|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#46
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
Out of curiosity, what drive trains did make it to Einstein this year?
|
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
6 and 8WDs
|
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
Quote:
|
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
|
|
#50
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
Still, not a lot of teams have done it well. I don't think, either, that lack of knowhow is the culprit.
|
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
Quote:
Good luck is also required. For example, one could argue that 148 suffered from a qualifying schedule that was too easy. They were third seed because their opponents didn't put up enough points. Had they been first seed, the entire alliance selection on Newton would have gone down differently - but this is nothing more than a bit of bad luck. |
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
Quote:
Didn't everyone think that if 1114 and 469 got together they would win last year? How well did that work out? And wasn't it supposed to be whoever won Newton in 2006? And wasn't Newton being written off in 07? And wasn't the Archimedes "super division" in 2005 supposed to create the division champion? Quote:
The bad rep that mecanums get is acquired from... physics. High end teams don't like sacrificing ~30% of their power and a good chunk of friction. |
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
And weight/precision machining time. Mecanums require 4 gearboxes. 6/8wd requires 2 and even 51's H and 148's (2010) Nonadrive only really need 3.
|
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
Quote:
No arguing with that last point though. |
|
#55
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
Has anyone compared to the percentage of teams that use mecanum to the percentage of 6/8 wheel drive? I wish I had my scouting notes from the past few years, but I think they would be surprisingly close. Its easy to look at the top teams (111, 217, 148, 1114, 254...) and say that barely anyone uses mecanum drive, but there are a lot of average to below average teams that use mecanum drive every year.
|
|
#56
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
The issue with mecanum drives at the high level of play is you are pretty much screwed against a decent defender. The idea of strafing out of the way, or dancing around a team that is actually playing smart defense (which is not what most average teams play in average qualifying matches) is just silly.
If you're the number two scorer on the alliance, it's not a hindrance (or if you're not playinh capable defense), but don't plan on being the top scorer. |
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
Do keep in mind though, the semifinals came entirely down to the minibot coin flip in match 1, and the finals were 2v3. While 254 / 111 / 973 was undoubtedly the better alliance, it was certainly not predetermined.
|
|
#58
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
It is true that defense can be tough on a mecanum robot. However, it is an exaggeration to say that mecanum is screwed against good defense.
I'll get one of my students to upload our videos, including the ones against 973. What you will see is a mixture of two things: 1) 973 wasting a good chunk of our time playing good defense, and 2) us getting around them some of the time. This is to be expected. 973 played what I thought was the best defense of any team I watched this year - they were able to stifle not just mecanum opponents but others as well. Yes, it is true that they were not only defending our robot, but that is also to be expected. It's true that mecanum isn't going to "dance around" or "drive circles around" 6WD defense. But it is not true that mecanum is helpless against defense, either. It's also not true that 6WD is strictly better against defense in every regard. Notably, a mecanum driver can more easily fake out the defender and get them to start in the wrong direction and allow you to rather quickly get past them in the other direction. I'm not saying that works all the time, but it does work some of the time. And yes, mecanum looks pretty bad when the defense is working well and wasting 20 and 30 seconds at a time. Not denying that... I'm just saying that a defender is not able to guarantee this outcome. And do remember that good defense is also capable of wasting 20 and 30 seconds of a 6WD robot's time. If one wants to argue that 6WD is better against defense than mecanum, then I can agree with that. 6WD is better at hitting the defender on their side near a corner, turning them some, and pushing past, which is a higher percentage play than trying to fake them out. I don't think it is a liability to have one offensive mecanum robot on an alliance. It does get to be a problem when you have 2 or 3 mecanum robots and you lack a good 6WD to play defense or play some other strategy that requires pushing around. Not having those strategic options available (as 973 did when they switched over to defense after presumably playing offense all season long) is, in my opinion, the bigger downside to mecanum drive. |
|
#59
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
Quote:
Quote:
It was, IMHO, very impressive. |
|
#60
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|