|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defective Black Jaguars?
From the information you've provided, it sounds like the Jaguars in suspect work, but just don't support CAN.
Are ALL your black Jaguars like this? Could you update their firmware again, and see if that changes anything? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Defective Black Jaguars?
We had an issue like that on 2 different black jags. We just flashed the firmware again and they worked fine
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defective Black Jaguars?
I know this is old, but I want to post my (odd) results.
When we re-flashed them, they worked fine, and I forgot about this for a while, until I flashed one again, and it did not work. After some testing I discovered this pattern: Flash -> works Re-Flash -> does not work Re-Flash -> works Re-Flash -> does not work Re-Flash -> works Re-Flash -> does not work Re-Flash -> works Re-Flash -> does not work etc... |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defective Black Jaguars?
It appears that re-flashing a working Jaguar will fail, causing that Jaguar to not work. Maybe something to do with the bootloader.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defective Black Jaguars?
If this pattern is the case for all jaguars, I would think that the manufacturer would want to know about this since it seems like a resolvable issue (even if the solution is just to release a notice to users about the existence of this phenomenon).
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|