|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
IMU320
I saw this and I thought it could be really useful in auto:
http://www.euroinvestor.co.uk/news/s...px?id=10263804 PS Does anyone know the exact cost for one of these? - Alex |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IMU320
Never used that particular one, but I have used some of Microstrain's units. (If I remember correctly, they were worth a couple thousand dollars about 5 years ago.)
They're similar internally to the sensor boards we use in FRC, with the exception that they have an on-board processor providing significant built-in filtering and communications (via RS-232, and USB on the newer ones). You're paying for the filtering and calibration when you get one of these. In an application like a UAV, the extra cost is justified, because your AHRS sensor makes your autopilot work—you can't afford to have spurious readings. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IMU320
Do you have to integrate all the values into angle and position values yourself??
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IMU320
Quote:
Check out SparkFun, they have some imu's available at various price points. http://code.google.com/p/ardu-imu/wiki/Theory might be worth reading, it is a pretty good solution at a relatively low price. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IMU320
It can work but you will see significant drift, in order to correct for drift you are going to need speed measurements. The link I posted is for drones so the GPS can provide X,Y and Z location (and therefore speed) measurements. You could get simmilar results with encoders on free rolling wheels on the robot in both the x and y direction (to do it right you would also need a magnetometer to establish direction but for the length of autonomous period you could get accurate enough results without it).
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|