|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 20 for 20?
The blue alliance only dates back to '03 so you'll have to ask one of the mentors from one of the 20 years teams.
20 year old teams Team 20 - "The Rocketeers", Clifton Park, NY Team 45 - "The TechnoKats Robotics Team", Kokomo, IN Team 126 - "Gael Force", Clinton, MA Team 148 - "Robowranglers", Greenville, TX Team 151 - "Tough Techs", Nashua, NH Team 190 - "Gompei and the H.E.R.D.", Worcester, MA Team 191 - "X-CATS", Rochester, NY |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 20 for 20?
Quote:
Someone might correct me on this, but I've never heard of 151 being considered an original and sustaining team. There are a number of NH teams, including 319, that were invited to "pilot" some games pre-season earlier in FIRST history, and were ineligible to compete in the challenge that year. As such they lost the "sustaining" aspect of the grandfather clause (debatable, but it's how FIRST considers it). I believe that 151 is also one of those teams. Other teams which competed in 1992 but are not considered sustained include 111 Wildstang and 97 The Cow |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 20 for 20?
Heh, "20 for 20" is team 20's slogan this year. I believe we have been to championships every year, but not positive.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 20 for 20?
Quote:
I wonder if anyone would lose sustaining status if they took a year off? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|