|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Michigan, be honest, how is the district model?
EDIT: While writing my post, a flurry of others clearing up the costs of districts appeared. Information is repetitive
Quote:
Okay, so. I'm not from michigan, I can't answer the OP's questions. However, I'd like to shed some light on this particular subject. According to usFIRST.org, costs are as follows: Veteran Team costs (numbers change for rookies/veteran teams without the new control system): In MI: KOP + 2 district events: $5000 Additional district event: $500 State Champs: $4000 FIRST Championship Event: $5000 Everywhere else: KOP + 1 regional event: $5000 Additional regional event: $4000 FIRST Championship Event: $5000 No matter where you are, the minimum to play is $5000 (to clear up any confusion). To get to champs in an earn-to-play way (winning events/chairmans/EI/rookie all star), it costs teams in MI: $5000 (registration) + $4000 (State) + $5000 (champs)= $14,000 not in MI: $5000 (registration) + $5000 (champs)= $10,000 So, for MI teams to say its more expensive is reasonable. They have to fund-raise an extra $4000 dollars for the intermediate step that is state. YES, they have more events for the initial cost (and a third district isn't too pricey), however, they need to pay the equivalent of TWO regionals to qualify for champs. Not-in-MI teams only need to pay for one regional to qualify for champs. Teams that could only afford a regional and champs on the old system can't do that anymore (I'm assuming earn-to-play). To "be the best" in MI means that you also have to be able to afford/budget all the extra levels of competition. (I'm sure someone will say "Then just fundraise more," but I'm just pointing out the fact that MI teams have to pay more to earn-to-play at champs) Last edited by Katie_UPS : 29-06-2011 at 14:22. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|