Go to Post If you water it and nurture it and fertilize it and put it out in the sunlight, it might just grow up to be a big lathe... :) - dlavery [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #61   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-05-2011, 19:04
Henzado Henzado is offline
Registered User
AKA: Porter Henze
FRC #1891 (Bull Bots)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Meridian, Idaho
Posts: 19
Henzado is on a distinguished road
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nemo View Post
It does get to be a problem when you have 2 or 3 mecanum robots and you lack a good 6WD to play defense or play some other strategy that requires pushing around.
Although mecanum cannot push around as other drives, I would argue that mecanum wheels can play good defense. Take for example Curie qualification match 110, where we helped save the match against arguably the fastest minibot on the field. We were on the red alliance, the robot with the folding mast who dropped their uber tube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEnahGGj9dY

I would argue,(as well as our driver) that if it wasn't for our mecannum wheels, we wouldn't have been able to slow down the team from scoring, block their way to the tower and swerve away at the last moment, ultimately making the minibot come in last. If that minibot would have gotten first, the results would have had a different out come.

Last edited by Henzado : 16-05-2011 at 12:14.
Reply With Quote
  #62   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-05-2011, 19:17
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,508
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nemo View Post
I'll get one of my students to upload our videos, including the ones against 973. What you will see is a mixture of two things: 1) 973 wasting a good chunk of our time playing good defense, and 2) us getting around them some of the time. This is to be expected. 973 played what I thought was the best defense of any team I watched this year - they were able to stifle not just mecanum opponents but others as well. Yes, it is true that they were not only defending our robot, but that is also to be expected.

I wouldn't put too much weight on any videos of us from the quarters and semis. We were trying to play zone defense, and just were not very good at it (as we never had practice). We were quick to let teams go. In the division finals and on we tried man to man, which really worked out infinitely better for us.
Reply With Quote
  #63   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-05-2011, 11:45
sgreco's Avatar
sgreco sgreco is offline
Registered User
AKA: Steven Greco
FRC #2079
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Millis
Posts: 1,031
sgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Ore View Post
Only 12 teams out of over 2,000 made it to Einstein this year. Lots of quality teams with 6WD and 8WD didn't make it either. A well done drivetrain of any type is just one part of a total robot / program that is required.
I agree and disagree. The 12 teams out of 2000 are not a simple random sample. The best teams make Einstein, and the best teams never have mechanum drives. The fact that the there is a consistent trend of simple 6WD's making Einstein and winning competitions speaks for itself. I don't think it's a coincidence by majority in numbers; it looks like a correlation to me.

(If someone has the number of mechanum teams in St. Louis, we could analyze whether the reality that they didn't make Einstein is statistically significant).

Last edited by sgreco : 16-05-2011 at 11:51.
Reply With Quote
  #64   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-05-2011, 11:52
Unsung FIRST Hero
JVN JVN is offline
@JohnVNeun
AKA: John Vielkind-Neun
FRC #0148 (Robowranglers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Greenville, Tx
Posts: 3,159
JVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year

Quote:
Originally Posted by sgreco View Post
I agree and disagree. The 12 teams out of 2000 are not a simple random sample. The best teams make Einstein, and the best teams never have mechanum drives. The fact that the there is a consistent trend of simple 6WD's making Einstein and winning competitions speaks for itself.
Has anyone gone down the top 25 list and filled in the drivetrains? I'll start, but I don't know all of them:

254 - Skid Steer
111 - Skid Steer
1114 - Skid Steer
2016 - Skid Steer
217 - Skid Steer
987 - Skid Steer
148 - Skid Steer
1503 - Skid Steer
2056 - Skid Steer
233 - Skid Steer
67 - Skid Steer
33 - Skid Steer
1717 - Swerve
469 - Skid Steer
177 - Skid Steer
71 - Swerve
40 - Swerve
2054 - ???
118 - Skid Steer
330 - Skid Steer
16 - Swerve
51 - Slide Drive
27 - Skid Steer
2826 - ???
1538 - Skid Steer

Did I get all those right (off the top of my head)?
__________________
In the interest of full disclosure: I work for VEX Robotics a subsidiary of Innovation First International (IFI) Crown Supplier & Proud Supporter of FIRST
Reply With Quote
  #65   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-05-2011, 12:17
safetycap'n111's Avatar
safetycap'n111 safetycap'n111 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eric Tornabene
FRC #0111 (Wildstang)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: May 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 16
safetycap'n111 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year

2826 had mechanum and drop down plaction wheels.

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/36224
Reply With Quote
  #66   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-05-2011, 12:23
Jared Russell's Avatar
Jared Russell Jared Russell is offline
Taking a year (mostly) off
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs), FRC #0341 (Miss Daisy)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,078
Jared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year

2054 was skid steer.

2826 had an "octacanum" drive.

The rest look right.
Reply With Quote
  #67   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-05-2011, 12:27
BrendanB BrendanB is offline
Registered User
AKA: Brendan Browne
FRC #1058 (PVC Pirates)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Londonderry, NH
Posts: 3,103
BrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post
What do you think they did to make it so it couldn't be pushed easily?

They were able to lock their rollers with some special mods and with special programming they can realign/push back against defenders while retaining their position. I remember our driver bumping into them during a match with 6 plaction wheels and they didn't move.

Unfortunately for them they had mechanical/programming issues throughout the season but knowing this team they will be back and even tougher next year.
__________________
1519 Mechanical M.A.Y.H.E.M. 2008 - 2010
3467 Windham Windup 2011 - 2015
1058 PVC Pirates 2016 - xxxx
Reply With Quote
  #68   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-05-2011, 13:41
JesseK's Avatar
JesseK JesseK is offline
Expert Flybot Crasher
FRC #1885 (ILITE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 3,695
JesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year

I think the next trick to figuring out how complex drive trains should be is clarifying which of the D/T's on Einstein (or Top25) were:
  • KOP (with perhaps sprocket gearing changes or different wheels, but all else the same)
  • 1 or 2-speed
  • Full-traction versus omni's on the corners
  • Direct-Driven
  • 4/6 motor
  • etc

Speeds in high gear may be interesting to see, but really those are more about what a team's strategy is rather than 'best drive train'. I suspect we'd see a wide variety of skid steer designs in the top ranks.
__________________

Drive Coach, 1885 (2007-present)
CAD Library Updated 5/1/16 - 2016 Curie/Carver Industrial Design Winner
GitHub
Reply With Quote
  #69   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-05-2011, 14:09
Mike Soukup's Avatar
Mike Soukup Mike Soukup is offline
Software guy
FRC #0111 (Wildstang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 797
Mike Soukup has a reputation beyond reputeMike Soukup has a reputation beyond reputeMike Soukup has a reputation beyond reputeMike Soukup has a reputation beyond reputeMike Soukup has a reputation beyond reputeMike Soukup has a reputation beyond reputeMike Soukup has a reputation beyond reputeMike Soukup has a reputation beyond reputeMike Soukup has a reputation beyond reputeMike Soukup has a reputation beyond reputeMike Soukup has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
Do keep in mind though, the semifinals came entirely down to the minibot coin flip in match 1, and the finals were 2v3. While 254 / 111 / 973 was undoubtedly the better alliance, it was certainly not predetermined.
I know that Karthik's term "minibot coin flip" has become a popular way to describe the end game this year. I'm not a big fan of Logomotion's end game, and I think the description is true, to a point. But, eventually people have to recognize and appreciate greatness. 973 had the fastest minibot on Galileo and potentially the fastest minibot at Championship. 254 chose them to guarantee 1st place in the minibot race every match.

From now on, if you use the term "minibot coin flip" to describe our matches, know that our alliance was using a coin with two heads, we called heads every match, and won every toss.
Reply With Quote
  #70   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-05-2011, 14:15
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is offline
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,718
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Soukup View Post
I know that Karthik's term "minibot coin flip" has become a popular way to describe the end game this year. I'm not a big fan of Logomotion's end game, and I think the description is true, to a point. But, eventually people have to recognize and appreciate greatness. 973 had the fastest minibot on Galileo and potentially the fastest minibot at Championship. 254 chose them to guarantee 1st place in the minibot race every match.

From now on, if you use the term "minibot coin flip" to describe our matches, know that our alliance was using a coin with two heads, we called heads every match, and won every toss.
I agree despite my post before - I meant that from a spectator point of view it didn't look obvious who the winner was. The average FIRSTer didn't know 973 had the world's fastest minibot, and that was what locked up the championship with a very strong alliance. A lot of people thought it was over when 254 picked 111 - but 973 was what firmly locked it up.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
...2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
---
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
...2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design
...2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
...2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
...2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 Minnesota 10,000 Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
Reply With Quote
  #71   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-05-2011, 14:33
JesseK's Avatar
JesseK JesseK is offline
Expert Flybot Crasher
FRC #1885 (ILITE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 3,695
JesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year

It may have been a coin-flip-minibot championship competition ... but 973's deployment was nothing short of lengendary in swinging the probability their way. That thing was ramp-style with 2 naturally-articulating degrees of freedom and 1 driven degree of freedom. It wasn't going to miss the pole by even half a degree, most of the time. I talked to them in the inspection line on Wednesday, and you could tell they put a very large amount of time into that thing before Champs.

It also didn't hurt that they had fastest drive train on the field this year (from what I saw), which gave them the advantage in getting around defense to the towers. The 254/973/1868 drive train in and of itself is an engineering marvel. The fine details of it would be appreciated by most. It's designed up against the edge of constraints in many cases and isn't replicable by most teams (since it probably couldn't be done on a non-CNC mill).
__________________

Drive Coach, 1885 (2007-present)
CAD Library Updated 5/1/16 - 2016 Curie/Carver Industrial Design Winner
GitHub
Reply With Quote
  #72   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-05-2011, 15:08
Peter Matteson's Avatar
Peter Matteson Peter Matteson is offline
Ambitious but rubbish!
FRC #0177 (Bobcat Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: South Windsor, CT
Posts: 1,653
Peter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year

Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseK View Post
I think the next trick to figuring out how complex drive trains should be is clarifying which of the D/T's on Einstein (or Top25) were:
  • KOP (with perhaps sprocket gearing changes or different wheels, but all else the same)
  • 1 or 2-speed
  • Full-traction versus omni's on the corners
  • Direct-Driven
  • 4/6 motor
  • etc

Speeds in high gear may be interesting to see, but really those are more about what a team's strategy is rather than 'best drive train'. I suspect we'd see a wide variety of skid steer designs in the top ranks.
177 used the latest revision on our 6wd that has gone through a lot of optimization over the last 6 years.

The stats:
4 CIMs
6x 4" AM performance wheels with roughtop tread.
AM shifter "guts" repackaged/repurposed and final ratios modified.
2 wheels are direct drive
~14 fps high gear
~5 fps low gear
Everything is packaged into a 2.5"x2.5" extrusion.

This year we used low gear so rarely that that our driver ocasionally forgot to shift when he got in a pushing match.
__________________
2011 Championship Finalists/Archimedes Division Championships w/ 2016 & 781
2010 Championship Winners/Newton Division Champions
Thank-you 294 & 67

2009 Newton Division Champions w/ 1507 & 121
2008 Archimedes Division Champions w/ 1124 & 1024
2007 Championship Winners/Newton Division Champions w/190, 987 & 177 The Wall of Maroon
2006 Galileo Division Champions w/ 1126 & 201
www.bobcatrobotics.org
"If you can't do it with brains, it won't be done with hours." - Clarence "Kelly" Johnson
Reply With Quote
  #73   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-05-2011, 15:34
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,097
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Matteson View Post
6x 4" ... wheels
What was your rationale for the small wheels?

I'm thinking 1) less gear reduction necessary and 2) lower center of gravity

are there other reasons?


Reply With Quote
  #74   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-05-2011, 15:35
apalrd's Avatar
apalrd apalrd is offline
More Torque!
AKA: Andrew Palardy (Most people call me Palardy)
VRC #3333
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Auburn Hills, MI
Posts: 1,347
apalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year

Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseK View Post
...he 254/973/1868 drive train in and of itself is an engineering marvel. The fine details of it would be appreciated by most. It's designed up against the edge of constraints in many cases and isn't replicable by most teams (since it probably couldn't be done on a non-CNC mill).
We (33) built a live-axle drive inspired by team 254. We made bearing blocks and cam tensioners out of 1/4" plate and cut them on a waterjet, but the bearing blocks were seriously just three holes in a line and not hard to make by hand. The shafts were lathed by hand (we used keyed shafts since they were easier to machine), and the wheels, hubs, and transmission components all came from Andymark. If you simplify the design, it isn't hard to make.

The Cheesy Poofs transmission, on the other hand, is quite difficult to replicate as basically all of the gears are custom-made by them.

33 robot stats (We were on the top 25, so that qualifies us?)
-8 wheel (6" wheels) live-axle DualDrive combining Plaction, KOP, and Lunacy wheels. Two wheels are actuated by pneumatic pistons, automatically.
-2-speed, 4-CIM transmission (5.5 and 12 ft/sec)
__________________
Kettering University - Computer Engineering
Kettering Motorsports
Williams International - Commercial Engines - Controls and Accessories
FRC 33 - The Killer Bees - 2009-2012 Student, 2013-2014 Advisor
VEX IQ 3333 - The Bumble Bees - 2014+ Mentor

"Sometimes, the elegant implementation is a function. Not a method. Not a class. Not a framework. Just a function." ~ John Carmack

Last edited by apalrd : 16-05-2011 at 15:41.
Reply With Quote
  #75   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-05-2011, 16:14
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,508
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: Mecanum Einstein this year

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post
What was your rationale for the small wheels?

I'm thinking 1) less gear reduction necessary and 2) lower center of gravity

are there other reasons?

The question I always ask the people at competitions who question are small wheels is, "Well, why do you use big wheels?".

Usually the answer is either they don't know, or they always have.

We use small wheels for a lot of reasons, but they mostly stem from two of ours teams primary design goals; less weight, and less friction.

Small wheels are physically smaller, which is less weight.
Small wheels require less torque to turn to achieve the same force on the ground, less force in the shafts/sprockets means smaller and lighter parts.
Small wheels need less reduction, which is both a direct decrease in weight, but also a decrease in friction losses as we can run less stages of gear reduction total.
Small wheels let you have a slightly longer wheelbase for all other factors the same.
Small wheels are cheaper for us to make, as it's a smaller diameter stock, and has much less wasted material.

Also, experimental data has shown that for rough top tread, smaller diameter wheels have more traction.

To summarize, teams with small wheels usually have done actual engineering and reasoning behind their wheel size choice. Many teams with larger wheels do not (although some do, and decide to use KOP or other COTS wheels of a larger size for some logical reasons (like 111)).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi