|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Bumper Inspection Discrepency
Quote:
However, if the Lead Robot Inspector at the Peachtree Regional found something that was specifically not allowed in the rules (possibly a different rule), then their decision at that time must be followed, like your team did. If there is indeed a specific rule that we did not catch at the Alamo Regional, and we should have told you about this, then I am sorry that this was missed. Reading through this thread, I still don't see a clear explanation of why your bumpers would be illegal. If anyone can clearly and effectively show how this is illegal, please do this so we can all be educated. If you (or anyone) wish to pass along more information to me via PM, I can possibly help alleviate this situation. Sincerely, Andy Baker LRI at Alamo Regional & Boilermaker Regional Inspector at Midwest Regional & Smokey Mountain Regional Last edited by Andy Baker : 22-03-2011 at 08:23. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Bumper Inspection Discrepency
Guys,
I am guessing the answer came from this rule... D. BUMPERS segments must have a minimum length of six inches (as defined by the BUMPER backing), and a maximum length that does not exceed the maximum horizontal dimension of the ROBOT (except for the soft cushion in the corner, as permitted by Rule <R07-C>). We have allowed teams to make one piece bumpers that do not violate any other rules. Paul's design is but one that appears to be legal. Please remember that the 1" hard parts rules is a cross sectional rule as defined in Fig 4-1 extending out from the robot frame. As always, inspectors are concerned that no hard parts exist in the corners that can damage another robot. Sorry that you got passed at one regional and caught at another. We are trying hard to make things consistent across all regionals. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|