|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: SPAM's 2011 LogoMotion Robot
no swerve?
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: SPAM's 2011 LogoMotion Robot
I love the wiring on your arm! Very professional and ingenious running it through the center as opposed to latching it to the sides.
Do you have any problems with the corrugated tubing at the top when your arm is fully extended? It seems like the tubing wouldn't like to be bent that much. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: SPAM's 2011 LogoMotion Robot
Familiar...yep! This is the third year we decided to use a 2-link arm. We really debated the pro's and con's of a 2-link vs. a single pivot with telescope vs. a lift. In the end we chose to go with what we already had experience with.
We made a decision in week 1, that a 6wd would work better for us in transiting the field, as we expect some pushing contests in the middle. This 'bot is so responsive, that we have not had alignment issues when hanging tubes. While I have liked the holonomic and swerve chassis's we've built, 6wd has won me over. We avoid wrapping the tubing, by raising the shoulder counter-clockwise ( in this view), when we reach for the top pegs. For the middle peg we raise it clockwise, but not much above 45deg. So far the tubing has not shown signs of fatigue. Eric Last edited by EricS-Team180 : 25-02-2011 at 08:52. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|