|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 4 OPR
Ed,
did you include Hawaii? I dont see it when I type in our team #. -Glenn |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 4 OPR
Quote:
The most notable thing about your team is in qualifying matches, someone on your alliance got 1st place in every race. With regards to the regionals I have full data on, you are the only team who has achieved this. By pairing up with 368 you created a minibot monopoly. This is another example where picking the best robot may not be the best pick. It looks like 2439 had an great robot, but a less valuable minibot. They picked 1056 who had the most valuable robot, and a decent minibot. However after looking at 359 and 368's EMCs the only way to beat them would be to compete against them in the race. It would have been a gamle, but it looks like 2439 should have considered 2090, who looks like the only team with a minibot who could really go toe to toe with 359 and 368s. Here is just another example where minibot monopolies win... Congrats guys on the great job! Last edited by mwtidd : 29-03-2011 at 07:27. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Week 4 OPR
Quote:
Thanks for catching the mistake. It has been updated in version 5. http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/2174 I think what happened was when I first tried to get the data for all Week 4 events, your regional was not done yet due to time difference. I later went back to get the data, ran the True World Ranking macros and published the results and forgot to run the macros for the regional itself. So the True World Ranking was valid and did not change. The only difference in version 5 is that it includes the Hawaii regional results for the Query, CCWM results and OPR results tab. Sorry about the error. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|