|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Brake vs. Coast in the Drive
Quote:
link: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/at...2&d=1295820836 Last edited by Ether : 10-11-2011 at 17:56. Reason: added links |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Brake vs. Coast in the Drive
I'd really love to see a graph of the effect of this hybrid use-case, with feet per second on the X axis and power consumption on the Y axis. Repeat the test for all coast, all brake, and half and half.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Brake vs. Coast in the Drive
We ran exactly the hybrid combination you described in our 2-motors-per-transmission drive train this year, and it worked well all year with no problems. We like the moderate braking it provides without being too severe.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Brake vs. Coast in the Drive
We did this in 2011 with black jags on CAN bus with no ill effects, our motors were 2 cims per side in tough-boxes(2 motors per gearbox) chained at 14.4 fps.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Brake vs. Coast in the Drive
Quote:
What were the advantages/disadvantages of it? Did it do exactly what you want, or were there some things you wished it could do, but didn't? If so, what? Did it put any strain on the motors? By that, I mean did your motors get broken/overheated really quickly? Thanks! |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Brake vs. Coast in the Drive
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Brake vs. Coast in the Drive
Thanks!
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|