|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Michigan, be honest, how is the district model?
I think you might want to run real numbers on this before making up such a conclusion.
I just looked and it's almost 50/50 (46% vs 54%). Statistically speaking, people can be notoriously bad guessers. (Apartment for Peggy) Quote:
Last edited by Mark McLeod : 29-06-2011 at 16:47. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Michigan, be honest, how is the district model?
Quote:
Do you have numbers on eliminations by chance? |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Michigan, be honest, how is the district model?
Pro's:
1. We pay less to play more. This has all sorts of benefits:
3. Michigan sends teams to championship that have done well repeatedly. Not just 1 time. Con's: 1. Generally speaking, the field of teams we see in Michigan is limited to Michigan. I miss going up against Wildstangs, Technokats, Beatty, and many others nearby. 2. The events are somewhat less glamorous. 3. The district events are very much 'jammed' time wise. A day is cut out of a district to save money, which means we're usually up scouting until 1 AM on Friday night. There's no reall time to go swimming, go out and get a nice meal, etc if you're planning on picking the next day. Likewise, we start earlier. It's exhausting compared to a regional. We're HAPPY to go to state championships and world championships because, frankly, it's WAY more laid back with a much longer turn-around time between matches. All in all, the district model is superior in my mind. However, there are things I miss about the regionals events - the glamor and glitz, the laid-back atmosphere and time to have fun, etc. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|