|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Don't do this. It's a bad idea.
I can't figure out why you have four Bevel gears (forming a box, differential?) connected to the left wheel... couldn't you achieve the same by extending the shaft from the right wheel directly to drive the left wheel?
THANKS! Last edited by Michael Blake : 14-08-2011 at 14:05. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Don't do this. It's a bad idea.
Actually the box results in the two turning in opposite directions.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Don't do this. It's a bad idea.
The differential is used in the drive axle of cars, read about it
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differe...ical_device%29 |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Don't do this. It's a bad idea.
Quote:
This has me scratching-my-head... ;-) |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Don't do this. It's a bad idea.
Actually, Michael, lemiant didn't have a chance to read squirrel's link yet. I would suggest reading that link, then figuring out the drive system.
Short version: If both can go the same way at the same speed, both go the same way at the same speed. But if one of them can't keep that speed up, then it doesn't have to due to the way the differential is set up. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Don't do this. It's a bad idea.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBm-S...eature=related
Here's an animation of how a differential operates for those confused. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Don't do this. It's a bad idea.
Here's a much better explanation.....but then, I do like old stuff
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F40ZBDAG8-o |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Don't do this. It's a bad idea.
Quote:
Last edited by Michael Blake : 14-08-2011 at 14:48. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Don't do this. It's a bad idea.
Quote:
THANKS! |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Don't do this. It's a bad idea.
Why not choose pneumatic tires over the suspension? I don think you would get much "play" before the bevel gear bottoms out.
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Don't do this. It's a bad idea.
Quote:
*(unless we start talking limited slip differentials and lockers etc) |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Don't do this. It's a bad idea.
Quote:
Hint: Think of this setup as 2 gearboxes. The inner box is the 4 in the middle of the "axle"; the outer is the bevel at the top and the large gear it meshes with. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Don't do this. It's a bad idea.
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Don't do this. It's a bad idea.
Quote:
![]() |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Don't do this. It's a bad idea.
Wouldn't this work better with constant velocity joints (rather than universal joints)?
And are you using the universal joint as two of the members in a four-bar linkage that holds up the wheel? If so, isn't it just going to deflect to the maximum? (Or am I missing a spring somewhere?) This would be a fun stock design to keep around...just to tempt people when FIRST decides to give us some real obstacles. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|