Field Crew Bragging Rights

[RobotsVsKittens]

Does anyone have updated data to include last week?

Thanks Mark for compiling the list and thanks to crew at SBPLI for making it my favorite regional to work year after year!

[Mark McLeod]

I have the data in an updated spreadsheet, but I'm in Richmond for the VA Regional and won't be able to post it for a few days.

[Fletch1373]

I believe the CT regional holds the record for earliest time the truck was packed Saturday with 6:20pm. We have photos to prove it, and our FTA txted pictures to a bunch of people(including Bill Miller, FRC director, and a few of the other FTA's and FIRST staff)

[Mark McLeod]

There are some long outliers still included here. I just haven't gone through them to eliminate the really long ones.
Partially, they are there because they could indicate the extremes to which the field crew went to get teams running, but there's still no way to tell what the cause of any single holdup might have been.

A Maximum cycle less than maybe 4 minutes higher than the average cycle time would be a flag that the field crew wasn't holding up matches to try to insure that every team is connecting properly.
Of course, the further an event falls behind, the more pressure to keep the matches moving, so it may not be consistently true throughout an event.

Avg match cycle - # teams - # matches - Matches per team - Min Cycle - Max Cycle - Event - Week

0:06:16 - 49 -- 77 -- 9 - 0:04:00 - 0:11:00 - Smokey Mountain Regional - 5
0:06:25 - 58 -- 97 - 10 - 0:05:00 - 0:13:00 - Autodesk Oregon Regional - 4
0:06:31 - 52 -- 87 - 10 - 0:05:00 - 0:10:00 - Oklahoma Regional - 3
0:06:33 - 63 - 105 - 10 - 0:04:00 - 0:13:00 - Washington DC Regional - 4
0:06:35 - 50 -- 84 - 10 - 0:05:00 - 0:14:00 - Seattle Olympic Regional - 3
0:06:36 - 50 -- 84 - 10 - 0:04:00 - 0:11:00 - SBPLI Long Island Regional - 4
0:06:36 - 57 -- 97 - 10 - 0:04:00 - 0:10:00 - Northeast Utilities FIRST Connecticut Regional - 5
0:06:39 - 50 -- 84 - 10 - 0:04:00 - 0:13:00 - Seattle Cascade Regional - 3
0:06:41 - 41 -- 74 - 11 - 0:04:00 - 0:15:00 - Lake Superior Regional - 2
0:06:42 - 52 -- 87 - 10 - 0:05:00 - 0:17:00 - BAE/Granite State Regional - 1
0:06:43 - 53 -- 89 - 10 - 0:04:00 - 0:11:00 - Boston Regional - 6
0:06:44 - 60 - 100 - 10 - 0:04:00 - 0:11:00 - San Diego Regional - 2
0:06:50 - 64 - 128 - 12 - 0:05:00 - 0:12:00 - MI State Championship - 6
0:06:54 - 62 -- 96 -- 9 - 0:05:00 - 0:15:00 - Virginia Regional - 6
0:06:54 - 52 -- 78 -- 9 - 0:05:00 - 0:11:00 - Dallas East/West Regional - 6
0:06:55 - 48 -- 80 - 10 - 0:05:00 - 0:11:00 - Peachtree Regional - 3
0:06:55 - 56 -- 94 - 10 - 0:05:00 - 0:14:00 - Greater Kansas City Regional - 2
0:06:56 - 55 -- 84 -- 9 - 0:04:00 - 0:12:00 - Philadelphia Regional - 6
0:07:00 - 42 -- 76 - 11 - 0:04:00 - 0:16:00 - Boilermaker Regional - 3
0:07:01 - 51 -- 84 - 10 - 0:05:00 - 0:30:00 - Wisconsin Regional - 2
0:07:02 - 55 -- 90 - 10 - 0:04:00 - 0:13:00 - Lone Star Regional - 3
0:07:03 - 54 -- 89 - 10 - 0:04:00 - 0:16:00 - Sacramento Regional - 3
0:07:04 - 64 - 105 - 10 - 0:05:00 - 0:19:00 - Los Angeles Regional - 4
0:07:04 - 52 -- 87 - 10 - 0:05:00 - 0:16:00 - North Carolina Regional - 6
0:07:08 - 45 -- 75 - 10 - 0:05:00 - 0:14:00 - Colorado Regional - 6
0:07:08 - 60 -- 90 -- 9 - 0:05:00 - 0:17:00 - Chesapeake Regional - 3
0:07:08 - 60 -- 90 -- 9 - 0:05:00 - 0:17:00 - North Star Regional - 5
0:07:11 - 64 -- 96 -- 9 - 0:04:00 - 0:11:00 - Alamo Regional - 1
0:07:15 - 56 -- 94 - 10 - 0:04:00 - 0:25:00 - Silicon Valley Regional - 5
0:07:16 - 52 -- 84 - 10 - 0:05:00 - 0:37:00 - Midwest Regional - 4
0:07:17 - 39 -- 65 - 10 - 0:05:00 - 0:21:00 - Pittsburgh Regional - 2
0:07:23 - 58 -- 87 -- 9 - 0:05:00 - 0:13:00 - Buckeye Regional - 6
0:07:30 - 48 -- 81 - 10 - 0:04:44 - 0:16:47 - Overall Averages
0:07:31 - 38 -- 76 - 12 - 0:05:00 - 0:26:00 - Waterford District - 2
0:07:33 - 61 -- 90 -- 9 - 0:05:00 - 0:13:00 - New Jersey Regional - 1
0:07:35 - 63 -- 95 -- 9 - 0:05:00 - 0:23:00 - 10,000 Lakes Regional - 5
0:07:37 - 43 -- 65 -- 9 - 0:05:00 - 0:12:00 - Palmetto Regional - 4
0:07:39 - 40 -- 80 - 12 - 0:05:00 - 0:12:00 - Troy District - 5
0:07:42 - 34 -- 55 - 10 - 0:05:00 - 0:13:00 - Hawaii Regional - 4
0:07:44 - 36 -- 66 - 11 - 0:05:00 - 0:15:00 - WPI Regional - 2
0:07:45 - 29 -- 62 - 13 - 0:04:00 - 0:12:00 - Utah Regional - 6
0:07:45 - 39 -- 72 - 11 - 0:05:00 - 0:23:00 - Las Vegas Regional - 5
0:07:47 - 40 -- 80 - 12 - 0:05:00 - 0:13:00 - Livonia District - 5
0:07:50 - 44 -- 74 - 10 - 0:05:00 - 0:18:00 - Finger Lakes Regional - 1
0:07:53 - 66 -- 88 -- 8 - 0:04:00 - 0:20:00 - New York City Regional - 2
0:07:56 - 60 -- 99 - 10 - 0:05:00 - 0:16:00 - Florida Regional - 2
0:08:01 - 40 -- 80 - 12 - 0:05:00 - 0:18:00 - Ann Arbor District - 4
0:08:02 - 38 -- 64 - 10 - 0:05:00 - 0:23:00 - Bayou Regional - 3
0:08:06 - 45 -- 70 -- 9 - 0:05:00 - 0:19:00 - Arizona Regional - 3
0:08:14 - 40 -- 80 - 12 - 0:04:00 - 0:17:00 - West Michigan District - 3
0:08:22 - 38 -- 76 - 12 - 0:05:00 - 0:21:00 - Kettering University District - 1
0:08:36 - 30 -- 54 - 11 - 0:06:00 - 0:20:00 - Waterloo Regional - 4
0:08:42 - 34 -- 68 - 12 - 0:05:00 - 0:22:00 - Niles District - 4
0:08:47 - 28 -- 52 - 11 - 0:05:00 - 0:19:00 - Saint Louis Regional - 3
0:08:47 - 39 -- 78 - 12 - 0:05:00 - 0:22:00 - Detroit District - 3
0:08:57 - 50 -- 84 - 10 - 0:05:00 - 0:19:00 - Israel Regional - 2
0:09:15 - 40 -- 80 - 12 - 0:05:00 - 0:28:00 - Traverse City District - 1
0:09:52 - 36 -- 59 - 10 - 0:05:00 - 0:18:00 - Greater Toronto West Regional - 5
0:09:59 - 36 -- 60 - 10 - 0:06:00 - 0:18:00 - Greater Toronto East Regional - 5

[pathew100]

Just another data point for the Michigan State Championship. We started all 128 qualification matches with 6 robots. (And all eliminations as well).

I know we had the advantage of high quality machines and field experience for all the teams but it was a great accomplishment for us!

[Mark McLeod]

I held Michigan State Championship out since it's really in a different class, much similar to Championship.

It has the distinction of teams that have all played two or more times, so there's little likelihood of a robot not being able to connect to the field and the drive teams/field crew have all been trained repeatedly at prior events.


Here are the comparable numbers:

Avg match cycle - # teams - # matches - Matches per team - Min Cycle - Max Cycle - Event - Week

0:06:50 - 64 - 128 - 12 - 0:05:00 - 0:12:00 - MI State Championship - 6

[Alex Cormier]

Originally Posted by Mark McLeod

I held Michigan State Championship out since it's really in a different class, much similar to Championship.

Both of the GTR's should be too. It was very hard to try to keep the pace going faster due to two regionals in one building doing "ping pong" matches.

It was an amazing sight to see and watch though!

[Mark McLeod]

I wondered why they were matched to such a slow pace.

They coordinated the start of one match on one field to the end of a match on the other?

[Alex Cormier]

Originally Posted by Mark McLeod

I wondered why they were matched to such a slow pace.

They coordinated the start of one match on one field to the end of a match on the other?

Yes, so East would start and then west would run right after and so on. If there was an issue with one field, we would either wait or skip to the other field. If we didn't have to do that, I would think we would easily be at the front of the pack.

[Ster]

Chiming in to comment that we did not start a single match at the Smoky Mountain Regional with a robot bypassed due to failing to connect. We also had twelve rookie teams competing.

[RobotsVsKittens]

Originally Posted by Mark McLeod

0:06:36 - 50 -- 84 - 10 - 0:04:00 - 0:11:00 - SBPLI Long Island Regional - 4
0:06:36 - 57 -- 97 - 10 - 0:04:00 - 0:10:00 - Northeast Utilities FIRST Connecticut Regional - 5

Oddly similar stats for two regionals of which I was part of the field crew!

[Alex Cormier]

Can we get an update with the CMP data?

[Mark McLeod]

Field - #teams - #matches - # per team - Target -- Avg match --- Deviation --- Min Cycle ---- Max Cycle --- Std Dev
------------------------------------------- Match Cycle -- Cycle

Archimedes - 88 ----- 147 ----- 10 ----- 0:06:00 ----- 0:06:04 ----- 0:00:04 ----- 0:04:00 ----- 0:10:00 ----- 0:01:03
Curie -------- 88 ----- 147 ----- 10 ----- 0:06:00 ----- 0:06:18 ----- 0:00:18 ----- 0:04:00 ----- 0:18:00 ----- 0:01:55
Galileo ------ 88 ----- 147 ----- 10 ----- 0:06:00 ----- 0:06:21 ----- 0:00:21 ----- 0:04:00 ----- 0:14:00 ----- 0:01:32
Newton ----- 88 ----- 147 ----- 10 ----- 0:06:00 ----- 0:06:21 ----- 0:00:21 ----- 0:05:00 ----- 0:16:00 ----- 0:01:38


Archimedes field crew wins the efficiency contest.

P.S.
I did not include the rematches on Curie and Newton in the above calculations.
On Friday both Archimedes and Galileo finished their matches before awards, while Curie (3) and Newton (1) had to finish afterwards.

[Koko Ed]

Originally Posted by Mark McLeod

Field - #teams - #matches - # per team - Target Avg - Avg match -- Deviation --- Min Cycle ---- Max Cycle --- Std Dev
----------------------------------------- Match Cycle - Cycle

Archimedes - 88 ----- 147 ----- 10 ----- 0:06:00 ----- 0:06:04 ----- 0:00:04 ----- 0:04:00 ----- 0:10:00 ----- 0:01:03
Curie ------- 88 ----- 147 ----- 10 ----- 0:06:00 ----- 0:06:18 ----- 0:00:18 ----- 0:04:00 ----- 0:18:00 ----- 0:01:55
Galileo ------ 88 ----- 147 ----- 10 ----- 0:06:00 ----- 0:06:21 ----- 0:00:21 ----- 0:04:00 ----- 0:14:00 ----- 0:01:32
Newton ----- 88 ----- 147 ----- 10 ----- 0:06:00 ----- 0:06:21 ----- 0:00:21 ----- 0:05:00 ----- 0:16:00 ----- 0:01:38


Archimedes field crew wins the efficency contest.

Curie and Archimedes team queing crews traded divisions so they both ended up affecting the rating and both crews end up Einstein.

[Mark McLeod]

Originally Posted by Koko Ed

Curie and Archimedes team queing crews traded divisions so they both ended up affecting the rating and both crews end up Einstein.

If you really want to get into the nitty gritty, there's data enough to calculate separate ratings for queuers and the personnel who did move with the field changes (Refs, scorer, field reset, cooperative teams count too).

I'll leave that to someone else though.