Go to Post If I had come up with a chokehold strategy, I wouldn't talk about it on Chief Delphi. - Tom Bottiglieri [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2011, 11:12
Koko Ed's Avatar
Koko Ed Koko Ed is offline
Serial Volunteer
AKA: Ed Patterson
FRC #0191 (X-Cats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Rochester,NY
Posts: 22,954
Koko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Is alliance selection usually this bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by IKE View Post
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/2370
Here is a thread I started a year or so ago about scouting methods. One thing it does not cover in great details is "The Pick List". I will post up a template that we use. Every team Friday should make a list of at the very minimum 1-23 (24 if you include yourself). Teams that you would be interested in having as a partner. With detailed scouting, this usually still requires an hour of debate mostly trying to flesh out the slots for 12-24. This is the most difficult area as this area typically has the smallest differentiators between teams.
On our team, we also include a bubble section of around 4 teams, and a DNP section (Do Not Pick). DNPs usually result from gathering an abundance of general penalties, DQ potential penalties, and/or often not functioning or broken. Here in Michigan, this list is usually quite long at the first event, and much smaller at the second as teams get their controls sorted out, and most teams learn the rule better.
Saturday morning, we do a walk through on the bubble teams to see how they are doing, and discuss any issues we may have noticed on Friday. If there are specific behaviours we would like to see from a team (tube herding or defense), we will talk to them about their schedule and ask them to exhibit this behaviour in a match of their choosing. Some will agree to this, some will turn us down. We then refine the list right up until the end. Make a duplicate, and send it out. The duplicate is then used to discuss selections with you partner. Typically off to the side.

********************
Even knowing all this things, we are still often caught of guard for the alliance selection process.

Part of the selection issue is that with the WLT system, ranking tend to fluctuate a lot right up until the very end. This makes it very difficult to discuss strategies with potential alliance partners. Also, because team captains are called to the field immediately after the last match, there is very little time to adjust lists relative to rankings.
I would love for teams to be given a 10-15 minute break after the first round to discuss next round picks with their scouting teams and new partners. Yes this would add some time into the alliance selection process, but it would be so beneficial to the overall competition. As the captains out of the field are frequently members of the competition team, they haven't seen enough matches to make informed arguments with their other partner.
********************
As a thought of discussion:
What if there was the "Wheel of Fortune" picking rule where you loose your turn if you pick a team that is already in an alliance? Would this reduce the ill-prepared, or would it just be adding injury to embarrassment?
********************
Another thought. If you notice that a young team is doing well enough that they could be in the position to be an alliance captain, go up and remind them of the importance of making a pick list. If you are "mentoring" another team, make sure they do this.
Well the worst I heard was someone told me a team was picking down the list on the screen and was turn down by every team and eventually ended up picking themselves. Right then and there someone probably should have stepped in to help them.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #32   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2011, 12:56
Grim Tuesday's Avatar
Grim Tuesday Grim Tuesday is offline
Registered User
AKA: Simon Bohn
FRC #0639 (Code Red)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Baltimore MD (JHU)
Posts: 1,607
Grim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Is alliance selection usually this bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Howard View Post
That's because there is no real single way to scout. Many teams do it different ways. Some teams go strictly off the Scoreboard and ranking. Others take other things into account. Some do both. Some teams run a server with a dedicated scouting team in the stands. We've done this with great success since 2008.

There isn't a right or wrong way to scout. It really comes down to what factors are important to your team.
There is a wrong way: Not scouting at all, like the team who just picked down the rankings.
Reply With Quote
  #33   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2011, 13:03
Koko Ed's Avatar
Koko Ed Koko Ed is offline
Serial Volunteer
AKA: Ed Patterson
FRC #0191 (X-Cats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Rochester,NY
Posts: 22,954
Koko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Is alliance selection usually this bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim Tuesday View Post
There is a wrong way: Not scouting at all, like the team who just picked down the rankings.
Worst form of scouting ever:

"Anyone want to get picked make some noise!"
This actually happened at Buckeye in 2008.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #34   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2011, 13:07
The Lucas's Avatar
The Lucas The Lucas is offline
CaMOElot, it is a silly place
AKA: My First Name is really "The" (or Brian)
FRC #0365 (The Miracle Workerz); FRC#1495 (AGR); FRC#4342 (Demon)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Dela-Where?
Posts: 1,564
The Lucas has a reputation beyond reputeThe Lucas has a reputation beyond reputeThe Lucas has a reputation beyond reputeThe Lucas has a reputation beyond reputeThe Lucas has a reputation beyond reputeThe Lucas has a reputation beyond reputeThe Lucas has a reputation beyond reputeThe Lucas has a reputation beyond reputeThe Lucas has a reputation beyond reputeThe Lucas has a reputation beyond reputeThe Lucas has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to The Lucas
Re: Is alliance selection usually this bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Koko Ed View Post
Worst form of scouting ever:

"Anyone want to get picked make some noise!"
This actually happened at Buckeye in 2008.
That actually just happened at SVR, leading to this discussion. We have had some misplaced teams and head-scratching picks at Philly but noting that bad. Most of the questionable picks are made with quickly, so there must have been some thought process behind them.
__________________
Electrical & Programming Mentor ---Team #365 "The Miracle Workerz"
Programming Mentor ---Team #4342 "Demon Robotics"
Founding Mentor --- Team #1495 Avon Grove High School
2007 CMP Chairman's Award - Thanks to all MOE members (and others) past and present who made it a reality.
Robot Inspector
"I don't think I'm ever more ''aware'' than I am right after I burn my thumb with a soldering iron"
Reply With Quote
  #35   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2011, 13:12
CallieJ's Avatar
CallieJ CallieJ is offline
The Girl With the Spirit Tattoos
FRC #1868 (Space Cookies)
Team Role: Scout
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 53
CallieJ is a splendid one to beholdCallieJ is a splendid one to beholdCallieJ is a splendid one to beholdCallieJ is a splendid one to beholdCallieJ is a splendid one to beholdCallieJ is a splendid one to beholdCallieJ is a splendid one to beholdCallieJ is a splendid one to behold
Re: Is alliance selection usually this bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by lineskier View Post
After watching SVR and watching the alliance selection, I can't believe how bad some of the alliance selection has been. The fact that 691 wasn't picked at all is mind boggling to me. Maybe its just me, but alliance selection seems horribly unorganized and is costing some teams banners.
I was the team representative for team 1868 for alliance selection, and we pushed very strongly to select 691 since we had worked well with them in our qualification matches. We had covered this choice with 1323 beforehand and agreed they were the best choice.

However, when I was on the field the representative from 1323 bypased our list (which had 691 on the top) and instead went with what one of their mentors was shouting at her from the first row of seats-604.

However, I think this was a minor concern compared to the number of declines in selection. The rankings at SVR were so strange and jumped around so much that there were teams who did not expect to be anywhere near picking position shoved in, and I think this was directly related to the amount of confusion.
__________________

2009,10,11 Silicon Valley Regional Finalists
2011 Silicon Valley Regional Chairman's Winners
2011 Sacramento Regional Champions
2011 Sacramento Regional Engineering Inspiration Award
2009 Silicon Valley Regional Engineering Inspiration Award
2006 Championships Judge's Award

www.spacecookies.org
Reply With Quote
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2011, 14:53
Nuttyman54's Avatar
Nuttyman54 Nuttyman54 is offline
Mentor, Tactician
AKA: Evan "Numbers" Morrison
FRC #5803 (Apex Robotics) and FRC #0971 (Spartan Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Seattle, WA/Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,144
Nuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Nuttyman54
Re: Is alliance selection usually this bad?

One thing that makes alliance selections particularly difficult this year is the need to assemble an alliance which can effectively play every aspect of the game. Most teams, even if they're unprepared, understand that they're looking for robots which "do it all". Typically those teams will either decline a pick from the types of teams who are unprepared to make the selection, or there aren't any left by the time they get to make their pick.

