|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2011-1
Sean, to not make 6 logos, you only have to lose one piece. Your Feeders only have 3 logos apiece, and you only have two Feeders. 6 Logos. I swipe a miss and put it in my zone, and suddenly you can't make 6 without taking any of mine. I swipe more than that, and you have a much harder time, because now you have to take those pieces away from me--and if I'm smart, I keep those in reserve if I can.
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2011-1
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2011-1
You are absolutely correct that interfering with a robot that is contacting the tower during the end game would be a poor choice. That would be the worst way to interpret the "smart penalty" concept. No one wants any part of a red card. Now defending the robot from getting to the tower even if it means going into the opponent’s lane to do it and eat the -3 is still an option. I expect to see hard defense in the end game. If I can delay a superior mini-bot with a penalty just enough to come in 2nd while my partner comes in first that is a 7 point swing, even more if I can delay him enough to not reach the top. Can you do that without drawing a red-card? Up until <G23> and <G25> comes into play.
|
|
#19
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2011-1
Quote:
Up until the endgame, it's a viable strategy. But if you're doing that, I'll go do the same thing to one of your partners, or make a logo. I also have another couple of tricks that could get me first in the minibot race despite your defense. And trust me, they'll be used by somebody. Smoke screens aren't always smoke...sometimes they're mirrors. |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2011-1
i cant wait to see if your prediction is correct!
|
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2011-1
It's actually 18 tubes, not 12. And beyond that, hanging 18 tubes (filling up all your scoring pegs) isn't the same as making 6 logos, either.
|
|
#22
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2011-1
A little browsing through the Car Nack Forum and you will figure it out!
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2011-1
Car Knack didn't really get this one head on...
Congrats 148, 1503, 1538. |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2011-1
Also done by 195, 254, 469 in Galileo Q-56.
|
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2011-1
Also done yesterday at Marc with 67, 245, and 469 with 25 seconds to spare. Q-1
|
|
#26
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2011-1
and again this morning with 67, 2337 and a third team I am unable to recall.
|
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Car Nack Predicts 2011-1
Quote:
Very fun to be a part of both alliances. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|