) Make sure the cable you use to connect from the CRIO to Digital Side Car is correctly pinned and in proper working order. a) We found our round molded ones from previous years to be faulty as others have described here. b) We tried the ribbon cable from last season (from Andymark irrc) which also did not work for us. c) We repaired this years ribbon cable, which does work. 2) Make sure your connections to the accelerometer as well as to the digital side car are clean and good. It appears from my testing the I2C is very very sensitive to poorly made cables and it will have a large impact on it's ability to communicate. 3) When using the example I2C, I found I had better success when I ran the driver station application on the same laptop as the example. I noticed in the example code an open/close for the driver station so I started running it. 4) Even with all of the above, sometimes it works, sometimes it fails to respond, sometimes it works for a while, then fails. All the failures are a failure to respond. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|