I believe this is also the reason for the large number of declines. Teams who "shouldn't" be in the top 8, or should but are unprepared, are picking teams who they perceive as "Good" without giving full consideration to whether the teams complement each other. A team with great tube scoring but no minibot and no ubertube that ends up top 8 will probably be declined by a team who also doesn't have a minibot, because they know it will put them at a disadvantage.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #37   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2011, 15:15
Laaba 80 Laaba 80 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Joey
FRC #1714 (MORE Robotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 495
Laaba 80 has a reputation beyond reputeLaaba 80 has a reputation beyond reputeLaaba 80 has a reputation beyond reputeLaaba 80 has a reputation beyond reputeLaaba 80 has a reputation beyond reputeLaaba 80 has a reputation beyond reputeLaaba 80 has a reputation beyond reputeLaaba 80 has a reputation beyond reputeLaaba 80 has a reputation beyond reputeLaaba 80 has a reputation beyond reputeLaaba 80 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Is alliance selection usually this bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Koko Ed View Post
Worst form of scouting ever:

"Anyone want to get picked make some noise!"
This actually happened at Buckeye in 2008.
They picked us
__________________
Driving Record - 75-43-8
Coaching Record - 92-65
Reply With Quote
  #38   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2011, 15:35
Akash Rastogi Akash Rastogi is offline
Jim Zondag is my Spirit Animal
FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Manchester, Connecticut
Posts: 7,009
Akash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Is alliance selection usually this bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CallieJ View Post
However, when I was on the field the representative from 1323 bypased our list (which had 691 on the top) and instead went with what one of their mentors was shouting at her from the first row of seats-604..
Callie, talking things over with 1323, they told me that they were concerned about the reliability of their own minibot, so they wanted to choose someone with a fast, reliable minibot. 604 fit this bill, 691 did not.
__________________
My posts and opinions do not necessarily reflect those of my affiliated team.
['16-'xx]: Mentor FRC 2170 | ['11-'13]: Co-Founder/Mentor FRC 3929 | ['06-'10]: Student FRC 11 - MORT | ['08-'12]: Founder - EWCP (OG)
Reply With Quote
  #39   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2011, 15:52
Koko Ed's Avatar
Koko Ed Koko Ed is offline
Serial Volunteer
AKA: Ed Patterson
FRC #0191 (X-Cats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Rochester,NY
Posts: 22,954
Koko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Is alliance selection usually this bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laaba 80 View Post
They picked us
my sympathies.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #40   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2011, 16:05
Starmast3r's Avatar
Starmast3r Starmast3r is offline
Registered User
AKA: David
FRC #2159 (RoboPirates)
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: San Leandro
Posts: 1
Starmast3r is on a distinguished road
Re: Is alliance selection usually this bad?

I have to admit, being on that field saying "Team 2159 graciously declines the position of alliance captain" was probably one of the most hilarious moments of my life. Firstly, I'm not even the team captain of the RoboPirates-- I'm simply the driver that was called to be the representative of our team at the last second simply because our own captain was not feeling too well about the whole moment.

As a small, 6 member team in the finals, we were simply overwhelmed by what the judges said. Did we scout before we were called up to be an alliance captain? Yes, and no. We were solely a strong, defensive team, and we looked for teams that would balance our alliance. We had not been able to finish the other features of our robot, so we were forced to lean on our strongest feature: our two speed transmission. Team 691 and team 3256 would have been my top choices IF I would have remembered their team names. However, our mentor told us to simply decline being an alliance captain so that we would not have to worry about picking teams.

Why did plan on declining the position of alliance captain? Well, a couple of years ago, our team was an alliance captain at the Davis regional. We declined the position then, BUT the judges still allowed us to be picked. In fact, we were picked by the Fembots, team 692. I was stunned when they told us that we would not be able to compete if we declined, so I was forced to turn to my handy-dandy SVR Flier that I picked up at the last second before running on the field.

You'd be surprised at all of the people that came up to me after the alliance decisions and asked what was up. After telling them this whole story, they understood completely. Do I regret picking team 100 and team 766 for our alliance? Nope. They're all great people who I had a lot of fun with. In fact, I want to thank our good friends at team 100 for getting me out of that mess. Sure, winning is awesome, but to us, FRC is about having fun, making new friends, and spreading the values that FIRST teaches us all-- most importantly gracious professionalism. Let's keep it that way.
Reply With Quote
  #41   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2011, 16:10
KevinGoneNuts's Avatar
KevinGoneNuts KevinGoneNuts is offline
Registered User
AKA: Kevin
FRC #0675 (Tech High Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Rohnert Park
Posts: 177
KevinGoneNuts has much to be proud ofKevinGoneNuts has much to be proud ofKevinGoneNuts has much to be proud ofKevinGoneNuts has much to be proud ofKevinGoneNuts has much to be proud ofKevinGoneNuts has much to be proud ofKevinGoneNuts has much to be proud ofKevinGoneNuts has much to be proud ofKevinGoneNuts has much to be proud of
Re: Is alliance selection usually this bad?

I was out for alliance selections for team 675 and were picked by team 2456 as the 2nd team for alliance 8.

Now they could have picked any number of amazing teams, but 2456 picked us along with 2035 because they knew we were going against 254, 1538, and 751. They also picked us because our teams are friends and to go out playing alongside your friends sounds like a blast. Now correct me, but that is what I think FIRST is about. HAVING FUN!. I feel like I speak for all three teams when I say, we played the game having fun.
Reply With Quote
  #42   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2011, 16:16
synth3tk's Avatar
synth3tk synth3tk is offline
Volunteer / The Blue Alliance
AKA: David Thomas
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,005
synth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Is alliance selection usually this bad?

Heaven forbid an unprepared alliance captain picks any old team then proceeds to have fun in the elims.

Winning is great. After all, it is a competition at its core. But let's try not to put too much of an emphasis on it to the point where we're bad-mouthing a team's picking methods (or lack thereof). Next year, hopefully with the help of this community, they'll know of the different ways to scout, and its importance.

Some teams may never care. I think we'd probably just pull the old "eeny meeny miney mo" trick, or the really fun "shout if you want us to pick you!" tactic if we were ever captains. Sometimes, the lack of students (or lack of those interested in scouting) can be the reason they don't scout, either. When you've got 3 students working on the 'bot and two who drive, they're probably not going to put aside much time (if any at all) to go gather data.

Just keep in mind that no two teams are the same.

EDIT: Didn't see you post, Kevin, but it's ironic that you mentioned having fun. Took me some time to type this out.
__________________
Quote:
The difference between theory and application is that in theory, theory and application are the same; In application, they are not.

Last edited by synth3tk : 03-04-2011 at 16:18.
Reply With Quote
  #43   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2011, 16:18
XaulZan11's Avatar
XaulZan11 XaulZan11 is offline
Registered User
AKA: John Christiansen
FRC #1732
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 1,329
XaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to XaulZan11
Re: Is alliance selection usually this bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinGoneNuts View Post
Now they could have picked any number of amazing teams, but 2456 picked us along with 2035 because they knew we were going against 254, 1538, and 751. They also picked us because our teams are friends and to go out playing alongside your friends sounds like a blast. Now correct me, but that is what I think FIRST is about. HAVING FUN!. I feel like I speak for all three teams when I say, we played the game having fun.
I've seen and heard of teams doing this and it rubs me the wrong way. I would be pretty upset to work 6 weeks and give it my all during the competition only to be passed up by a team because they wanted to pick their friends. I just don't think it is fair to the other teams if you choose not to play competitively and to the best of your ability. If this was a Michigan event where you gets points for getting selected, I would be extremely upset. But, at the end of the day, its the teams right to play however they want.
Reply With Quote
  #44   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2011, 17:12
CallieJ's Avatar
CallieJ CallieJ is offline
The Girl With the Spirit Tattoos
FRC #1868 (Space Cookies)
Team Role: Scout
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 53
CallieJ is a splendid one to beholdCallieJ is a splendid one to beholdCallieJ is a splendid one to beholdCallieJ is a splendid one to beholdCallieJ is a splendid one to beholdCallieJ is a splendid one to beholdCallieJ is a splendid one to beholdCallieJ is a splendid one to behold
Re: Is alliance selection usually this bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Akash Rastogi View Post
Callie, talking things over with 1323, they told me that they were concerned about the reliability of their own minibot, so they wanted to choose someone with a fast, reliable minibot. 604 fit this bill, 691 did not.
That makes sense. I remember that they had trouble deploying their minibot in one of their matches on Saturday morning. I do wish they had conveyed that to me in our meeting so that we could have incorporated it more heavily into our pick list.

Honestly I don't think it would have made that much of a difference either way, which is why I didn't push the issue at the time. 604 and 691 are both experienced, well-developed teams who have done well this year. I for one was extremely happy with how finals turned out, given how 254 performed in finals at San Diego and in the semis and quarters at SVR.

I mostly wanted to reassure the OP that we and 1323 were aware of 691's capabilities and that they were not overlooked. The specifics of our selection are a much smaller issue than those faced by some of the teams who were present for selection. I felt unprepared to be there given the uncertainty of the rankings and the strength of the #1 alliance, and I had spent the last two days running a full-scale online scouting program as well as working with the scouts from 254. I can't imagine what it might have been like to go into that selection if you hadn't been expecting and trying to prepare for it all weekend.
__________________

2009,10,11 Silicon Valley Regional Finalists
2011 Silicon Valley Regional Chairman's Winners
2011 Sacramento Regional Champions
2011 Sacramento Regional Engineering Inspiration Award
2009 Silicon Valley Regional Engineering Inspiration Award
2006 Championships Judge's Award

www.spacecookies.org
Reply With Quote
  #45   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2011, 17:57
mwtidd's Avatar
mwtidd mwtidd is offline
Registered User
AKA: mike
FRC #0319 (Big Bad Bob)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 714
mwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Is alliance selection usually this bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by XaulZan11 View Post
I've seen and heard of teams doing this and it rubs me the wrong way. I would be pretty upset to work 6 weeks and give it my all during the competition only to be passed up by a team because they wanted to pick their friends. I just don't think it is fair to the other teams if you choose not to play competitively and to the best of your ability. If this was a Michigan event where you gets points for getting selected, I would be extremely upset. But, at the end of the day, its the teams right to play however they want.
I will just say the friends picking thing is a very real experience. Imagine going to college, applying for a job, and finding out you didn't get it because the person you were competing with for the job had an in at the company. Then its not 6 weeks but often 6 years.

In the real world perceived value and connections are almost as valuable as real value in a business deal. In a strange (and unfortunate corollary) the similar thing happens in FIRST, especially for second picks.


Quote:
Originally Posted by CallieJ View Post
That makes sense. I remember that they had trouble deploying their minibot in one of their matches on Saturday morning. I do wish they had conveyed that to me in our meeting so that we could have incorporated it more heavily into our pick list.

Honestly I don't think it would have made that much of a difference either way, which is why I didn't push the issue at the time. 604 and 691 are both experienced, well-developed teams who have done well this year. I for one was extremely happy with how finals turned out, given how 254 performed in finals at San Diego and in the semis and quarters at SVR.

I mostly wanted to reassure the OP that we and 1323 were aware of 691's capabilities and that they were not overlooked. The specifics of our selection are a much smaller issue than those faced by some of the teams who were present for selection. I felt unprepared to be there given the uncertainty of the rankings and the strength of the #1 alliance, and I had spent the last two days running a full-scale online scouting program as well as working with the scouts from 254. I can't imagine what it might have been like to go into that selection if you hadn't been expecting and trying to prepare for it all weekend.
I will say after running the numbers 604 and 691, look to be equivalent. As most people know I usually go by the #s and only the #s, and this is a perfect example where emotionally I was connected to a robot and would have preferred them. In one match I saw 691 put on quite a show, and really liked it. However after your reflections I think that you made an appropriate call.
__________________
"Never let your schooling interfere with your education" -Mark Twain

Last edited by mwtidd : 03-04-2011 at 18:02.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:02.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi