|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: In your opinion, what claw design has been the most successful? | |||
| Roller Claw |
|
76 | 75.25% |
| Grabber Claw |
|
15 | 14.85% |
| Tube-inside Claw |
|
3 | 2.97% |
| Entire tube manipulator |
|
3 | 2.97% |
| Other |
|
4 | 3.96% |
| Voters: 101. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Most successful claw design?
Our team has a pnumatic grabber, with the addition of an automated grabbing mode. So theoretically we would have the ease of use of a roller claw with the ease of placing of a normal grabber.
However, this is theoretical, and we all know the difference between theory and practice. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|