Go to Post Thank you lord I knew there was a reason I got 10 books on autonomous robotics. - Adam Y. [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-04-2011, 00:51
Aren Siekmeier's Avatar
Aren Siekmeier Aren Siekmeier is offline
on walkabout
FRC #2175 (The Fighting Calculators)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: 대한민국
Posts: 735
Aren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond reputeAren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond reputeAren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond reputeAren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond reputeAren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond reputeAren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond reputeAren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond reputeAren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond reputeAren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond reputeAren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond reputeAren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 30 lbs allowance

At North Star they have been sticklers about weighing withholding allowances if they have any reason to believe its over (perhaps because of the number of posts here in the first day of the thread). One thing that really bit a lot of us is bumpers. We somehow totally overlooked that they weren't except from the 30 lbs (R33), so we didn't bag them with the robot. Several teams were rebuilding some if not all of their bumpers today.

Now don't get me wrong, I think it's very important that we all stay within the rules on this one. It is, after all, a rule. However, I am very strongly of the opinion that it needs to change. It seems to me that not exempting the bumpers severely penalizes teams going to bag and tag events. Unless they can fit them in their withholding allowance (unlikely, with 2 sets weighing 20-30 lbs), they must bag them, which is really not very convenient. You can only put one set on the robot at a time, which still complicates getting the bagged robot through doorways, and the loose bumpers need to be secured.

And it just makes sense that they shouldn't be included in the withholding allowance. They are not included in robot weight, and are an incredibly standard item by definition, let alone a required one. And they are hardly a functional part of a robot. What edge is attained by completing these after ship day (which we didn't do, but obviously that's what the rule is after).

I'm probably just feeling this way because we had to rebuild two of ours and witnessed first hand a team spending a good chunk of the day rebuilding most of theirs. Of course, this is because of a rules oversight by us, not because of the rule itself.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:46.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi