Go to Post I say we just organize a top-secret raid into FIRST HQ one night. - Steven Donow [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Pneumatics
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-05-2011, 16:13
Randy Forgaard's Avatar
Randy Forgaard Randy Forgaard is offline
Parent 1729, former mentor 3126
FRC #7129
Team Role: Parent
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Hollis, NH, USA
Posts: 48
Randy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to behold
Re: Slowing down the action of a cylinder with flow control, mechanical or via softwa

Quote:
Originally Posted by jspatz1 View Post
A hard stop on the cylinder will probably not be any less problematic than a hard stop on the frame (it will still "slam"), and is very hard on the cylinder itself.

It is always easy to shorten the working length of a cylinder. Simply add a spacer between the clevis and the nose of the cylinder, so that it bottoms out externally on the spacer instead of internally on the piston. You can always use a cylinder that is a little longer than needed with this technique, but you can't get more stroke out of a cylinder that is too short.
All good points, many thanks. That's a very good point about shortening the working length of the cylinder, and that a hard stop on a cylinder is at least as hard (and damaging) as a hard stop on the frame.

I am inclined to have us look carefully at your suggestions in your earlier post about reworking the design of the arm to use springs, counterweights, and/or shock absorbers to more organically use the pneumatics for what it is intended. We will also experiment with flow control fittings (we just ordered some this afternoon) to see if that might get us most of the way there, since it's such an easy solution.

Thank you again!
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-05-2011, 18:26
Randy Forgaard's Avatar
Randy Forgaard Randy Forgaard is offline
Parent 1729, former mentor 3126
FRC #7129
Team Role: Parent
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Hollis, NH, USA
Posts: 48
Randy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to behold
Re: Slowing down the action of a cylinder with flow control, mechanical or via softwa

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tristan Lall View Post
There seem to be some errors in the information being given here. Let me try to clarify.

Flow control fittings are permitted (if they are "connecting fittings"). Flow control valves (and check valves, incidentally) are not permitted (because they're not any of the things permitted by <R66> and the rest of the pneumatics rules).

The fittings Chris was referring to are like an NPT-to-tubing elbow connector, with a needle-type adjustable flow control screw built in. Those are almost certainly legal, because they are usually understood to be a type of fitting. A flow control valve, that isn't also a fitting, is almost certainly illegal.

At an off-season event, do whatever the organizers require. If they're alright with teams taking reasonable liberties, go right ahead. (Usually there's no inspection.)
Tristan: That makes a lot of sense to me. Thanks for pointing out that distinction between flow control fittings and flow control valves. This afternoon, we ordered some flow control fittings, with 1/8" NPT ports that screw right into the exhaust ports on the Festo valves. As fittings, those would seem to be within the spirit of the rules.

Interestingly, there was actually a question on the official Q&A about the legality of using flow controls. The questioner pointed out that in the Pneumatics Manual Rev B for 2011, the sample pneumatics diagram on Page 8, and the photos on Pages 9-10, show flow control fittings screwed into ALL of the cylinder ports. These are the NPT-to-tubing fittings with the needle-type flow control screws that you referred to above. But somewhat confusingly, <R66> seems to say that only the items it specifically lists are allowed in a pneumatics circuit on the robot, and flow controls are not specifically listed in <R66>. The questioner asked for a clarification on this apparent contradiction from the GDC. Unfortunately, the GDC's response was simply that "All pneumatic valves must comply with Rule <R66>," which still (to my mind) would seem to leave the answer ambiguous.

The wording of <R66> seems to add to the confusion, since it simply provides a list of "pneumatic system items" that are "specifically permitted," and <R67> lists pneumatic items that are prohibited. But what about the pneumatic items that are in the "no-man's land"; i.e., not shown on either the <R66> list or the <R67> list? Strictly speaking, it would seem that both flow control fittings and flow control valves are in this no-man's land.

However, <R66> Paragraph E does allow for unaltered COTS "connecting fittings" with a working pressure of at least 125psi. Does a flow control fitting that also provides connection to a tube count as a connecting fitting (which is legal), or is it a pneumatics part that provides extra functionality and thus it not permitted because it is not specifically listed as permitted in <R66>?

