Championship Division question.

[Chris is me]

Originally Posted by 548swimmer

I assume the divisions are assigned so that each division is equally difficult to win. Is this right?

No.

I imagine among other reasons, no one at FIRST has such an intimate knowledge of every single robot and team that they could actually pull that off.

[548swimmer]

Originally Posted by Chris is me

No.

I imagine among other reasons, no one at FIRST has such an intimate knowledge of every single robot and team that they could actually pull that off.

I was thinking that they could use some sort of ranking system (maybe OPR?) to sort. But random should work well too.

[BrendanB]

Originally Posted by 548swimmer

I was thinking that they could use some sort of ranking system (maybe OPR?) to sort. But random should work well too.

But then you wouldn't have fun/intense eliminations like archimedes 2010, galileo 2008, and newton 2006.

[548swimmer]

Originally Posted by BrendanB

But then you wouldn't have fun/intense eliminations like archimedes 2010, galileo 2008, and newton 2006.

True. How do we find out which division is "stacked"?

[TKM.368]

Originally Posted by 548swimmer

True. How do we find out which division is "stacked"?

With a little bit of patience (actually, you don't have to wait that long), the stacked division will be revealed via posts on CD.

[Koko Ed]

Back in the day we used to be able to anticipate who was going to be in what division by using their fairly simple code for picking divisions. They have since changed that so it's not quite so easy to do so.

[kenavt]

I was wondering if FIRST tends to put teams in a division they have been in before (keep them in the same division). For example, 2337 has been in Curie 2 of 2 times. 1114 has also been in Curie 4 of 7 times. 111 has been on Newton 4 of 7 in the past seven years as well (both 1114 and 111 from TBA).

[AcesJames]

Originally Posted by kenavt

I was wondering if FIRST tends to put teams in a division they have been in before (keep them in the same division). For example, 2337 has been in Curie 2 of 2 times. 1114 has also been in Curie 4 of 7 times. 111 has been on Newton 4 of 7 in the past seven years as well (both 1114 and 111 from TBA).

Looking at TBA I've noticed a pattern as well.

176 was on Newton 02 - 06. In 07 we were on Curie, 08 was Galileo, and then 09 and 10 were Archimedes. So that's Newton 5/9, Archimedes 2/9, Curie 1/9, and Galileo 1/9. I wonder if most teams that attend CMP every year have that one division they are in more frequently than others.

[MagiChau]

Originally Posted by AcesJames

Looking at TBA I've noticed a pattern as well.

176 was on Newton 02 - 06. In 07 we were on Curie, 08 was Galileo, and then 09 and 10 were Archimedes. So that's Newton 5/9, Archimedes 2/9, Curie 1/9, and Galileo 1/9. I wonder if most teams that attend CMP every year have that one division they are in more frequently than others.

For BOB I didn't really notice a pattern for our divisions. Don't know what division we were in for '02.

'10 was Galileo
'09 was Newton
'08 was Archimedes
'07 was Archimedes
'06 was Newton
'05 was Curie
'01 was Curie

[Duke461]

Does anybody know how many teams will be at Championships this year? (assuming teams fill up the spots correctly)
And is this the list of teams that already going for sure?

[dodar]

I guess we have a little bit of a tendency: '05 Galileo, '06 Archimedes, '07 Newton, '08 Curie, '09 Archimedes, '10 Newton, '11 Here's praying we get in

[Doug G]

Originally Posted by Duke461

Does anybody know how many teams will be at Championships this year? (assuming teams fill up the spots correctly)
And is this the list of teams that already going for sure?

Last year there was 350 teams if I remember right. That's about 86/87 teams per division.

[Justin Montois]

We have been..

2004...Newton
2005...Newton
2006...Newton
2007...Newton
2008...Curie
2009...Newton
2010...Curie
2011...

Can't wait for divisions though!

[Quijas]

newton '05
newton '06
newton '07
galileo '08
curie '09
curie '10
???? '11

[nighterfighter]

Originally Posted by kenavt

I was wondering if FIRST tends to put teams in a division they have been in before (keep them in the same division). For example, 2337 has been in Curie 2 of 2 times. 1114 has also been in Curie 4 of 7 times. 111 has been on Newton 4 of 7 in the past seven years as well (both 1114 and 111 from TBA).

We've been in a different division every time we go to Worlds. (Archimedes, Curie, Galileo)

Maybe we'll get Newton this time...