|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: BaneBots
It all depends, I would much rather use a FP than any BB because it has more gearboxes it can adapt to, and last year BB had a horrible rate at witch they got there products to you. But we zapped our rs-775's and they worked fine.
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: BaneBots
I would just use a 550.
It has the EXACT SAME mounting pattern as the FP, the power output is almost as much as the 775 (~250 vs ~265 watts), it's slightly lighter (which unfortunately means it is more power dense and will heat up faster), and the output speed is comparable to a FP (within 10%, close enough to mate them directly). Just so everyone knows: The -0673 (2011) FP has more power than any single Banebots motor (I calculated 291 watts). |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: BaneBots
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: BaneBots
i wish they gave us more FP motors. we burned like 5 this year, but now that we know how to deal with them, i think that they could be pretty sweet. i think the rs550's in a double doozy is a bout the best you can get short of a cim for complete durability and power.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: BaneBots
Quote:
Patrick Brew First Team 1086 Blue Cheese |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: BaneBots
At this time, we have no idea what motors we'll get to use next year. I doubt that we'll get known defective motors.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: BaneBots
We don't even know if we're allowed to use aluminum next year (1714 FTW)
Quote:
wow. two smilies in a row. I better take my temperature. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: BaneBots
Wait what no aluminum?!
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: BaneBots
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: BaneBots
Good thing were learning how to use carbon fiber & polyurethane this off season
![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: BaneBots
Quote:
The rs-550s will get hot if you put them in a situation where they endure ~>50% load for 10-15 second intervals with short breaks inbetween. However, we stalled the motor (by accident) giving it ~20% power for 15 minutes or so with only mild heating of the motor. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: BaneBots
Quote:
At 12 volts at stall, you are giving it 1020 watts of power. 20% of that is 204 watts power. I doubt the 550 could dissipate 204 watts for 15 minutes with only mild heating. Maybe you meant you gave it 20% voltage? 20% of 12 volts is 2.4 volts. At 2.4 volts at stall, you are giving it 41 watts of power. Even at that lower number, the 550 would get pretty warm after 15 minutes. |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: BaneBots
Any company that mass produces a known defective or dangerous KOP item and them refuses to support the repair and/or replacement of that item should be unceremoniously DUMPED as a sponsor. And if FIRST invites such sponsors back then shame on them.
It is pure coincidence that I am writing this opinion in this particular thread. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: BaneBots
one way to prevent motors burning is to put in some software protection, if you have CAN on that motor you can limit the amount of sustained current eg, if more than 60 amps is going to the lift FP for more than .25 secs with no increase in speed, then kill it. we did this on two motors i believe, our roller and our lift, while the FP was a little harder to prevent from smoking, we stalled our roller every time we picked up a tube, and never had an issue with it.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: BaneBots
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|