|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
Our team was considing picking 3536 as one of our partners, but us dropping down to 7th seed then up to 5th seed didnt allow that seeing as u guys were second. I was very impressed by what you guys did and have seen that you guys stayed with what you guys had said at the one strategy meeting that i cant seem to remember where it was held
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
Thanks Brian,
302 was on our list as well, picking was a huge stress for us. We are going to Waterford and scout to practice the scouting picking cycle. As rookies we watched matches closely for matching play strategy. But the end game of alliance picking was serious chess play that we want to practice. We want to learn and be better prepared for alliance if we are fortunate to be anywhere close to that again. We hope 302 would still consider us if it ever comes up again. We look forward to the next time we meet either together or against. By the way 3536 saw you at Baker College Strategy meeting. Thanks for acknowledging what we said at Baker. Not everyone there agreed with our strategy if you remember. It was hard to hear some of the comments that challenged it. We went back and scrubbed the game play to rationalize the criticism. It was hard but we decided to stick with what we said were going to do. We feel stongly that we are a team that stands by our words. Last edited by Coach#3536 : 09-03-2011 at 02:02. Reason: changing to condense |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
If that strategy was to focus on a consistent minibot rather than a manipulator, I would say you were rather justified. 2nd Alliance Captain as a rookie is not too bad at all
. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
Thanks Norman.
The Bees are pretty incredible. To hear from your team on our behalf is an honor! We really respect what you guys do!! Those bots you brought are true cool no doubt. Tell Jim "the Ninja" we took his advice and have a kid are tossing tubes everyday now. We will be ready if we get another chance to play the role with you guys again. Yes we said strong agile Defensive bot with a Minibot. Having a good time playing the role. Good luck next round to all on the bees. |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
My apologies, updates for Kettering were extremely sporadic, with the final qualification results not even posted until after the competition was over. I mainly made sure teams were listed on the right alliances but highly doubted 27 was actually a 3rd round pick.
|
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
It looks like FIM's website now has posted its own list of alliance picks for Kettering and TC. From my cursory glance, it seems to line up with what's been posted here already.
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
Florida
1. 179, 233, 108 2. 386, 341, 3376 3. 1649, 1065, 79 4. 103, 86, 945 5. 801, 1592, 744 6. 3149, 1902, 180 7. 1027, 1557, 2425 8. 1523, 1251, 21 *801 declined 1649 |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
Pittsburgh
1) 1114, 1503, 3492 2) 1507, 48, 1541 3) 772, 63, 2252 4) 2614, 1038, 3193 5) 337, 291, 3504 6) 1319, 3138, 1629 7) 378, 128, 3511 8) 3260, 1533, 2603 I didn't catch if there were any declines... |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
WPI
358, 190, 2437 (*177 and 40 both declined a first round draft request) 177, 3125, 1100 3280, 236, 2168 40, 195, 2370 121, 230, 3044 228, 2067, 839 1772, 1884, 3205 571, 1735, 2648 |
|
#25
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
No one got Duluth? They drafted 15+ min ago I think
KC 1. 525 1730 1984 2. 967 1985 2996 3. 476 935 1806 4. 1986 1982 2373 5. 1810 1710 3528 6. 1939 3284 1825 7. 2874 662 932 8. 2410 2345 1098 Last edited by The Lucas : 12-03-2011 at 13:19. |
|
#26
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
Waterford:
1) 573 - 3098 - 3770 SF 2) 2612 - 2834 - 3414 F 3) 1596 - 2246 - 3604 SF 4) 3707 - 3542 - 3401 QF 5) 3539 - 548 - 3620 W 6) 3234 - 3638 - 862 QF 7) 3771 - 3547 - 68 QF 8) 3538 - 226 - 2851 QF No declines Last edited by Basel A : 12-03-2011 at 20:29. Reason: Updated |
|
#27
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
Wisconsin
111, 2826, 2702 2202, 1732, 537 1625, 234, 93 2062, 1714, 930 269, 868, 171 135, 2481, 2041 1716, 3362, 2022 2077, 706, 1675 |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
Lake Superior - Duluth
1 876 2512 3747 2 2169 2530 3275 3 877 2518 3840 4 1816 2418 2052 5 2177 2538 2500 6 2574 2503 3294 7 3054 3297 3839 8 3056 2227 2499 1-4 went to semis 1-2 in finals #1 wins in 3 matches, 4 if you count second match which was replayed due to field scoring problems 2169 won chairmans third yr in a row |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
BTW, the Peachtree regional is held in Duluth, Georgia. Food for thought when referring to either Peachtree or Lake Superior.
|
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
I was confused when Brian referred to Duluth before and I was thinking Georgia wasn't this week.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|