|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1675's REAL IRI Upgrade
Quote:
the mecanum was meant to be an offensive machine. the tank was meant to be a bump hopping defensive machine. if you use your interpretation, then all it really proves is if your manipulator design is crap, then you will be stuck in defense. may I ask how mnay defensive bots do you see on einstien? winning regionals? note that the tank bot lost in the semifinals. why: 1. 1018 was in the far back zone, we were middle, and 1501 was by the goal. this was so 1018 could use their 3 ball auto. 2. then 1018 and ourselves would switch places by crossing the bump. we would play defense and 1018 would feed balls to 1501 and score mid zone goals directly. 3. the failure was in the switch... the alliancein the semi picked up that if they blocked the bump, 1018 would be stuck as they were too tall for the tunnel. we were tied up getting them off the bump to let 1018 cross, so their goals were undefended, hence why we lost. the fact that we were only good in one zone (defensive) was the kiss of death... also, the reason why both designs in my last post failed was they same for both. we spent so much time screwing around with perfecting designs, trying to do everything, and over-complicating things that there was no time to troubleshoot and find practical bugs. both times the drivers only got 1 day of practice before competition. so if you plan to have a manipulator that doesn't work, yeah, go tank since being able to score won't be on your agenda. If you give your design a serious effort and get something for the drivers to play with with plenty of time to spare, then mecanum may be helpful. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|