|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Michigan, be honest, how is the district model?
I hear alot of talk of people from mi complaining about the lack of out of area at their regional, but I would be curious to hear from the people who attend the New Jersey Regional and New York City Regional about how much diversity they see at their regional now. When our team went to peachtree regional we saw mostly the same teams every year, so much so you thought of them as neighbors.
My suspicion, these regional are already in high enough demand locally that the teams don't see many outside teams there now, but I don't know(the only regionals I go to are in places where iced tea only comes sweet). If this is the case, limiting competition to the districts wouldn't bring earth shattering change to your competitors. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Michigan, be honest, how is the district model?
Quote:
About a third at both NJ and NYC were teams that had other "home" Regionals. You can check the preceding posts in that thread to follow the discussion. It doesn't necessarily mean that the same teams aren't always showing up. The last column gives an idea of the turnover rate (or team freshness?) experienced by each Regional year-to-year, that includes rookies. That's probably your best measure of the amount of new & different teams mixing each Regional up. Those numbers aren't final because a few teams were still being moved around between events, but that's the bulk of them. Also the criteria of what an away team is, is talked about inside the spreadsheet attached to that post. Last edited by Mark McLeod : 30-06-2011 at 10:55. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Michigan, be honest, how is the district model?
That is a lot of diversity that would be lost, much more then I would have thought. Thank you for taking the time to run those numbers
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|