The point is mostly moot, because the official competitions are over for the year, and as you point out, most off-season competitions don't even do inspections. So, we'll feel free to use flow control fittings and not worry about it. But I kind of wish the GDC had made an explicit ruling to allow them. Maybe this ambiguity will be cleared up in next year's competition.

Thanks again for your thoughtful (and helpful) response, and for clarifying the difference between the two types of flow controls.

Last edited by Randy Forgaard : 06-05-2011 at 18:36.
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-05-2011, 13:45
jreuter jreuter is offline
Registered User
FRC #1073 (Force Team)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Hollis, NH
Posts: 33
jreuter has a spectacular aura aboutjreuter has a spectacular aura about
Re: Slowing down the action of a cylinder with flow control, mechanical or via softwa

Randy:

If you take a close look at the 2011 pnuematics manual, you will see flow control devices in both the schematic and photographs. The SMC NAS2201F-N01-07S flow control device was included in the 2008 KoP, and previous years, if I recall. We have some of these in our shop if your shipment doesn't arrive in time. Give me a call if you need them.

Also, you can indeed use separate Festos to switch between a high flow and low flow path, as long as you use a separate control signal for each one. You are correct that you are not allowed to control two valves from one control signal.

I have also read CD postings of people who rotate the valves with servos to provide software control of the flow rate.

With regard to rapid on/off pulses to the Festos, 1073 did this in 2010 to provide software-control preload pressures in our kicker. I was amazed that the Festos were so responsive, but we got very repeatable results, with no observed reliability problems.

Good luck at Beantown!
-Jeff
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-05-2011, 14:51
Randy Forgaard's Avatar
Randy Forgaard Randy Forgaard is offline
Parent 1729, former mentor 3126
FRC #7129
Team Role: Parent
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Hollis, NH, USA
Posts: 48
Randy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to behold
Re: Slowing down the action of a cylinder with flow control, mechanical or via softwa

Hey, Jeff, great to hear from you!

Quote:
Originally Posted by jreuter View Post
If you take a close look at the 2011 pnuematics manual, you will see flow control devices in both the schematic and photographs. The SMC NAS2201F-N01-07S flow control device was included in the 2008 KoP, and previous years, if I recall. We have some of these in our shop if your shipment doesn't arrive in time. Give me a call if you need them.
That is great info, thank you. I noticed those elbow-shaped, flow-control, 1/8" NPT to 1/4" O.D. quick-release fittings in the 2011 pneumatics manual on Page 8 (diagram) and the photos (Pages 9-10), but until your message, I wasn't sure where to get those flow control fittings. I'm still a little confused why <R66> doesn't specifically list flow control fittings as an allowed pneumatics part. But the universal opinion here on this thread seems to be that flow control fittings are allowed (falling under the category of "connecting fittings" in <R66> paragraph E), whereas flow control valves (separate inline flow-control components) are not.

Anyway thanks so much for the SMC NAS2201F-N01-07S part number for those flow-control elbow fittings from the 2008 KOP and earlier. I just now ordered some, which should arrive in a few days. If we run into trouble receiving them, though, we might take you up on your offer to borrow a couple of them from your team, much appreciated!

One odd thing about using the flow control fittings on the cylinders themselves is that it seems like it will reduce the flow of air in both directions -- going into the cylinder in one direction, and exhausting from the cylinder in the other direction. We don't really want to slow down the flow of air into the cylinder, we're just trying to slow down the exhaust from the cylinder, to control the speed of the action. It seems like the ideal place to install a flow control fitting would be on the exhaust ports of the Festos, so that the flow control would only be used on the exhaust. In fact, I ordered and received some very nice $3 flow control fittings specifically designed for the exhaust ports of solenoid valves. But when I received them, I remembered that the Festo valves have these odd port threads (they are 7mm threaded ports, if I remember correctly), rather than the 1/8" NPT threading that I assumed they had, so we will need to use some kind of fitting adapters if we want to use them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jreuter View Post
Also, you can indeed use separate Festos to switch between a high flow and low flow path, as long as you use a separate control signal for each one.
Cool idea! We could start with a high flow path to raise our arm, and as it reaches the top, we could switch to a low flow path to slow down its motion so it won't slam so hard into the top.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jreuter View Post
With regard to rapid on/off pulses to the Festos, 1073 did this in 2010 to provide software-control preload pressures in our kicker. I was amazed that the Festos were so responsive, but we got very repeatable results, with no observed reliability problems.
That's great to know. We'll hold that idea in our bag of tricks as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jreuter View Post
Good luck at Beantown!
-Jeff
Many thanks! And if 1073 is going to the Beantown Blitz, good luck to you folks as well!

-- Randy
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-05-2011, 15:09
kwotremb's Avatar
kwotremb kwotremb is offline
Registered User
FRC #3414
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 127
kwotremb is a splendid one to beholdkwotremb is a splendid one to beholdkwotremb is a splendid one to beholdkwotremb is a splendid one to beholdkwotremb is a splendid one to beholdkwotremb is a splendid one to behold
Re: Slowing down the action of a cylinder with flow control, mechanical or via softwa

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy Forgaard View Post
One odd thing about using the flow control fittings on the cylinders themselves is that it seems like it will reduce the flow of air in both directions -- going into the cylinder in one direction, and exhausting from the cylinder in the other direction. We don't really want to slow down the flow of air into the cylinder, we're just trying to slow down the exhaust from the cylinder, to control the speed of the action. It seems like the ideal place to install a flow control fitting would be on the exhaust ports of the Festos, so that the flow control would only be used on the exhaust. In fact, I ordered and received some very nice $3 flow control fittings specifically designed for the exhaust ports of solenoid valves. But when I received them, I remembered that the Festo valves have these odd port threads (they are 7mm threaded ports, if I remember correctly), rather than the 1/8" NPT threading that I assumed they had, so we will need to use some kind of fitting adapters if we want to use them.
Sorry with using your terminology, but we did use the fittings. Just as you say above, we placed it on the exhaust port of the valve so it only effected the flow in one direction. Good luck and I hope you figure all of this out.
__________________
2013: Team 3414 Hackbots
Waterford District: Finalist (51, 3604)
Livonia District: Winner (3641, 240), Spirit Award
MSC: 6th Seed Captain (862, 3641), Spirit Award
Worlds: Seeded 32 in Curie


Past Years:
Team 3414: Hackbots, 2013-Current, Mentor
Team 818: Steel Armadillos, 2008-2012, Mentor
Team 93: N.E.W Apple Corps, 2002-2003, Student
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-05-2011, 16:18
Mark McLeod's Avatar
Mark McLeod Mark McLeod is online now
Just Itinerant
AKA: Hey dad...Father...MARK
FRC #0358 (Robotic Eagles)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Hauppauge, Long Island, NY
Posts: 8,867
Mark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Slowing down the action of a cylinder with flow control, mechanical or via softwa

If you're using a double solenoid, then you can just turn it off (rather than reversing it) to stop the additional flow of compressed air before the cylinder reaches the end of it's travel. Probably using an adjustable reed switch feedback (fairly exact final pressure), or less reliably-time, to signal when to stop adding air. That would result in a lower final pressure in the cylinder than the 60-30psi you might be operating from, but it'd start with full pressure to make it move, then have lower than normal pressure by the time it hit the stop.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy Forgaard View Post
One odd thing about using the flow control fittings on the cylinders themselves is that it seems like it will reduce the flow of air in both directions --

Cool idea! We could start with a high flow path to raise our arm, and as it reaches the top, we could switch to a low flow path to slow down its motion so it won't slam so hard into the top.
The flow control fittings typically only restrict the air flow in one direction if that's what you are worried about.
For instance, NAS2201F-N01-07S translates to: 1/4" elbow, meter-out, one-touch fitting, NPT, 1/8"port, 1/4" tubing, with seal.
The fittings are marked on the side with a large arrow (no restriction) and a small arrow (restricted flow) showing the direction.
(Added a photo showing the flow arrows)

A side note on the high flow/low flow switching idea.
Just be careful in your design to use only one solenoid value per<R74>.
Quote:

<R74> Each commanded motion of a pneumatic cylinder or rotary actuator must be accomplished via the flow of compressed air through only one approved pneumatic valve. Plumbing the outputs from multiple valves together into the same input on a pneumatic cylinder is prohibited.
Restricting the flow from the exhaust port of a single valve would affect both extension and retraction of the same cylinder if the valve is connected to both ends.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	FlowControl.jpg
Views:	18
Size:	128.1 KB
ID:	10692  
__________________
"Rationality is our distinguishing characteristic - it's what sets us apart from the beasts." - Aristotle

Last edited by Mark McLeod : 12-05-2011 at 18:27. Reason: Added photo
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-05-2011, 17:11
Randy Forgaard's Avatar
Randy Forgaard Randy Forgaard is offline
Parent 1729, former mentor 3126
FRC #7129
Team Role: Parent
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Hollis, NH, USA
Posts: 48
Randy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to behold
Re: Slowing down the action of a cylinder with flow control, mechanical or via softwa

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark McLeod View Post
The flow control fittings typically only restrict the air flow in one direction if that's what you are worried about.
For instance, NAS2201F-N01-07S translates to: 1/4" elbow, meter-out, one-touch fitting, NPT, 1/8"port, 1/4" tubing, with seal. The fittings are marked on the side with a large arrow (no restriction) and a small arrow (restricted flow) showing the direction.
Mark -- Ah, that's very useful info. I didn't understand what "meter out" meant, but now I get it. That's a clever fitting. I also found a description of the NAS2201F-N01-07S which says the same thing you said, that flow is only restricted from the threaded port (i.e., the cylinder) to the tube, but is free-flowing from the tube to the threaded port (cylinder). So, we can restrict the exhaust, without impeding the inflow of air when moving the cylinder in the opposite direction. Sounds perfect, and it appears the NAS2201F-N01-07S fittings I ordered today will do the trick. Many thanks!
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-05-2011, 17:17
JamesCH95's Avatar
JamesCH95 JamesCH95 is offline
Hardcore Dork
AKA: JCH
FRC #0095 (The Grasshoppers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Enfield, NH
Posts: 1,885
JamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Slowing down the action of a cylinder with flow control, mechanical or via softwa

Regardless of its legality (IMHO I think it would be legal, and very cool) I think your ideal solution would be to use something like this electronic flow control unit. You could reduce the flow of air into the piston as it reaches the end of its travel.

Alternatively, if you relied on gravity to bring the arm down rather than power it (more efficient on air usage) you you program a duty cycle into the "lift" solenoid valve, i.e. when the arm is initially lifting the solenoid valve is open 100% of the time, but as your arm nears the top of it's travel the solenoid would proportionally reduce its duty cycle as appropriate.

Using a fixed flow control valve will penalize you in overall ground-to-lifted time (if you will) but would work just fine. My second idea doesn't cost you any weight either, which is always good Just throwing a few more ideas at you!
__________________
Theory is a nice place, I'd like to go there one day, I hear everything works there.

Maturity is knowing you were an idiot, common sense is trying to not be an idiot, wisdom is knowing that you will still be an idiot.
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-05-2011, 18:03
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,798
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Slowing down the action of a cylinder with flow control, mechanical or via softwa

Adding to my rules list for next year.
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-05-2011, 18:06
Jared Russell's Avatar
Jared Russell Jared Russell is offline
Taking a year (mostly) off
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs), FRC #0341 (Miss Daisy)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,080
Jared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Slowing down the action of a cylinder with flow control, mechanical or via softwa

Sounds like flow control fittings + some counterforce (surgical tubing or gas spring) should address the issues you are encountering.

Slightly off topic, but does anyone know if Bimba spring return pistons have a "constant force" spring or a Hooke's law linear spring on their return? If it's the latter, using a spring return piston could also address this problem (increasing resistance force as the piston nears full extension).
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-05-2011, 18:15
Mark McLeod's Avatar
Mark McLeod Mark McLeod is online now
Just Itinerant
AKA: Hey dad...Father...MARK
FRC #0358 (Robotic Eagles)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Hauppauge, Long Island, NY
Posts: 8,867
Mark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Slowing down the action of a cylinder with flow control, mechanical or via softwa

I think they are just constant force springs.
If I get a chance I'll check one of ours.
__________________
"Rationality is our distinguishing characteristic - it's what sets us apart from the beasts." - Aristotle
  #27   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-05-2011, 22:13
Randy Forgaard's Avatar
Randy Forgaard Randy Forgaard is offline
Parent 1729, former mentor 3126
FRC #7129
Team Role: Parent
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Hollis, NH, USA
Posts: 48
Randy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to beholdRandy Forgaard is a splendid one to behold
Re: Slowing down the action of a cylinder with flow control, mechanical or via softwa

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesCH95 View Post
Regardless of its legality (IMHO I think it would be legal, and very cool) I think your ideal solution would be to use something like this electronic flow control unit. You could reduce the flow of air into the piston as it reaches the end of its travel.
I like the idea. However, I don't know if we could talk the GDC into allowing an electronic flow control valve next year. The pneumatic rules seem to be written so that on any robot, if you bleed the stored air at the manual pressure vent plug valve, there will be no stored air left in the system. If an electronic flow control valve were permitted, then in theory, it seems like the software could completely close the electronic flow control valve and leave stored air in the system. Manually-set flow-control fittings (and regular manual inline flow-control valves) presumably wouldn't have this problem, because even though they constrain air flow, they probably wouldn't be manually set to completely block air flow, because that would make them fairly useless on the robot.

It would be really cool if the GDC relaxed the pneumatic rules a bit, though. It would be nice to use tricks so that pneumatic control could be almost as flexible as motor control.
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-05-2011, 09:34
Rob Stehlik's Avatar
Rob Stehlik Rob Stehlik is offline
Registered User
FRC #0610 (Coyotes)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 101
Rob Stehlik is a glorious beacon of lightRob Stehlik is a glorious beacon of lightRob Stehlik is a glorious beacon of lightRob Stehlik is a glorious beacon of lightRob Stehlik is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Slowing down the action of a cylinder with flow control, mechanical or via softwa

We used the SMC flow control fittings (both elbow and inline) on our arm and minibot deployment this year. They make all the difference when trying to smooth out the motion of an air cylinder. As was mentioned, they only work in one direction, so you can have independent settings for extension and retraction. This was especially helpful with our arm, which would slam down when we retracted it in a near vertical orientation.
Another thing that may be worth looking into is air cylinders with cushioning built in. Most air cylinders are available with internal air cushions at the end of stroke to prevent damage due to excessive impact.
  #29   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-05-2011, 10:57
MechEng83's Avatar
MechEng83 MechEng83 is online now
Lead Mentor/Engineer
AKA: Mr. Cool
FRC #1741 (Red Alert)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: May 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 617
MechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond reputeMechEng83 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Slowing down the action of a cylinder with flow control, mechanical or via softwa

Another strictly mechanical option (though possibly not the most elegant) would be to add an accumulator tank to your exhaust and then put one of the flow control fittings on the other end of the tank.
What this would do is allow for quick initial exhaust (nearly the same speed as if you vented directly to atmosphere) as the tank is filled but as pressure builds up in the accumulator (since the outlet is restricted) the exhaust will be slowed, meaning your end of stroke should move slower, essentially the same as if you just put the flow control fitting directly on the exhaust port.

The effectiveness would vary depending on the size of your cylinder and accumulator. If your accumulator is too large, it will have almost no effect, if it's too small, you'll slow down very quickly.
  #30   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-05-2011, 22:25
jspatz1's Avatar
jspatz1 jspatz1 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jeff
FRC #1986 (Team Titanium)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Lee's Summit, MO
Posts: 836
jspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to jspatz1
Re: Slowing down the action of a cylinder with flow control, mechanical or via softwa

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesCH95 View Post
Regardless of its legality (IMHO I think it would be legal, and very cool) I think your ideal solution would be to use something like this electronic flow control unit. You could reduce the flow of air into the piston as it reaches the end of its travel.
Such a device would not be legal. Not because of pneumatics rules, but because of control system rules. No electromechanical devices are allowed other than the KOP motors, servos, and permitted solenoid valves. Several teams last year inquired about using electronic regulators as a way of varying the air pressure for kicking, but they were disallowed because they involve a electromechanical actuator of some kind. Output signals may only control KOP motors, servos, and solenoid valves.
__________________
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 00:06.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi