Go to Post Because you know what they say, the new year doesn't begin until Dean, Dave, and Woodie drop the big one. - Jay Trzaskos [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #76   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2011, 18:45
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,529
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: Al's Annual Inspection Thread

I don't think the teams doing this are doing it because their robots drain battery that fast, they probably are just trying to be more competitive and keep that much more energy in their battery if there is no penalty for doing so.
Reply With Quote
  #77   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2011, 18:45
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,808
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Al's Annual Inspection Thread

In the IFI world this was the normal mode of charging. Get onto the field, turn your robot on, charge the tanks with either on board or off board compressor and step away.
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.
Reply With Quote
  #78   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2011, 19:51
apalrd's Avatar
apalrd apalrd is offline
More Torque!
AKA: Andrew Palardy (Most people call me Palardy)
VRC #3333
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Auburn Hills, MI
Posts: 1,347
apalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Al's Annual Inspection Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
Could we find a way to have robots run compressors while we wait for them to synch with the FMS?
In OCCRA, we connect the compressor switch to an automotive relay which runs the pump. The pressure switch is still controlling the pressure in the system, just through a relay instead of the Cortex. That way, we can bring the robots onto the field empty, turn on the power switch, and let them pump up while team introductions and vex auto are running.
__________________
Kettering University - Computer Engineering
Kettering Motorsports
Williams International - Commercial Engines - Controls and Accessories
FRC 33 - The Killer Bees - 2009-2012 Student, 2013-2014 Advisor
VEX IQ 3333 - The Bumble Bees - 2014+ Mentor

"Sometimes, the elegant implementation is a function. Not a method. Not a class. Not a framework. Just a function." ~ John Carmack
Reply With Quote
  #79   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-04-2011, 02:16
Tristan Lall's Avatar
Tristan Lall Tristan Lall is offline
Registered User
FRC #0188 (Woburn Robotics)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 2,484
Tristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Al's Annual Inspection Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by JVN View Post
If my robot starts to smoke, I don't want a head ref anywhere near it.
How nice of John to look out for the health and safety of our volunteers.

(I think he's really afraid someone is going to whip out the fire extinguisher and make sure the entire robot—not just the self-extinguishing speed controller—is good and dead.)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
Could we find a way to have robots run compressors while we wait for them to synch with the FMS?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz View Post
Get onto the field, turn your robot on, charge the tanks with either on board or off board compressor and step away.
At SVR, I had a conversation about better practices for the pneumatic system, and one very reasonable thing that came up was the idea that it's not really important from a safety perspective that the cRIO control the compressor (via robot code). Granted, the rules are the rules, so we have no such option for this year—but it would seem quite feasible to find a pressure switch with the appropriate current rating and triggering characteristics (e.g. not prone to oscillating on the margin of the pressure limit), and wire it inline with the compressor and power distribution block. (This could also be accomplished with a big, dumb relay and the existing switch.) For those teams that simply want their compressor to pressurize the tanks whenever they're low, this solution is simple and robust.

In fact, it's safer than the current implementation: there's no possibility of bad code causing the robot to ignore the pressure switch. It also renders the overpressure valve redundant to an even greater extent. (Which is great, because the overpressure valves are a hassle to set up properly, and they're often provided in the wrong configuration. Not to mention that they're not really rated for numerous cycles.)

With a relieving regulator on the low pressure side, actuators cannot overpressurize the high side. So the only way to overpressurize is via the compressor, which would be hardwired into a simple device designed to prevent that, rather than a feedback system with numerous other dependencies. It's those dependencies that give us the requirement that the off-robot compressor be controlled by the robot. Eliminate this dependency chain, and you solve the most insane part of the off-robot compressor problem—which, by the way, is as ridiculous as controlling a battery charger with the robot: sure you could, but why?

To top it all off, make sure to give teams the option to install feedback control, if they desire, by installing a pressure transducer in addition to the built-in pressure switch.

This would allow the tanks to charge whenever the robot is on. In some configurations, this could result in robot parts moving as soon as the switch is flipped, but that's not really any different from robots that use electromagnets (custom circuits). In fact, robots that leak air have the exact same theoretical problem: the lack of pressure could cause robot parts to move uncommanded...and I don't see leaky robots being banned. (Though maybe they should be....)

Note that the above presupposes that the compressor, even if off-robot, is powered by the robot (and therefore benefits from the hardwired pressure switch). I'd even be willing to entertain non-robot-based sources of air, provided that that there was an appropriate overpressure valve installed on the robot, and that the delivery device contained a gauge (and a regulator or other relief valve, as necessary) demonstrating to any observer that it was delivering no more than the maximum allowed pressure to the robot. And of course, whatever this device was, it would need to satisfy venue rules—so don't bring in a floor-mounted shop compressor.1


Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsonmw04 View Post
the question really is: When does the robot become the ROBOT? Most teams that pre-charge their robot take the position the the ROBOT begins when the starting buzzer sounds. The GDC is rather quiet on this point.
That's a longstanding annoyance of mine as well. Obviously you can't enforce the entire rulebook based on the state of a robot undergoing maintenance. As best I can reckon, the rules are unambiguously intended to apply during an inspection, and during gameplay. (If it's a full inspection, then all of the robot rules should apply; if a partial one, then only the relevant ones. If it's a game, everything applies.) This means, as a practical matter, that some rulings have to be made as the robot is placed into the starting configuration before a match: it's not illegal until you try to play with it. Until that time, teams have plausible deniability with regard to configuration issues.

Although I hesitate to frame it in these terms, getting "inspected" (i.e. a partial inspection regarding one violation in particular) right before a match is probably preferable to the inspector reporting the same violation to the referee during or following the match. If before, you've got a moment to fix the problem—in this case, simply dump the offending air. (In theory, there does exist the possibility that the team can't fix a problem, and therefore the robot could be prohibited from taking the field.2) By contrast, if the issue is reported during or immediately after the match, the sanctions from the gameplay section could be imposed (starting with a <G30> penalty, and taking it from there).

I also note that as a practical matter, inspectors will exercise discretion as to what violations would merit either of the above responses, as opposed to those violations which are minor enough to address after the match.


Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
Unfortunately, FRC does not have a rule like this gem from the SAE Aero Design rulebook: "The violations of the intent of a rule will be considered a violation of the rule itself."
I don't like the sound of that. They might as well have phrased it, "read our minds, because we're too lazy to think about the consequences of what we've written"....


1 Speaking of venue rules, since compressed gas cylinders are prohibited (to teams), that neatly rules out scuba tanks and the hassles involved with evaluating 3 000 lb/in2 regulators. I sometimes wonder if that's the hazard that FIRST was trying to avoid, when it banned all non-compressor sources of air.
2 It's my considered opinion that the 3-way red card for showing up for a match having an uninspected robot (<T03>) should only apply to a robot that did not ever pass inspection at the current event. The rules aren't clear about it, but that's a fair reading that gives the benefit of the doubt to teams, while maintaining what I would guess to be the primary intention of the rule. So, in my unofficial opinion, if you ever did find yourself in a situation where an inspector deemed the robot illegal right before a match, at least you could participate without completely ruining things for your alliance. (Best to have a pre-match conversation with the head referee and that inspector, if this ever comes up.)
Reply With Quote
  #80   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-04-2011, 13:20
MikeE's Avatar
MikeE MikeE is offline
Wrecking nice beaches since 1990
no team (Volunteer)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: New England -> Alaska
Posts: 381
MikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond repute
Talking Re: Al's Annual Inspection Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tristan Lall View Post
And of course, whatever this device was, it would need to satisfy venue rules—so don't bring in a floor-mounted shop compressor.1
+rep for using footnotes!
Reply With Quote
  #81   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-04-2011, 15:35
Alan Anderson's Avatar
Alan Anderson Alan Anderson is offline
Software Architect
FRC #0045 (TechnoKats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Kokomo, Indiana
Posts: 9,113
Alan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Al's Annual Inspection Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Retired Starman View Post
The concern I had is that the rules say all power for the robot must come from ONE battery.
Not all power. Just all electrical power.

Quote:
<R01> Energy used by FRC ROBOTS, (i.e., stored at the start of a MATCH), shall come only from the following sources:
A. Electrical energy derived from the onboard 12V battery (see Rule <R34> for specifications and further details).
B. Compressed air stored in the pneumatic system, stored at a maximum pressure of 120 PSI.
C. A change in the altitude of the ROBOT center of gravity.
D. Storage achieved by deformation of ROBOT parts.
I don't see anything wrong about having the pneumatic system charged before connecting the battery you're going to use for the match. I don't even understand why it's controversial.
Reply With Quote
  #82   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-04-2011, 15:52
plnyyanks's Avatar
plnyyanks plnyyanks is offline
Data wins arguments.
AKA: Phil Lopreiato
FRC #1124 (The ÜberBots), FRC #2900 (The Mighty Penguins)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: NYC/Washington, DC
Posts: 1,114
plnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Al's Annual Inspection Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Anderson View Post
I don't see anything wrong about having the pneumatic system charged before connecting the battery you're going to use for the match. I don't even understand why it's controversial.
I think this controversial issue in this thread is more the ability (or lack thereof) of teams to bring a second battery and pneumatic system in order to charge the one on the robot before the match without draining their match battery. The fact that pneumatic system is charged before a match is perfectly legal. The illegal issue is the using of a second battery pre-match.

Quote:
<R01> Energy used by FRC ROBOTS, (i.e., stored at the start of a MATCH), shall come only from the following sources:
A. Electrical energy derived from the onboard 12V battery (see Rule <R34> for specifications and further details).
B. Compressed air stored in the pneumatic system, stored at a maximum pressure of 120 PSI.
C. A change in the altitude of the ROBOT center of gravity.
D. Storage achieved by deformation of ROBOT parts.
Quote:
<R34> The only legal source of electrical energy for the ROBOT/HOSTBOT during the competition is one MK ES17-12 12VDC non-spillable lead acid battery, OR one EnerSys NP 18-12 battery, as provided in the 2011 KOP.
(emphasis mine)
These rules disallow the use of any other battery than the one on the robot. Therefore, it is illegal to charge pneumatic systems with any other battery pre-match. It would be legal to have the system charged before entering into the queue line EDIT: starting a match , but past that point, it would become illegal.
__________________
Phil Lopreiato - "It's a hardware problem"
Team 1124 (2010 - 2013), Team 1418 (2014), Team 2900 (2016)
FRC Notebook The Blue Alliance for Android

Last edited by plnyyanks : 23-04-2011 at 16:07.
Reply With Quote
  #83   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-04-2011, 15:59
Vikesrock's Avatar
Vikesrock Vikesrock is offline
Team 2175 Founder
AKA: Kevin O'Connor
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 3,305
Vikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Vikesrock Send a message via MSN to Vikesrock Send a message via Yahoo to Vikesrock
Re: Al's Annual Inspection Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by plnyyanks View Post
(emphasis mine)
These rules disallow the use of any other battery than the one on the robot. Therefore, it is illegal to charge pneumatic systems with any other battery pre-match. It would be legal to have the system charged before entering into the queue line, but past that point, it would become illegal.
I don't see where your assumption that the rules start applying to the robot when it enters the queue line and not before is derived from.

I am much more inclined to agree with the interpretation that the rules apply to the robot during inspection and during the match itself.
__________________


2007 Wisconsin Regional Highest Rookie Seed & Regional Finalists (Thanks 930 & 2039)
2008 MN Regional Semifinalists (Thanks 2472 & 1756)
2009 Northstar Regional Semifinalists (Thanks 171 & 525)
Reply With Quote
  #84   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-04-2011, 16:06
plnyyanks's Avatar
plnyyanks plnyyanks is offline
Data wins arguments.
AKA: Phil Lopreiato
FRC #1124 (The ÜberBots), FRC #2900 (The Mighty Penguins)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: NYC/Washington, DC
Posts: 1,114
plnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond reputeplnyyanks has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Al's Annual Inspection Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vikesrock View Post
I don't see where your assumption that the rules start applying to the robot when it enters the queue line and not before is derived from.
My use of the queue line in that example was more of an arbitrary point of when it becomes illegal. That isn't specified in the rules anywhere, and it probably wasn't a good decision to include that as a point. It just seemed to me that upon entering the queue line, it becomes much more problematic for a team to backcharge their pneumatics (my team got stopped for doing this in queue last year in Atlanta). Anyway, I'm sorry for using my own assumptions instead of the rules.
__________________
Phil Lopreiato - "It's a hardware problem"
Team 1124 (2010 - 2013), Team 1418 (2014), Team 2900 (2016)
FRC Notebook The Blue Alliance for Android
Reply With Quote
  #85   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-04-2011, 16:07
Mark McLeod's Avatar
Mark McLeod Mark McLeod is offline
Just Itinerant
AKA: Hey dad...Father...MARK
FRC #0358 (Robotic Eagles)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Hauppauge, Long Island, NY
Posts: 8,940
Mark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Al's Annual Inspection Thread

Quote:
<R34> The only legal source of electrical energy for the ROBOT/HOSTBOT during the competition is one MK ES17-12 12VDC non-spillable lead acid battery, OR one EnerSys NP 18-12 battery, as provided in the 2011 KOP
I'm pretty sure that you guys that are making up your own rules about the robot queue should be restricted to ONE battery for the COMPETITION as the rule clearly states.

I'm pretty accepting of pneumatic energy being listed separately from electrical energy as a separate allowable source.
And I'm very sure that the intent of the one battery rule is solely to prevent us from driving around during a match being actively powered by two or more 12v batteries.
__________________
"Rationality is our distinguishing characteristic - it's what sets us apart from the beasts." - Aristotle

Last edited by Mark McLeod : 23-04-2011 at 16:16.
Reply With Quote
  #86   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-04-2011, 17:18
Cory's Avatar
Cory Cory is offline
Registered User
AKA: Cory McBride
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 6,825
Cory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cory
Re: Al's Annual Inspection Thread

What happened to not lawyering the rules?

It is quite clear the rules mean that DURING the MATCH power can only come from one battery.

It is not saying that at any point in time, all non electrical stored energy on your robot must have been generated by the battery that ends up on the robot during the match.
__________________
2001-2004: Team 100
2006-Present: Team 254

Last edited by Cory : 23-04-2011 at 20:03.
Reply With Quote
  #87   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-04-2011, 17:23
Mark McLeod's Avatar
Mark McLeod Mark McLeod is offline
Just Itinerant
AKA: Hey dad...Father...MARK
FRC #0358 (Robotic Eagles)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Hauppauge, Long Island, NY
Posts: 8,940
Mark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Al's Annual Inspection Thread

By <R01> there are 3 non-electrical sources of energy allowed on the robot at the start of a match.
Each source of energy is given equal ranking with all the others. Electrical does not rule over any of the others.
__________________
"Rationality is our distinguishing characteristic - it's what sets us apart from the beasts." - Aristotle

Last edited by Mark McLeod : 24-04-2011 at 07:55. Reason: Cory's rewording
Reply With Quote
  #88   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-04-2011, 19:36
MikeE's Avatar
MikeE MikeE is offline
Wrecking nice beaches since 1990
no team (Volunteer)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: New England -> Alaska
Posts: 381
MikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Al's Annual Inspection Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory View Post
What happened to not lawyering the rules?

It is quite clear the rules mean that DURING the MATCH power can only come from one battery, not at any point in time, all non electrical stored energy on your robot must have been generated by the battery that ends up on the robot during the match.
By this logic all spings, surgical tubing etc. would have to be extended by use of a battery (never mind the competition battery). That means designing and building special motor driven mechanisms purely to pull a spring or piece of surgical tubing into a starting configuration, rather than do it manually.

The more parsimonious approach is to take <R01> as written and accept any (safe) original source of energy to be converted to the allowable stored energy devices.
Reply With Quote
  #89   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-04-2011, 22:01
Jon Stratis's Avatar
Jon Stratis Jon Stratis is offline
Mentor, LRI, MN RPC
FRC #2177 (The Robettes)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,844
Jon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Al's Annual Inspection Thread

Not being very well versed in pneumatics, this thread has certainly taken an educational turn!

Personally, I don't have a problem with teams using a battery to charge pneumatics, and then a different battery to run the match - I think that is clearly within the rules.

However, I do have to acknowledge the potential safety aspect involved here... Turning on a robot while in line to charge pneumatics only provides a chance for mechanisms to act unexpectedly (as someone accidentally leans on controls, for example). Thus far, all of the systems I've seen have a single storage portion, that vents to the pneumatic solenoids to be controlled - it would seem simple to put a manual valve in place there to manually turn off the working portion of the pneumatic system, and allow safe storage. Then once on the field and in position, that manual valve could be turned, allowing the system to "go live" in a safe way - much the same as safety pins and lockouts that teams put in place during transport and pull once they are on the field.

Thoughts? This could be a nice safety feature...
Reply With Quote
  #90   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-04-2011, 23:31
PAR_WIG1350's Avatar
PAR_WIG1350 PAR_WIG1350 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Alan Wells
FRC #1350 (Rambots)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,190
PAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Al's Annual Inspection Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle33199 View Post
Not being very well versed in pneumatics, this thread has certainly taken an educational turn!

Personally, I don't have a problem with teams using a battery to charge pneumatics, and then a different battery to run the match - I think that is clearly within the rules.

However, I do have to acknowledge the potential safety aspect involved here... Turning on a robot while in line to charge pneumatics only provides a chance for mechanisms to act unexpectedly (as someone accidentally leans on controls, for example). Thus far, all of the systems I've seen have a single storage portion, that vents to the pneumatic solenoids to be controlled - it would seem simple to put a manual valve in place there to manually turn off the working portion of the pneumatic system, and allow safe storage. Then once on the field and in position, that manual valve could be turned, allowing the system to "go live" in a safe way - much the same as safety pins and lockouts that teams put in place during transport and pull once they are on the field.

Thoughts? This could be a nice safety feature...

the pressure would drop as soon as you connected the two halves so you would start with less air.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:13.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi